Clinical Education Data Management: Current Landscape in Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Erin M Green, Tawna Wilkinson, Janice Howman, Jamie Bayliss, Lauren Perry
{"title":"Clinical Education Data Management: Current Landscape in Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education.","authors":"Erin M Green, Tawna Wilkinson, Janice Howman, Jamie Bayliss, Lauren Perry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data management (DM) systems represent an opportunity for innovation in education and data-driven decision-making (DDDM) in allied health education. Understanding clinical education (CE) DM systems in entry-level physical therapy (PT) education programs could provide valuable insight into structure and operation and may represent opportunities to address CE challenges. The purpose of this study is to describe how PT programs are using CE DM systems to inform recommendations for CE DM and support knowledge sharing and DDDM.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>CE faculty and administrators were recruited from entry-level PT education programs to participate in a cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors designed a novel survey which included demographics and use of CE DM systems. Descriptive statistics and content analysis of narrative data were used to examine responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was distributed to 220 academic PT programs in June 2021 with 111 respondents (50% response rate). Respondents use multiple systems to complete CE tasks (e.g., placement process, on-boarding, agreement tracking, as a CE site database). Forty-three percent (n=47) use one system, 76% (n=35) of those use the same Software as a Service vendor. Eighty-six percent (n=96) are satisfied with their current CE DM system. Respondents enter data related to CE site information, CE environment, length of the CE experience, and accreditation-required clinical instructor information. Ninety-four percent (n=93) and 70% (n=70) extract data to make decisions about the placement process and curriculum, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While variability across CE DM systems presents a challenge, survey respondents indicated common practices related to functionality, data entry, and extraction. Clinical education DM systems house critical data to address challenges in CE. Strategies to improve accessibility and use of this data to support DDDM should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 2","pages":"e77-e91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data management (DM) systems represent an opportunity for innovation in education and data-driven decision-making (DDDM) in allied health education. Understanding clinical education (CE) DM systems in entry-level physical therapy (PT) education programs could provide valuable insight into structure and operation and may represent opportunities to address CE challenges. The purpose of this study is to describe how PT programs are using CE DM systems to inform recommendations for CE DM and support knowledge sharing and DDDM.

Subjects: CE faculty and administrators were recruited from entry-level PT education programs to participate in a cross-sectional survey.

Methods: The authors designed a novel survey which included demographics and use of CE DM systems. Descriptive statistics and content analysis of narrative data were used to examine responses.

Results: The survey was distributed to 220 academic PT programs in June 2021 with 111 respondents (50% response rate). Respondents use multiple systems to complete CE tasks (e.g., placement process, on-boarding, agreement tracking, as a CE site database). Forty-three percent (n=47) use one system, 76% (n=35) of those use the same Software as a Service vendor. Eighty-six percent (n=96) are satisfied with their current CE DM system. Respondents enter data related to CE site information, CE environment, length of the CE experience, and accreditation-required clinical instructor information. Ninety-four percent (n=93) and 70% (n=70) extract data to make decisions about the placement process and curriculum, respectively.

Conclusion: While variability across CE DM systems presents a challenge, survey respondents indicated common practices related to functionality, data entry, and extraction. Clinical education DM systems house critical data to address challenges in CE. Strategies to improve accessibility and use of this data to support DDDM should be explored.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床教育数据管理:初级理疗师教育的现状。
背景:数据管理系统(DM)是联合健康教育中教育创新和数据驱动决策(DDDM)的机遇。了解入门级物理治疗(PT)教育项目中的临床教育(CE)DM 系统可为结构和运作提供有价值的见解,并可为应对 CE 挑战提供机会。本研究的目的是描述PT项目如何使用CE DM系统,为CE DM提供建议,支持知识共享和DDDM:方法:作者设计了一个新颖的调查问卷,其中包含了对CE DM的建议,以及对知识共享和DDDM的支持:作者设计了一项新颖的调查,其中包括人口统计数据和CE DM系统的使用情况。采用描述性统计和叙述性数据的内容分析来研究答复:该调查于 2021 年 6 月分发给 220 个学术性 PT 项目,共有 111 人回复(回复率为 50%)。受访者使用多个系统来完成 CE 任务(例如,安置流程、入职、协议跟踪、作为 CE 站点数据库)。43%(n=47)的受访者使用一个系统,其中 76%(n=35)的受访者使用同一个软件即服务供应商。86%(n=96)的受访者对当前的 CE DM 系统表示满意。受访者输入的数据涉及 CE 站点信息、CE 环境、CE 体验时间以及认证要求的临床指导教师信息。94%的受访者(n=93)和70%的受访者(n=70)分别通过提取数据来对实习过程和课程进行决策:虽然 CE DM 系统之间的差异带来了挑战,但调查对象指出了功能、数据录入和提取方面的共同做法。临床教育 DM 系统拥有应对 CE 挑战的关键数据。应探索改进数据访问和使用的策略,以支持 DDDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1