Emergency Department Visits for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Associations with Geriatric Age, Sex, and Fall Injury.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Carrie A Barrett, Cameron Hays, Kieran Fogarty
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Associations with Geriatric Age, Sex, and Fall Injury.","authors":"Carrie A Barrett, Cameron Hays, Kieran Fogarty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The highest rates mTBI occurrence are seen among geriatric populations (ages ≥65), and these patients often have persistent and untreated symptoms. This study's purpose was to explore mild traumatic brain injury initial onset (mTBI-IN) and mild traumatic brain injury subsequent (mTBI-S) emergency department (ED) visit population percentages and associations with geriatric (population ages ≥65), sex, and fall mechanism of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The design was a population-based cross-sectional study using data from the 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Study sample size was 261,349. An independent t-test was used to investigate mean age differences between mTBI-IN and mTBI-S. Pearson's chi-squared correlational analyses were used to investigate associations of age, sex, and fall injury with mTBI-IN and mTBI-S.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of those in 2018 with ED visits suggested that age was older for those patients with mTBI-S (age mean, 50.4 yrs) than those with mTBI-IN (age mean, 41.4 yrs) (95% CI 9.77, 8.30; p=0.025). The number of visits for those aged ≥65 was significantly associated with mTBI-S (p<0.001). More males than females reported mTBI-S ED visits in all ages (p=0.022). Falls injury alone was not found to be significantly associated with visits (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Those returning to the ED for continued care after mTBI were associated with those aged ≥65. Monitoring after mTBI ED visits may need to target geriatric populations for medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 2","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The highest rates mTBI occurrence are seen among geriatric populations (ages ≥65), and these patients often have persistent and untreated symptoms. This study's purpose was to explore mild traumatic brain injury initial onset (mTBI-IN) and mild traumatic brain injury subsequent (mTBI-S) emergency department (ED) visit population percentages and associations with geriatric (population ages ≥65), sex, and fall mechanism of injury.

Methods: The design was a population-based cross-sectional study using data from the 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Study sample size was 261,349. An independent t-test was used to investigate mean age differences between mTBI-IN and mTBI-S. Pearson's chi-squared correlational analyses were used to investigate associations of age, sex, and fall injury with mTBI-IN and mTBI-S.

Results: The mean age of those in 2018 with ED visits suggested that age was older for those patients with mTBI-S (age mean, 50.4 yrs) than those with mTBI-IN (age mean, 41.4 yrs) (95% CI 9.77, 8.30; p=0.025). The number of visits for those aged ≥65 was significantly associated with mTBI-S (p<0.001). More males than females reported mTBI-S ED visits in all ages (p=0.022). Falls injury alone was not found to be significantly associated with visits (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Those returning to the ED for continued care after mTBI were associated with those aged ≥65. Monitoring after mTBI ED visits may need to target geriatric populations for medical management.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度脑外伤的急诊就诊率:与老年人年龄、性别和摔伤的关系。
目的:老年群体(年龄≥65 岁)中的轻微创伤性脑损伤发生率最高,这些患者的症状往往持续存在且未经治疗。本研究旨在探讨轻度创伤性脑损伤初发(mTBI-IN)和轻度创伤性脑损伤继发(mTBI-S)急诊科(ED)就诊人群的比例,以及与老年人(年龄≥65 岁)、性别和跌倒致伤机制的关联:该设计是一项基于人群的横断面研究,使用的数据来自2018年全国急诊科样本(NEDS)。研究样本量为 261 349 人。采用独立t检验调查mTBI-IN和mTBI-S之间的平均年龄差异。皮尔逊卡方相关分析用于研究年龄、性别和跌倒损伤与 mTBI-IN 和 mTBI-S 的关联:2018年ED就诊者的平均年龄表明,mTBI-S患者(平均年龄50.4岁)的年龄大于mTBI-IN患者(平均年龄41.4岁)(95% CI 9.77,8.30;P=0.025)。年龄≥65岁者的就诊次数与mTBI-S显著相关(p结论:mTBI后返回急诊室继续接受治疗的患者与年龄≥65岁者有关。mTBI ED就诊后的监测可能需要针对老年群体进行医疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1