Effect of Ambient Voice Technology, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence on the Patient-Physician Relationship.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2337-4739
Lance M Owens, J Joshua Wilda, Ronald Grifka, Joan Westendorp, Jeffrey J Fletcher
{"title":"Effect of Ambient Voice Technology, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence on the Patient-Physician Relationship.","authors":"Lance M Owens, J Joshua Wilda, Ronald Grifka, Joan Westendorp, Jeffrey J Fletcher","doi":"10.1055/a-2337-4739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The method of documentation during a clinical encounter may affect the patient-physician relationship.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> Evaluate how the use of ambient voice recognition, coupled with natural language processing and artificial intelligence (DAX), affects the patient-physician relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a prospective observational study with a primary aim of evaluating any difference in patient satisfaction on the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 (PDRQ-9) scale between primary care encounters in which DAX was utilized for documentation as compared to another method. A single-arm open-label phase was also performed to query direct feedback from patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 288 patients were include in the open-label arm and 304 patients were included in the masked phase of the study comparing encounters with and without DAX use. In the open-label phase, patients strongly agreed that the provider was more focused on them, spent less time typing, and made the encounter feel more personable. In the masked phase of the study, no difference was seen in the total PDRQ-9 score between patients whose encounters used DAX (median: 45, interquartile range [IQR]: 8) and those who did not (median: 45 [IQR: 3.5]; <i>p</i> = 0.31). The adjusted odds ratio for DAX use was 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.34) for the patient reporting complete satisfaction on how well their clinician listened to them during their encounter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Patients strongly agreed with the use of ambient voice recognition, coupled with natural language processing and artificial intelligence (DAX) for documentation in primary care. However, no difference was detected in the patient-physician relationship on the PDRQ-9 scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"660-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2337-4739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The method of documentation during a clinical encounter may affect the patient-physician relationship.

Objectives:  Evaluate how the use of ambient voice recognition, coupled with natural language processing and artificial intelligence (DAX), affects the patient-physician relationship.

Methods:  This was a prospective observational study with a primary aim of evaluating any difference in patient satisfaction on the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 (PDRQ-9) scale between primary care encounters in which DAX was utilized for documentation as compared to another method. A single-arm open-label phase was also performed to query direct feedback from patients.

Results:  A total of 288 patients were include in the open-label arm and 304 patients were included in the masked phase of the study comparing encounters with and without DAX use. In the open-label phase, patients strongly agreed that the provider was more focused on them, spent less time typing, and made the encounter feel more personable. In the masked phase of the study, no difference was seen in the total PDRQ-9 score between patients whose encounters used DAX (median: 45, interquartile range [IQR]: 8) and those who did not (median: 45 [IQR: 3.5]; p = 0.31). The adjusted odds ratio for DAX use was 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.34) for the patient reporting complete satisfaction on how well their clinician listened to them during their encounter.

Conclusion:  Patients strongly agreed with the use of ambient voice recognition, coupled with natural language processing and artificial intelligence (DAX) for documentation in primary care. However, no difference was detected in the patient-physician relationship on the PDRQ-9 scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境语音技术、自然语言处理和人工智能对医患关系的影响。
背景:临床诊疗过程中的记录方法可能会影响医患关系:临床诊疗过程中的记录方法可能会影响医患关系:评估使用环境语音识别、自然语言处理和人工智能(DAX™)对医患关系的影响:方法:在社区教学医疗系统内进行前瞻性观察研究。主要目的是评估使用 DAX™ 进行记录的初级保健会诊与未使用 DAX™ 进行记录的初级保健会诊在 PDQR-9 量表上的差异。此外,还进行了信号臂开放标签阶段,以询问患者的直接反馈:共有 288 名患者参加了开放标签阶段的研究,304 名患者参加了蒙面阶段的研究,对使用和未使用 DAX™ 的情况进行了比较。在开放标签阶段,患者强烈认为医疗服务提供者更专注于他们的病情,花费的打字时间更少,就诊感觉更亲切。在蒙面研究阶段,使用 DAX™ 的患者(中位数 45 [IQR 8])与未使用 DAX™ 的患者(中位数 45 [IQR 3.5];P=0.31)的 PDQR-9 总分排序没有差异。如果患者对临床医生在诊疗过程中倾听其意见的程度表示完全满意,则使用 DAX™ 的调整赔率为 0.8 (95% CI 0.48-1.34):患者非常赞同将环境语音识别与自然语言处理和人工智能(DAX™)相结合,用于初级医疗记录。然而,在 PDQR-9 量表中并未发现医患关系的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Extracting International Classification of Diseases Codes from Clinical Documentation using Large Language Models. Special_Issue_Teaching_and_Training_Future_Health_Informaticians: Managing the transition from tradition to innovation of the Heidelberg/Heilbronn Medical Informatics Master's Program. Effects of Aligning Residency Note Templates with CMS Evaluation and Management Documentation Requirements. Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening. Optimizing Resident Charge Capture with Disappearing Help Text in Note Templates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1