Initial Development and Validation of Physical Therapy-Patient Education Questionnaire (PT-PEQ).

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Ninwisan Hengsomboon, Wanlop Kunanusornchai, Prasert Sakulsriprasert, Pichaya Hengsomboon, Sirikarn Somprasong, Monticha Sakuna, Pornsiri Pipatkasira, Warinda Intiravoranont, Paiboon Sathianpantarit, Mark P Jensen
{"title":"Initial Development and Validation of Physical Therapy-Patient Education Questionnaire (PT-PEQ).","authors":"Ninwisan Hengsomboon, Wanlop Kunanusornchai, Prasert Sakulsriprasert, Pichaya Hengsomboon, Sirikarn Somprasong, Monticha Sakuna, Pornsiri Pipatkasira, Warinda Intiravoranont, Paiboon Sathianpantarit, Mark P Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient education can increase patient engagement and positive outcomes with physical therapy treatment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a physical therapy patient education questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Candidate items were developed and evaluated by an expert panel for content validity. The resulting items were administered to 350 patients in physical therapy treatment, and the reliability and validity of the scale's subscales were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the questionnaire consists of 36 items that assess six education domains for patients receiving physical therapy: 1) assessment and information provision (10 items), 2) hygiene and safety (9 items), 3) patient empowerment (8 items), 4) emergency and infection control (3 items), 5) adverse event prevention (4 items), and 6) identity confirmation (2 items). The internal consistency of the subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.92, and support for the six-domain structure of the items was supported via factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The questionnaire was successfully developed and evidenced good psychometric properties for the assessment of the perceived importance of six physical therapy education domains. Research is needed to evaluate potential gaps between patients' perceived education needs and therapist education activities during physical therapy treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 2","pages":"142-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient education can increase patient engagement and positive outcomes with physical therapy treatment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a physical therapy patient education questionnaire.

Methods: Candidate items were developed and evaluated by an expert panel for content validity. The resulting items were administered to 350 patients in physical therapy treatment, and the reliability and validity of the scale's subscales were evaluated.

Results: The final version of the questionnaire consists of 36 items that assess six education domains for patients receiving physical therapy: 1) assessment and information provision (10 items), 2) hygiene and safety (9 items), 3) patient empowerment (8 items), 4) emergency and infection control (3 items), 5) adverse event prevention (4 items), and 6) identity confirmation (2 items). The internal consistency of the subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.92, and support for the six-domain structure of the items was supported via factor analysis.

Conclusions: The questionnaire was successfully developed and evidenced good psychometric properties for the assessment of the perceived importance of six physical therapy education domains. Research is needed to evaluate potential gaps between patients' perceived education needs and therapist education activities during physical therapy treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗-患者教育问卷(PT-PEQ)的初步开发与验证。
背景:患者教育可提高患者的参与度和物理治疗的积极效果。本研究旨在开发和评估物理治疗患者教育问卷的心理测量特性:方法:开发了候选项目,并由专家小组对其内容有效性进行评估。对 350 名接受物理治疗的患者进行了问卷调查,并对量表各分量表的信度和效度进行了评估:问卷的最终版本由 36 个项目组成,对接受物理治疗的患者的六个教育领域进行评估:1)评估和信息提供(10 个项目);2)卫生和安全(9 个项目);3)患者授权(8 个项目);4)紧急情况和感染控制(3 个项目);5)不良事件预防(4 个项目);6)身份确认(2 个项目)。各分量表的内部一致性为 0.69 至 0.92,通过因子分析,支持项目的六域结构:该问卷已成功开发,并在评估物理治疗教育六个领域的重要性认知方面具有良好的心理测量特性。在物理治疗过程中,患者感知到的教育需求与治疗师教育活动之间可能存在的差距需要进行研究评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1