Mute by Visitation of God, Competency to Stand Trial and Fitness to Plead.

Alec Buchanan
{"title":"Mute by Visitation of God, Competency to Stand Trial and Fitness to Plead.","authors":"Alec Buchanan","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240005-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laws on competency to stand trial and fitness to plead are said to derive from \"mute by visitation of God,\" a medieval English legal term referring to the inability to speak through no fault of one's own. The paper describes the relevant historical background, illustrative cases, and legal commentaries. Muteness by visitation of God arose to address a particular set of difficulties caused by the need to have medieval defendants agree to be tried. Competency to stand trial and fitness to plead, on the other hand, arose to address more general and enduring concerns, that putting people on trial when they were unable to understand or participate compromised the dignity and fairness of criminal proceedings. The origins of competency to stand trial and fitness to plead do not lie in medieval English attempts to persuade silent defendants to speak. They warrant their own historical exegesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"52 2","pages":"207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240005-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laws on competency to stand trial and fitness to plead are said to derive from "mute by visitation of God," a medieval English legal term referring to the inability to speak through no fault of one's own. The paper describes the relevant historical background, illustrative cases, and legal commentaries. Muteness by visitation of God arose to address a particular set of difficulties caused by the need to have medieval defendants agree to be tried. Competency to stand trial and fitness to plead, on the other hand, arose to address more general and enduring concerns, that putting people on trial when they were unable to understand or participate compromised the dignity and fairness of criminal proceedings. The origins of competency to stand trial and fitness to plead do not lie in medieval English attempts to persuade silent defendants to speak. They warrant their own historical exegesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因上帝探视而哑巴、有能力出庭受审和适于认罪。
关于受审能力和适格答辩的法律据说源于 "上帝探视哑巴",这是中世纪英国的一个法律术语,指非因自身过错而不能说话。本文介绍了相关的历史背景、说明性案例和法律评论。神明探视无行为能力的出现是为了解决中世纪被告需要同意接受审判所造成的一系列特殊困难。另一方面,受审资格和适格答辩则是为了解决更为普遍和持久的问题,即在人们无法理解或参与的情况下让他们接受审判,会损害刑事诉讼的尊严和公正性。受审资格和抗辩资格的起源并不在于中世纪英国人试图说服沉默的被告人说话。它们应该有自己的历史注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions. Hunger Strikes After Restricted Housing Reform. Practice Resource for Reproductive Psychiatry/Women's Mental Health in Forensic Psychiatry Practice. Characterizing Referrals to Professional Health Monitoring Programs for Unprofessional Sexual Behavior. Dosing and Misuse of Buprenorphine in the New Jersey Department of Corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1