Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio biomarkers in predicting bacteremia and sepsis in immunosuppressive patients with cancer: literature review.

Porto biomedical journal Pub Date : 2024-06-04 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000254
Jose Manuel Martinez, Ana Espírito Santo, Diana Ramada, Filipa Fontes, Rui Medeiros
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio biomarkers in predicting bacteremia and sepsis in immunosuppressive patients with cancer: literature review.","authors":"Jose Manuel Martinez, Ana Espírito Santo, Diana Ramada, Filipa Fontes, Rui Medeiros","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This literature review explores the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (NLPR) biomarkers, as potential indicators for predicting bacteremia and sepsis in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tracing the evolution of interest in this area since 2001, the aim of this review was to report a comprehensive overview of current knowledge and gaps, particularly in patients undergoing immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Summary of findings: </strong>The literature research indicates the potential of NLR, PLR, and other biomarkers in diagnosing and predicting sepsis, with some studies emphasizing their value in mortality prediction. A specific focus on bacteremia shows the effectiveness of NLR and PLR as early indicators and prognostic tools, though mostly in noncancer patient populations. While NLR and PLR are promising in general cancer patient populations, the review addresses the challenges in applying these biomarkers to patients with neutropenic and lymphopenic cancer. The NLPR could be considered a significant biomarker for inflammation and mortality risk in various medical conditions, yet its diagnostic accuracy in patients with immunosuppressed cancer is not extensively validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review offers a snapshot of the current research on biomarkers in patients with immunocompromised cancer in the sepsis and bacteremia area. More focused research on their application is necessary. This gap underscores an opportunity for future studies to enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in this high-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"9 3","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This literature review explores the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (NLPR) biomarkers, as potential indicators for predicting bacteremia and sepsis in patients with cancer.

Objective: Tracing the evolution of interest in this area since 2001, the aim of this review was to report a comprehensive overview of current knowledge and gaps, particularly in patients undergoing immunosuppression.

Summary of findings: The literature research indicates the potential of NLR, PLR, and other biomarkers in diagnosing and predicting sepsis, with some studies emphasizing their value in mortality prediction. A specific focus on bacteremia shows the effectiveness of NLR and PLR as early indicators and prognostic tools, though mostly in noncancer patient populations. While NLR and PLR are promising in general cancer patient populations, the review addresses the challenges in applying these biomarkers to patients with neutropenic and lymphopenic cancer. The NLPR could be considered a significant biomarker for inflammation and mortality risk in various medical conditions, yet its diagnostic accuracy in patients with immunosuppressed cancer is not extensively validated.

Conclusion: This review offers a snapshot of the current research on biomarkers in patients with immunocompromised cancer in the sepsis and bacteremia area. More focused research on their application is necessary. This gap underscores an opportunity for future studies to enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in this high-risk group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值以及中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞-血小板比值生物标志物在预测免疫抑制性癌症患者菌血症和败血症方面的诊断准确性:文献综述。
背景:这篇文献综述探讨了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞-血小板比值(NLPR)生物标志物作为预测癌症患者菌血症和败血症的潜在指标的作用:本综述追溯了自 2001 年以来人们对这一领域兴趣的演变,旨在全面概述当前的知识和差距,特别是在接受免疫抑制的患者中:文献研究表明,NLR、PLR 和其他生物标志物在诊断和预测败血症方面具有潜力,一些研究强调了它们在预测死亡率方面的价值。对菌血症的特别关注显示了 NLR 和 PLR 作为早期指标和预后工具的有效性,尽管主要是在非癌症患者群体中。虽然 NLR 和 PLR 在普通癌症患者群体中很有前景,但本综述探讨了将这些生物标记物应用于中性粒细胞增多症和淋巴细胞增多症癌症患者所面临的挑战。NLPR可被视为各种疾病中炎症和死亡风险的重要生物标志物,但其在免疫抑制癌症患者中的诊断准确性尚未得到广泛验证:本综述概述了目前在脓毒症和菌血症领域对免疫受损癌症患者的生物标志物的研究。有必要对其应用进行更有针对性的研究。这一空白为今后的研究提供了机会,以提高这一高风险群体的诊断和预后能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the armchair to contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: the remarkable ongoing journey of exercise training in ischemic heart disease. Serum total bilirubin is a risk factor of metabolic syndrome and its components in obese Egyptians. Emerging perspectives in the management of IgA nephropathy: a comprehensive review. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility profile of urine cultures in patients with spinal cord injury-retrospective study. Rare extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a diagnostic challenge and therapeutic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1