Traditional slavery institutions and democratization: Insights into intercaste human capital disparities in Sumba Island’s rural areas, Indonesia

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Regional Science Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100011
Umbu Reku Raya , Budy P. Resosudarmo
{"title":"Traditional slavery institutions and democratization: Insights into intercaste human capital disparities in Sumba Island’s rural areas, Indonesia","authors":"Umbu Reku Raya ,&nbsp;Budy P. Resosudarmo","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by examining the impact of prevailing traditional slavery institutions and democratization processes on human capital development. In our pursuit, we conducted a residential survey in Sumba Island, Indonesia. Notably, despite democratization efforts since the 1950s, the traditional slavery institution, deeply entrenched in the ancient Austronesian ranking system, remains prevalent. This system classifies individuals into three hereditary tiers: nobles, commoners, and slaves. Based on the premise that caste designation is random and exogenous, we utilized an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation approach, incorporating natal clan and cohort fixed effects. Our findings underscore the distinct advantage in human capital that individuals of the noble rank hold over their counterparts in the lower ranks, i.e. commoners and slaves. However, we also highlight the promise of ongoing democratization in bridging the human capital gaps between nobles and slaves, while simultaneously enhancing the potential for commoners to improve their human capital outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398/pdfft?md5=ac816e399eadec864624d22fdc66af56&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by examining the impact of prevailing traditional slavery institutions and democratization processes on human capital development. In our pursuit, we conducted a residential survey in Sumba Island, Indonesia. Notably, despite democratization efforts since the 1950s, the traditional slavery institution, deeply entrenched in the ancient Austronesian ranking system, remains prevalent. This system classifies individuals into three hereditary tiers: nobles, commoners, and slaves. Based on the premise that caste designation is random and exogenous, we utilized an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation approach, incorporating natal clan and cohort fixed effects. Our findings underscore the distinct advantage in human capital that individuals of the noble rank hold over their counterparts in the lower ranks, i.e. commoners and slaves. However, we also highlight the promise of ongoing democratization in bridging the human capital gaps between nobles and slaves, while simultaneously enhancing the potential for commoners to improve their human capital outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统奴隶制和民主化:洞察印度尼西亚松巴岛农村地区种姓间人力资本差异
本研究旨在通过考察盛行的传统奴隶制度和民主化进程对人力资本发展的影响,弥补现有文献的不足。为了实现这一目标,我们在印度尼西亚松巴岛开展了一项居民调查。值得注意的是,尽管自 20 世纪 50 年代以来一直在努力实现民主化,但根深蒂固于古代奥斯特罗尼西亚等级制度的传统奴隶制依然盛行。该制度将个人分为三个世袭等级:贵族、平民和奴隶。基于种姓划分是随机和外生的这一前提,我们采用了普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计方法,并纳入了出生地氏族和队列固定效应。我们的研究结果表明,贵族阶层的人在人力资本方面比低等阶层(即平民和奴隶)的人具有明显优势。不过,我们也强调了正在进行的民主化在缩小贵族和奴隶之间人力资本差距方面的前景,同时也增强了平民改善其人力资本成果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Are there Marshallian industrial districts in Portugal? revisiting the canello and pavone algorithm Estimating urban sprawl standards by means of the Urban Metric System Modeling and spatialization of biomass and carbon stock using unmanned Aerial Vehicle Lidar (Lidar-UAV) metrics and forest inventory in cork oak forest of Maamora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1