A Survey on Malware Detection with Graph Representation Learning

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Computing Surveys Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1145/3664649
Tristan Bilot, Nour El Madhoun, Khaldoun Al Agha, Anis Zouaoui
{"title":"A Survey on Malware Detection with Graph Representation Learning","authors":"Tristan Bilot, Nour El Madhoun, Khaldoun Al Agha, Anis Zouaoui","doi":"10.1145/3664649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Malware detection has become a major concern due to the increasing number and complexity of malware. Traditional detection methods based on signatures and heuristics are used for malware detection, but unfortunately, they suffer from poor generalization to unknown attacks and can be easily circumvented using obfuscation techniques. In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) and notably Deep Learning (DL) achieved impressive results in malware detection by learning useful representations from data and have become a solution preferred over traditional methods. Recently, the application of Graph Representation Learning (GRL) techniques on graph-structured data has demonstrated impressive capabilities in malware detection. This success benefits notably from the robust structure of graphs, which are challenging for attackers to alter, and their intrinsic explainability capabilities. In this survey, we provide an in-depth literature review to summarize and unify existing works under the common approaches and architectures. We notably demonstrate that Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) reach competitive results in learning robust embeddings from malware represented as expressive graph structures such as Function Call Graphs (FCGs) and Control Flow Graphs (CFGs). This study also discusses the robustness of GRL-based methods to adversarial attacks, contrasts their effectiveness with other ML/DL approaches, and outlines future research for practical deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3664649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malware detection has become a major concern due to the increasing number and complexity of malware. Traditional detection methods based on signatures and heuristics are used for malware detection, but unfortunately, they suffer from poor generalization to unknown attacks and can be easily circumvented using obfuscation techniques. In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) and notably Deep Learning (DL) achieved impressive results in malware detection by learning useful representations from data and have become a solution preferred over traditional methods. Recently, the application of Graph Representation Learning (GRL) techniques on graph-structured data has demonstrated impressive capabilities in malware detection. This success benefits notably from the robust structure of graphs, which are challenging for attackers to alter, and their intrinsic explainability capabilities. In this survey, we provide an in-depth literature review to summarize and unify existing works under the common approaches and architectures. We notably demonstrate that Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) reach competitive results in learning robust embeddings from malware represented as expressive graph structures such as Function Call Graphs (FCGs) and Control Flow Graphs (CFGs). This study also discusses the robustness of GRL-based methods to adversarial attacks, contrasts their effectiveness with other ML/DL approaches, and outlines future research for practical deployment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用图表示学习进行恶意软件检测的调查
由于恶意软件的数量和复杂性不断增加,恶意软件检测已成为一个主要问题。传统的恶意软件检测方法基于签名和启发式方法,但遗憾的是,这些方法对未知攻击的泛化能力较差,而且很容易被混淆技术所规避。近年来,机器学习(ML),尤其是深度学习(DL)通过从数据中学习有用的表征,在恶意软件检测方面取得了令人瞩目的成果,并已成为一种优于传统方法的解决方案。最近,图表示学习(GRL)技术在图结构数据上的应用已在恶意软件检测中展现出令人印象深刻的能力。这种成功主要得益于图的强大结构(攻击者很难改变这种结构)及其内在的可解释性。在本调查报告中,我们对文献进行了深入回顾,总结并统一了通用方法和架构下的现有工作。值得注意的是,我们证明了图神经网络(GNN)在从以函数调用图(FCG)和控制流图(CFG)等表现性图结构表示的恶意软件中学习稳健嵌入方面取得了有竞争力的结果。本研究还讨论了基于 GRL 的方法对对抗性攻击的鲁棒性,对比了它们与其他 ML/DL 方法的有效性,并概述了未来的实际部署研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
期刊最新文献
Security and Privacy on Generative Data in AIGC: A Survey Open-Ethical AI: Advancements in Open-Source Human-Centric Neural Language Models Fog Computing Technology Research: A Retrospective Overview and Bibliometric Analysis Evaluation Methodologies in Software Protection Research Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision: A Comparative Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1