Luis F. Guerrero-Vásquez, Vladimir E. Robles-Bykbaev, Pedro A. Cordero-Jara, Pablo S. Jara-Jimbo
{"title":"Design and Evaluation of a Mobile Robotic Assistant for Emotional Learning in Individuals with ASD: Expert Evaluation Stage","authors":"Luis F. Guerrero-Vásquez, Vladimir E. Robles-Bykbaev, Pedro A. Cordero-Jara, Pablo S. Jara-Jimbo","doi":"10.1007/s12369-024-01145-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article introduces the design and assessment of a robotic assistant aimed at generating therapeutic interventions for individuals with ASD. A uniform oval-shaped structure was considered for the design, featuring two arms, leg-like wheels, and a facial screen for displaying facial expressions. Six basic emotional states were generated, enriched with facial expressions, colors, sounds, and movements, aiming to emulate human nonverbal language to the greatest extent possible. The construction process was executed using additive manufacturing technology, specifically 3D printing. Once the functional prototype was developed, its appearance, therapeutic usability, generation of emotional states, and social skill development were evaluated through structured surveys on a Likert Scale. The evaluation took place in two stages: (a) expert peer evaluation, involving 5 experts in ASD, with consensus levels determined using Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (<span>\\(\\omega \\)</span>), that show a susbtantial agreement (<span>\\(\\omega =0.709\\)</span>) regarding the robot appearance and slight agreement (<span>\\(\\omega =0.183\\)</span>) in mood generation; (b) perception assessment with individuals who work daily with people with ASD, with 36 participants, and survey validation through Cronbach’s Alpha (<span>\\(\\alpha = 0.94\\)</span>), followed by results analysis using descriptive statistics, which indicates that the robot appearance is suitable for the majority of evaluators, but they differ in the robot dimensions. Outcomes highlighted the robotic assistant’s specific characteristics that warrant adjustments before piloting with ASD individuals. This study presents a replicable protocol for the preliminary evaluation of any technological support geared towards therapeutic interventions, preceding experimental processes involving the target audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":14361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Robotics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01145-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article introduces the design and assessment of a robotic assistant aimed at generating therapeutic interventions for individuals with ASD. A uniform oval-shaped structure was considered for the design, featuring two arms, leg-like wheels, and a facial screen for displaying facial expressions. Six basic emotional states were generated, enriched with facial expressions, colors, sounds, and movements, aiming to emulate human nonverbal language to the greatest extent possible. The construction process was executed using additive manufacturing technology, specifically 3D printing. Once the functional prototype was developed, its appearance, therapeutic usability, generation of emotional states, and social skill development were evaluated through structured surveys on a Likert Scale. The evaluation took place in two stages: (a) expert peer evaluation, involving 5 experts in ASD, with consensus levels determined using Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (\(\omega \)), that show a susbtantial agreement (\(\omega =0.709\)) regarding the robot appearance and slight agreement (\(\omega =0.183\)) in mood generation; (b) perception assessment with individuals who work daily with people with ASD, with 36 participants, and survey validation through Cronbach’s Alpha (\(\alpha = 0.94\)), followed by results analysis using descriptive statistics, which indicates that the robot appearance is suitable for the majority of evaluators, but they differ in the robot dimensions. Outcomes highlighted the robotic assistant’s specific characteristics that warrant adjustments before piloting with ASD individuals. This study presents a replicable protocol for the preliminary evaluation of any technological support geared towards therapeutic interventions, preceding experimental processes involving the target audience.
期刊介绍:
Social Robotics is the study of robots that are able to interact and communicate among themselves, with humans, and with the environment, within the social and cultural structure attached to its role. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics related to the latest technologies, new research results and developments in the area of social robotics on all levels, from developments in core enabling technologies to system integration, aesthetic design, applications and social implications. It provides a platform for like-minded researchers to present their findings and latest developments in social robotics, covering relevant advances in engineering, computing, arts and social sciences.
The journal publishes original, peer reviewed articles and contributions on innovative ideas and concepts, new discoveries and improvements, as well as novel applications, by leading researchers and developers regarding the latest fundamental advances in the core technologies that form the backbone of social robotics, distinguished developmental projects in the area, as well as seminal works in aesthetic design, ethics and philosophy, studies on social impact and influence, pertaining to social robotics.