A Truthmaker-based Epistemic Logic

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s10992-024-09758-3
Vita Saitta
{"title":"A Truthmaker-based Epistemic Logic","authors":"Vita Saitta","doi":"10.1007/s10992-024-09758-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this work is to investigate the problem of Logical Omniscience in epistemic logic by means of truthmaker semantics. We will present a semantic framework based on <span>\\(\\varvec{W}\\)</span>-models extended with a partial function, which selects the <i>body of knowledge</i> of the agents, namely the set of verifiers of the agent’s <i>total knowledge</i>. The semantic clause for knowledge follows the intuition that an agent knows some information <span>\\(\\varvec{\\phi }\\)</span>, when the <i>propositional content</i> that <span>\\(\\varvec{\\phi }\\)</span> is <i>contained</i> in her total knowledge. We will argue that this idea mirrors the philosophical conception of <i>immanent closure</i> by Yablo (2014), giving to our proposal a strong philosophical motivation. We will discuss the philosophical implications of the semantics and we will introduce its axiomatization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51526,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09758-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to investigate the problem of Logical Omniscience in epistemic logic by means of truthmaker semantics. We will present a semantic framework based on \(\varvec{W}\)-models extended with a partial function, which selects the body of knowledge of the agents, namely the set of verifiers of the agent’s total knowledge. The semantic clause for knowledge follows the intuition that an agent knows some information \(\varvec{\phi }\), when the propositional content that \(\varvec{\phi }\) is contained in her total knowledge. We will argue that this idea mirrors the philosophical conception of immanent closure by Yablo (2014), giving to our proposal a strong philosophical motivation. We will discuss the philosophical implications of the semantics and we will introduce its axiomatization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于真理制造者的认识论逻辑
这项工作的目的是通过真理制造者语义学来研究认识论逻辑中的 "逻辑全知"(Logical Omniscience)问题。我们将提出一个基于部分函数扩展的(\varvec{W}\)模型的语义框架,该部分函数选择代理的知识体,即代理总知识的验证者集合。知识的语义子句遵循这样的直觉:当 \(\varvec{\phi }\) 的命题内容包含在代理的总知识中时,代理就知道某些信息 \(\varvec{\phi}\)。我们将论证这一观点反映了 Yablo(2014)关于内在封闭的哲学概念,从而为我们的提议提供了强有力的哲学动机。我们将讨论语义学的哲学意义,并介绍其公理化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Philosophical Logic aims to provide a forum for work at the crossroads of philosophy and logic, old and new, with contributions ranging from conceptual to technical.  Accordingly, the Journal invites papers in all of the traditional areas of philosophical logic, including but not limited to: various versions of modal, temporal, epistemic, and deontic logic; constructive logics; relevance and other sub-classical logics; many-valued logics; logics of conditionals; quantum logic; decision theory, inductive logic, logics of belief change, and formal epistemology; defeasible and nonmonotonic logics; formal philosophy of language; vagueness; and theories of truth and validity. In addition to publishing papers on philosophical logic in this familiar sense of the term, the Journal also invites papers on extensions of logic to new areas of application, and on the philosophical issues to which these give rise. The Journal places a special emphasis on the applications of philosophical logic in other disciplines, not only in mathematics and the natural sciences but also, for example, in computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, linguistics, jurisprudence, and the social sciences, such as economics, sociology, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Patches, Patchworks, and Epsilon Terms: A Neo-Carnapian Account of Theoretical Terms in Science Fusions in Intuitionistic Mereology Infinity, Choice, and Hume’s Principle Heraclitus-Maximal Worlds Epistemic Logics for Relevant Reasoners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1