Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection in poor responders.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240031
Luciana María Devenutto, Gastón Rey Valzacchi, Marianela Ercolano, Orlando Etchegoyen
{"title":"Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection in poor responders.","authors":"Luciana María Devenutto, Gastón Rey Valzacchi, Marianela Ercolano, Orlando Etchegoyen","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if it possible to improve ovarian reserve parameters and oocyte retrieval in poor responders who undergo intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study. We included 148 poor responders who underwent PRP injection between October 2021 and December 2022 in our institution, comparing pre and post PRP ovarian function. In addition, the IVF outcomes of a subgroup of patients was studied after the intervention in contrast with the previous treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An improvement in ovarian reserve was observed in relation to previous values: FSH (13.57 vs. 11.32, p=0.11), AMH (0.39 vs. 0.48, p=0.06), antral follicle count (3.98 vs. 5.75, p<0.001); as well as a higher number of oocytes retrieved (2.63 vs. 3.65, p=0.01) and produced embryos (1.64 vs. 2.22, p=0.03); without a great impact on pregnancy rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although experimental, intraovarian PRP could restore ovarian function and be postulated as an alternative to oocyte donation in patients with low ovarian reserve who do not accept this treatment. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials to support these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"450-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if it possible to improve ovarian reserve parameters and oocyte retrieval in poor responders who undergo intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Methods: Prospective cohort study. We included 148 poor responders who underwent PRP injection between October 2021 and December 2022 in our institution, comparing pre and post PRP ovarian function. In addition, the IVF outcomes of a subgroup of patients was studied after the intervention in contrast with the previous treatment.

Results: An improvement in ovarian reserve was observed in relation to previous values: FSH (13.57 vs. 11.32, p=0.11), AMH (0.39 vs. 0.48, p=0.06), antral follicle count (3.98 vs. 5.75, p<0.001); as well as a higher number of oocytes retrieved (2.63 vs. 3.65, p=0.01) and produced embryos (1.64 vs. 2.22, p=0.03); without a great impact on pregnancy rates.

Conclusions: Although experimental, intraovarian PRP could restore ovarian function and be postulated as an alternative to oocyte donation in patients with low ovarian reserve who do not accept this treatment. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials to support these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对反应不佳者进行卵巢内血小板丰富血浆注射。
目的评估对卵巢内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)反应不佳者是否有可能改善卵巢储备参数和卵母细胞检索:前瞻性队列研究。我们纳入了 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在我院接受 PRP 注射的 148 例反应不佳者,比较了 PRP 前和 PRP 后的卵巢功能。此外,我们还研究了干预后与之前治疗相比,一部分患者的试管婴儿结果:结果:与之前的数值相比,卵巢储备功能有所改善:结果:与之前的数值相比,卵巢储备功能有所改善:FSH(13.57 vs. 11.32,p=0.11)、AMH(0.39 vs. 0.48,p=0.06)、前卵泡计数(3.98 vs. 5.75,pConclusions):尽管是实验性的,但卵巢内 PRP 可恢复卵巢功能,对于卵巢储备功能低下且不接受卵母细胞捐献治疗的患者,可将其作为卵母细胞捐献的替代方案。目前还缺乏随机对照试验来支持这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Effects of dietary quercetin on retrieved mouse oocytes and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Increased antinuclear (anti-Sm) antibodies in infertile patients with peritoneal endometriosis. Microfluidic in compared with Zeta potential, MACS and swim up methods, resulted in improved chromatin integrity and high quality sperms. Quality of information on fertility clinic websites accredited by the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction. Deleterious Effects of Caffeine Consumption on Reproductive Functions of Female Wistar Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1