Evaluation of deep-learning TSE images in clinical musculoskeletal imaging

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13714
Rajat Vashistha, Mustafa M Almuqbel, Nick J Palmer, Ross J Keenan, Kevin Gilbert, Scott Wells, Andrew Lynch, Andrew Li, Stephen Kingston-Smith, Tracy R Melzer, Gregor Koerzdoerfer, Kieran O'Brien
{"title":"Evaluation of deep-learning TSE images in clinical musculoskeletal imaging","authors":"Rajat Vashistha,&nbsp;Mustafa M Almuqbel,&nbsp;Nick J Palmer,&nbsp;Ross J Keenan,&nbsp;Kevin Gilbert,&nbsp;Scott Wells,&nbsp;Andrew Lynch,&nbsp;Andrew Li,&nbsp;Stephen Kingston-Smith,&nbsp;Tracy R Melzer,&nbsp;Gregor Koerzdoerfer,&nbsp;Kieran O'Brien","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we compared the fat-saturated (FS) and non-FS turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging knee sequences reconstructed conventionally (conventional-TSE) against a deep learning-based reconstruction of accelerated TSE (DL-TSE) scans. A total of 232 conventional-TSE and DL-TSE image pairs were acquired for comparison. For each consenting patient, one of the clinically acquired conventional-TSE proton density-weighted sequences in the sagittal or coronal planes (FS and non-FS), or in the axial plane (non-FS), was repeated using a research DL-TSE sequence. The DL-TSE reconstruction resulted in an image resolution that increased by at least 45% and scan times that were up to 52% faster compared to the conventional TSE. All images were acquired on a MAGNETOM Vida 3T scanner (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany). The reporting radiologists, blinded to the acquisition time, were requested to qualitatively compare the DL-TSE against the conventional-TSE reconstructions. Despite having a faster acquisition time, the DL-TSE was rated to depict smaller structures better for 139/232 (60%) cases, equivalent for 72/232 (31%) cases and worse for 21/232 (9%) cases compared to the conventional-TSE. Overall, the radiologists preferred the DL-TSE reconstruction in 124/232 (53%) cases and stated no preference, implying equivalence, for 65/232 (28%) cases. DL-TSE reconstructions enabled faster acquisition times while enhancing spatial resolution and preserving the image contrast. From these results, the DL-TSE provided added or comparable clinical value and utility in less time. DL-TSE offers the opportunity to further reduce the overall examination time and improve patient comfort with no loss in diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 5","pages":"556-563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13714","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compared the fat-saturated (FS) and non-FS turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging knee sequences reconstructed conventionally (conventional-TSE) against a deep learning-based reconstruction of accelerated TSE (DL-TSE) scans. A total of 232 conventional-TSE and DL-TSE image pairs were acquired for comparison. For each consenting patient, one of the clinically acquired conventional-TSE proton density-weighted sequences in the sagittal or coronal planes (FS and non-FS), or in the axial plane (non-FS), was repeated using a research DL-TSE sequence. The DL-TSE reconstruction resulted in an image resolution that increased by at least 45% and scan times that were up to 52% faster compared to the conventional TSE. All images were acquired on a MAGNETOM Vida 3T scanner (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany). The reporting radiologists, blinded to the acquisition time, were requested to qualitatively compare the DL-TSE against the conventional-TSE reconstructions. Despite having a faster acquisition time, the DL-TSE was rated to depict smaller structures better for 139/232 (60%) cases, equivalent for 72/232 (31%) cases and worse for 21/232 (9%) cases compared to the conventional-TSE. Overall, the radiologists preferred the DL-TSE reconstruction in 124/232 (53%) cases and stated no preference, implying equivalence, for 65/232 (28%) cases. DL-TSE reconstructions enabled faster acquisition times while enhancing spatial resolution and preserving the image contrast. From these results, the DL-TSE provided added or comparable clinical value and utility in less time. DL-TSE offers the opportunity to further reduce the overall examination time and improve patient comfort with no loss in diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估深度学习 TSE 图像在临床肌肉骨骼成像中的应用。
在这项研究中,我们比较了脂肪饱和(FS)和非脂肪饱和涡轮自旋回波(TSE)磁共振成像膝关节序列的传统重建(传统-TSE)与基于深度学习的加速 TSE 重建(DL-TSE)扫描。共采集了 232 对传统 TSE 和 DL-TSE 图像进行对比。对于每位征得同意的患者,使用研究的 DL-TSE 序列重复矢状面或冠状面(FS 和非 FS)或轴向面(非 FS)上临床获取的常规-TSE 质子密度加权序列之一。与传统的 TSE 相比,DL-TSE 重建后的图像分辨率至少提高了 45%,扫描时间最多缩短了 52%。所有图像均在 MAGNETOM Vida 3T 扫描仪(德国埃尔兰根,西门子健康股份公司)上采集。报告放射科医生对采集时间视而不见,他们被要求对 DL-TSE 和传统 TSE 重建进行定性比较。尽管 DL-TSE 的采集时间更快,但与传统 TSE 相比,139/232(60%)例的 DL-TSE 对较小结构的描绘更好,72/232(31%)例的 DL-TSE 与之相当,21/232(9%)例的 DL-TSE 较差。总体而言,在 124/232 例(53%)病例中,放射科医生更倾向于使用 DL-TSE 重建,而在 65/232 例(28%)病例中,放射科医生表示不倾向于使用 DL-TSE 重建,这意味着两者相当。DL-TSE 重建可以缩短采集时间,同时提高空间分辨率并保持图像对比度。从这些结果来看,DL-TSE 在更短的时间内提供了更多或相当的临床价值和实用性。DL-TSE 为进一步缩短整体检查时间和提高患者舒适度提供了机会,同时不会降低诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Abstract. Abstract. Characterising high-risk plaque on cardiac CT. Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design. Lung cancer screening in Australia: The time approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1