Dual-energy CT for occult pelvic fractures: An audit and roc analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13718
Hayley Wong, Christabel Logan, Yun-Jung Jack Tsai, Anthony Doyle
{"title":"Dual-energy CT for occult pelvic fractures: An audit and roc analysis","authors":"Hayley Wong,&nbsp;Christabel Logan,&nbsp;Yun-Jung Jack Tsai,&nbsp;Anthony Doyle","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is an increasing incidence of hip and pelvic fractures with an ageing population. Accurate and timely diagnosis is important in the emergency setting. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard, it is a limited resource. Dual energy CT (DECT) is comparable to MRI in detection of bone marrow oedema. Our hospital was the first centre in our country to introduce DECT for occult pelvic fractures. We aimed to describe its utility in occult pelvic fractures since commencement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective study of consecutive pelvic bone CT (conventional or DECT) performed to look for an occult fracture over a 10-month period. Sensitivity and specificity calculated based on clinical and imaging follow-up. ROC study performed where three observers visually interpreted pelvic radiographs, conventional CT and DECT and scored their confidence for an acute fracture from 1 to 5. The null hypothesis was that DECT would not improve observer performance compared with conventional CT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>DECT studies were performed on 178 patients of whom 84 (47%) had acute fractures. Sensitivity on audit was 99% and specificity was 100%. ROC analysis showed that, for all observers, the area under curve increased from radiograph to conventional CT to DECT. The difference between conventional CT and DECT was statistically significant for all observers where metal implants were not present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DECT improves accuracy compared to conventional CT in the diagnosis of occult pelvic fractures and should be used for this indication when available.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 5","pages":"540-544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There is an increasing incidence of hip and pelvic fractures with an ageing population. Accurate and timely diagnosis is important in the emergency setting. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard, it is a limited resource. Dual energy CT (DECT) is comparable to MRI in detection of bone marrow oedema. Our hospital was the first centre in our country to introduce DECT for occult pelvic fractures. We aimed to describe its utility in occult pelvic fractures since commencement.

Methods

Retrospective study of consecutive pelvic bone CT (conventional or DECT) performed to look for an occult fracture over a 10-month period. Sensitivity and specificity calculated based on clinical and imaging follow-up. ROC study performed where three observers visually interpreted pelvic radiographs, conventional CT and DECT and scored their confidence for an acute fracture from 1 to 5. The null hypothesis was that DECT would not improve observer performance compared with conventional CT.

Results

DECT studies were performed on 178 patients of whom 84 (47%) had acute fractures. Sensitivity on audit was 99% and specificity was 100%. ROC analysis showed that, for all observers, the area under curve increased from radiograph to conventional CT to DECT. The difference between conventional CT and DECT was statistically significant for all observers where metal implants were not present.

Conclusion

DECT improves accuracy compared to conventional CT in the diagnosis of occult pelvic fractures and should be used for this indication when available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐匿性骨盆骨折的双能量 CT:审计和 ROC 分析。
简介随着人口老龄化,髋部和骨盆骨折的发病率不断上升。在急诊情况下,准确及时的诊断非常重要。虽然磁共振成像(MRI)是黄金标准,但其资源有限。双能 CT(DECT)在检测骨髓水肿方面与核磁共振成像不相上下。我院是我国首家引进 DECT 用于隐匿性骨盆骨折的中心。我们的目的是描述 DECT 在隐匿性骨盆骨折中的应用:方法:对10个月内为寻找隐匿性骨折而进行的连续骨盆骨CT(传统或DECT)进行回顾性研究。根据临床和影像学随访结果计算灵敏度和特异性。进行ROC研究,由三名观察者对骨盆X光片、传统CT和DECT进行视觉解读,并对急性骨折的可信度从1到5进行评分。零假设是,与传统 CT 相比,DECT 不会改善观察者的表现:对178名患者进行了DECT检查,其中84人(47%)患有急性骨折。审计灵敏度为 99%,特异性为 100%。ROC 分析表明,对所有观察者而言,从射线照相到传统 CT 再到 DECT,曲线下面积都在增加。在没有金属植入物的情况下,所有观察者的传统 CT 和 DECT 之间的差异都具有统计学意义:结论:与传统 CT 相比,DECT 提高了诊断隐匿性骨盆骨折的准确性,因此在有条件的情况下应将其用于这一适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Abstract. Abstract. Characterising high-risk plaque on cardiac CT. Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design. Lung cancer screening in Australia: The time approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1