Development and validation of the Telepsychology Facilitators Scale: A national study.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1037/ser0000870
Alexandra L Silverman, Jack D Watson, Mia E Dini, Tiffanie Vargas, Bradford S Pierce, Paul B Perrin
{"title":"Development and validation of the Telepsychology Facilitators Scale: A national study.","authors":"Alexandra L Silverman, Jack D Watson, Mia E Dini, Tiffanie Vargas, Bradford S Pierce, Paul B Perrin","doi":"10.1037/ser0000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study developed and validated the Telepsychology Facilitators Scale (TFS), a novel measure that uses the theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model as frameworks to assess factors that influence psychologists' openness to using telepsychology. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, an online sample of 2,619 psychologists completed initial items considered for the TFS, along with a measure assessing their actual use of telepsychology. The sample was split in half, with a preliminary exploratory factor analysis ultimately revealing a 13-item general scale with four distinct subscales (Positive Attitudes, Facilitating Infrastructure, Organizational Support, and External Policies). Higher scores on each subscale positively correlated with psychologists' percentage of patient treatment conducted with telepsychology. The exploratory factor analysis subscale structure was subsequently supported via confirmatory factory analyses of a four-factor structure and bifactor structure (tested separately) with the other half of the sample, revealing adequate model fit for both models and similar convergent validity. The TFS may help the field assess the potential barriers and drivers of telepsychology use among psychologists and be used to inform future organizational and policy efforts to increase telepsychology implementation and use across health service settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed and validated the Telepsychology Facilitators Scale (TFS), a novel measure that uses the theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model as frameworks to assess factors that influence psychologists' openness to using telepsychology. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, an online sample of 2,619 psychologists completed initial items considered for the TFS, along with a measure assessing their actual use of telepsychology. The sample was split in half, with a preliminary exploratory factor analysis ultimately revealing a 13-item general scale with four distinct subscales (Positive Attitudes, Facilitating Infrastructure, Organizational Support, and External Policies). Higher scores on each subscale positively correlated with psychologists' percentage of patient treatment conducted with telepsychology. The exploratory factor analysis subscale structure was subsequently supported via confirmatory factory analyses of a four-factor structure and bifactor structure (tested separately) with the other half of the sample, revealing adequate model fit for both models and similar convergent validity. The TFS may help the field assess the potential barriers and drivers of telepsychology use among psychologists and be used to inform future organizational and policy efforts to increase telepsychology implementation and use across health service settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程心理学促进者量表的开发与验证:全国性研究。
本研究开发并验证了远程心理学促进因素量表(TFS),这是一种新颖的测量方法,它以合理行动理论和技术接受模型为框架,评估影响心理学家使用远程心理学的开放性的因素。在 COVID-19 大流行之初,2,619 名心理学家在线完成了 TFS 的初始项目,并对他们实际使用远程心理学的情况进行了评估。样本被分成两半,初步的探索性因子分析最终揭示了一个包含 13 个项目的总量表,其中有四个不同的子量表(积极态度、促进性基础设施、组织支持和外部政策)。每个子量表的得分越高,心理学家通过远程心理学治疗病人的比例就越高。随后,通过对另一半样本进行四因素结构和双因素结构(分别测试)的确认性工厂分析,探索性因素分析的子量表结构得到了支持,结果显示这两个模型都具有充分的拟合性和相似的收敛效度。TFS 可以帮助该领域评估心理学家使用远程心理学的潜在障碍和驱动因素,并为未来的组织和政策工作提供信息,以提高远程心理学在医疗服务机构中的实施和使用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
Equity and access of a civilian-based crisis response model. An evaluation of youth mental health first aid training with law enforcement officers. Implementing family-based interventions in opioid treatment programs: Preferences for method of delivery. Professional firefighters: Findings from the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel. A qualitative study of special operations forces chaplaincy teams' relationship building for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1