[A Multicenter randomized comparative study of dementia nursing practice skills development programs for nurses in acute care hospitals: A Comparison of person-centered care and dementia-type-specific programs].

Mizue Suzuki, Takuya Kanamori, Tomoyoshi Naito, Keigo Inagaki, Hiromi Yoshimura, Soichiro Mimuro, Ikuko Sakai, Keisuke Sawaki, Kimiyo Matsushita, Nanayo Sasaki, Tetsuro Ishihara, Fumiko Ohba, Kaori Ishigaki, Chieko Kawashima, Jun Yagi, Chihiro Terada, Chieko Ikeda, Yoshimi Tatsuka, Masumi Sugimura, Misuzu Yamanashi, Satomi Uchida, Miho Shimoyama, Tomohiro Miyagishima, Mika Suzuki
{"title":"[A Multicenter randomized comparative study of dementia nursing practice skills development programs for nurses in acute care hospitals: A Comparison of person-centered care and dementia-type-specific programs].","authors":"Mizue Suzuki, Takuya Kanamori, Tomoyoshi Naito, Keigo Inagaki, Hiromi Yoshimura, Soichiro Mimuro, Ikuko Sakai, Keisuke Sawaki, Kimiyo Matsushita, Nanayo Sasaki, Tetsuro Ishihara, Fumiko Ohba, Kaori Ishigaki, Chieko Kawashima, Jun Yagi, Chihiro Terada, Chieko Ikeda, Yoshimi Tatsuka, Masumi Sugimura, Misuzu Yamanashi, Satomi Uchida, Miho Shimoyama, Tomohiro Miyagishima, Mika Suzuki","doi":"10.3143/geriatrics.61.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present multicenter randomized controlled trial explored the effectiveness of a person-centered care program (intervention group) and a dementia-type-specific program (control group) for nurses in acute-care hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hospitals in Prefecture A were randomly allocated to two groups (an intervention group and a control group), and a study of these groups was conducted from July 2021 to January 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 participants were included in the study: 58 in the control group and 100 in the intervention group. In a comparison of assessment values immediately after the course, three months later, and six months later for both the intervention and control groups, \"expertise in dementia nursing,\" \"medical expertise in dementia, \" and \"confidence in nursing older people with dementia\" were all significantly higher than before the course. Significant improvements in the intervention group's \"knowledge of dementia\" and \"sense of dignity\" on the ethical sensitivity scale were found immediately after the course compared to baseline, three months later, and six months later and were also significantly greater than the control group in terms of the amount of change. In the control group's \"unique care tailored to cognitive function and the person,\" there were significant improvements in the ratings immediately after the course and three and six months after the course compared to baseline, with significantly greater amounts of change than in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The person-centered care program for nurses led to improvements in the knowledge about dementia and awareness of the dignity of ethical sensitivity. In addition, the type of dementia program had a significant influence on medical knowledge and unique care tailored to the cognitive function and the individual patient. Further outcome evaluations of physical restraint rates as a quality of care in nursing practice are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":35593,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.61.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present multicenter randomized controlled trial explored the effectiveness of a person-centered care program (intervention group) and a dementia-type-specific program (control group) for nurses in acute-care hospitals.

Methods: Seven hospitals in Prefecture A were randomly allocated to two groups (an intervention group and a control group), and a study of these groups was conducted from July 2021 to January 2022.

Results: A total of 158 participants were included in the study: 58 in the control group and 100 in the intervention group. In a comparison of assessment values immediately after the course, three months later, and six months later for both the intervention and control groups, "expertise in dementia nursing," "medical expertise in dementia, " and "confidence in nursing older people with dementia" were all significantly higher than before the course. Significant improvements in the intervention group's "knowledge of dementia" and "sense of dignity" on the ethical sensitivity scale were found immediately after the course compared to baseline, three months later, and six months later and were also significantly greater than the control group in terms of the amount of change. In the control group's "unique care tailored to cognitive function and the person," there were significant improvements in the ratings immediately after the course and three and six months after the course compared to baseline, with significantly greater amounts of change than in the intervention group.

Conclusion: The person-centered care program for nurses led to improvements in the knowledge about dementia and awareness of the dignity of ethical sensitivity. In addition, the type of dementia program had a significant influence on medical knowledge and unique care tailored to the cognitive function and the individual patient. Further outcome evaluations of physical restraint rates as a quality of care in nursing practice are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[针对急症护理医院护士的痴呆症护理实践技能发展项目的多中心随机比较研究:以人为本的护理与痴呆症类型特定计划的比较]。
目的:本多中心随机对照试验探讨了针对急诊医院护士的以人为本的护理项目(干预组)和针对痴呆类型的项目(对照组)的有效性:A县的7家医院被随机分配到两组(干预组和对照组),并于2021年7月至2022年1月对这两组进行了研究:共有 158 人参与了研究:结果:共有 158 人参加了研究:58 人在对照组,100 人在干预组。在课程结束后、三个月后和六个月后,对干预组和对照组的评估值进行比较,发现 "痴呆症护理专业知识"、"痴呆症医学知识 "和 "护理老年痴呆症患者的信心 "均明显高于课程前。与基线相比,干预组的 "痴呆症知识 "和伦理敏感性量表中的 "尊严感 "在课程结束后的第一时间、三个月后和六个月后都有明显改善,而且在变化幅度上也明显高于对照组。对照组的 "根据认知功能和个人情况量身定制的独特护理 "在课程结束后立即、三个月后和六个月后的评分与基线相比均有显著改善,且变化幅度明显大于干预组:以人为本的护士护理课程提高了护士对痴呆症的认识,并增强了护士对道德敏感性尊严的意识。此外,痴呆症项目的类型对医学知识和针对认知功能和患者个体的独特护理也有重大影响。有必要对作为护理实践中护理质量的身体约束率进行进一步的结果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
[Postnatal epigenome-mediated aging control and global trends]. [Outline of blood base biomarkers]. [Association between working in small-scale cultivated land as a daily-life task and the physical and cognitive functions among elderly people in hilly and mountainous areas]. [Table of Contents].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1