Clinical Staging of Prostaglandin-Associated Periorbitopathy Syndrome in Glaucoma: A Review from Asia.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2024.2361001
Catherine Liu, Tina Wong, Dexter Leung, Hae-Young Lopilly Park, Tin Aung, Makoto Aihara, Manchima Makornwattana, Seng Kheong Fang, Ki Ho Park, Christopher Leung
{"title":"Clinical Staging of Prostaglandin-Associated Periorbitopathy Syndrome in Glaucoma: A Review from Asia.","authors":"Catherine Liu, Tina Wong, Dexter Leung, Hae-Young Lopilly Park, Tin Aung, Makoto Aihara, Manchima Makornwattana, Seng Kheong Fang, Ki Ho Park, Christopher Leung","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2361001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Topical prostaglandin analogues are commonly used to treat patients with glaucoma, but may cause periocular and periorbital complications known as prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy syndrome (PAPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted on PAPS. Given the lack of consensus on grading PAPS, glaucoma specialists from Asia convened to evaluate current PAPS grading systems and propose additional considerations in grading PAPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Existing grading systems are limited by the lack of specificity in defining grades and consideration for patients' subjective perception of symptoms. Patient-reported symptoms (e.g., via a self-assessment tool) and additional clinical assessments (e.g., exophthalmometry, lid laxity, differences between tonometry results, baseline measurements, and external ocular photographs) would be beneficial for grading PAPS systematically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective management of PAPS could be facilitated by a common clinical grading system to consistently and accurately diagnose and characterise symptoms. Further research is required to validate specific recommendations and approaches to stage and monitor PAPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"424-428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2361001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Topical prostaglandin analogues are commonly used to treat patients with glaucoma, but may cause periocular and periorbital complications known as prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy syndrome (PAPS).

Methods: A literature review was conducted on PAPS. Given the lack of consensus on grading PAPS, glaucoma specialists from Asia convened to evaluate current PAPS grading systems and propose additional considerations in grading PAPS.

Results: Existing grading systems are limited by the lack of specificity in defining grades and consideration for patients' subjective perception of symptoms. Patient-reported symptoms (e.g., via a self-assessment tool) and additional clinical assessments (e.g., exophthalmometry, lid laxity, differences between tonometry results, baseline measurements, and external ocular photographs) would be beneficial for grading PAPS systematically.

Conclusions: Effective management of PAPS could be facilitated by a common clinical grading system to consistently and accurately diagnose and characterise symptoms. Further research is required to validate specific recommendations and approaches to stage and monitor PAPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼前列腺素相关眼周病综合征的临床分期:亚洲综述。
目的:外用前列腺素类似物常用于治疗青光眼患者,但可能引起眼周和眶周并发症,即前列腺素相关眼周病综合征(PAPS):方法:对 PAPS 进行了文献综述。鉴于对 PAPS 的分级缺乏共识,来自亚洲的青光眼专家召开会议,对现有的 PAPS 分级系统进行评估,并提出了 PAPS 分级的其他注意事项:结果:现有的分级系统在定义分级和考虑患者对症状的主观感受方面缺乏特异性,因而受到限制。患者报告的症状(如通过自我评估工具)和额外的临床评估(如眼球外部测量、眼睑松弛、眼压测量结果之间的差异、基线测量结果和外部眼部照片)将有助于对 PAPS 进行系统分级:结论:采用通用的临床分级系统对症状进行一致、准确的诊断和描述,有助于对 PAPS 进行有效管理。还需要进一步的研究来验证对 PAPS 进行分期和监测的具体建议和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
期刊最新文献
Susac Syndrome: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management with an Emphasis on Ophthalmic Involvement. Tear Film and Dry Eye Characteristics as Predictors of Photophobia in 374 Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Risk Factors for Eye and Orbital Injuries Related to Electric Scooters and Off-Road Vehicles. Lacrimal History - Part VII: Doyens of Dacryology Series - The Contributions from the Anatomical School of Padua: Andreas Vesalius, Gabriele Falloppio, and Giovanni Battista Morgagni. Recent Progression of Pathogenesis and Treatment for Diabetic Cataracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1