The Rounds Efficiency Index: A Novel Physics-Based Construct for Patient- and Family-Centered Rounds.

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2022-006971
Krista Tuomela, Abiye Agbeh, Fatima Anibaba, Heather Toth, Amanda Rogers, Kelsey Porada, Kelly Lynch, Jennifer Hadjiev, Michael C Weisgerber, Sarah Corey Bauer
{"title":"The Rounds Efficiency Index: A Novel Physics-Based Construct for Patient- and Family-Centered Rounds.","authors":"Krista Tuomela, Abiye Agbeh, Fatima Anibaba, Heather Toth, Amanda Rogers, Kelsey Porada, Kelly Lynch, Jennifer Hadjiev, Michael C Weisgerber, Sarah Corey Bauer","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2022-006971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Efficiently conducting patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) is challenging, particularly without a measure of efficiency. In physics, efficiency is the ratio of work output to work input. We sought to evaluate PFCR efficiency via a novel construct rooted in physics. Our objectives were to (1) Establish baseline work output for clinical work (CW), educational effectiveness (EE), and family experience (FE); (2) establish baseline work input for rounds length (RL); and (3) begin preliminary construction of a rounds efficiency index (REI) as a measure of PFCR efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four components of rounds efficiency were collected on 5 inpatient acute care teams during a baseline period. CW consisted of the percentage of daily orders placed on rounds. EE was assessed via survey for trainees and FE by families. RL was recorded in minutes per patient. During an 8-week intensive period, the REI (reported as %) was calculated as a ratio of work output/work input using aggregate mean/median ratings for CW, EE, FE, and RL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data included 809 orders, 28 EE ratings, 21 FE ratings, and RL mean of 11.4 minutes per patient. During the intensive period, the median team-specific weekly REI for the end versus beginning of the academic year was 58% and 52.5% (P = .17), respectively. The median REI during the start and end of the block was 49% and 57% (P = .15), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study assessed 4 components of efficiency (CW, EE, FE, RL) and calculated REI allowing for a preliminary tool to measure rounding efficiency. With this, targeted interventions can improve PFCR efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2022-006971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Efficiently conducting patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) is challenging, particularly without a measure of efficiency. In physics, efficiency is the ratio of work output to work input. We sought to evaluate PFCR efficiency via a novel construct rooted in physics. Our objectives were to (1) Establish baseline work output for clinical work (CW), educational effectiveness (EE), and family experience (FE); (2) establish baseline work input for rounds length (RL); and (3) begin preliminary construction of a rounds efficiency index (REI) as a measure of PFCR efficiency.

Methods: Four components of rounds efficiency were collected on 5 inpatient acute care teams during a baseline period. CW consisted of the percentage of daily orders placed on rounds. EE was assessed via survey for trainees and FE by families. RL was recorded in minutes per patient. During an 8-week intensive period, the REI (reported as %) was calculated as a ratio of work output/work input using aggregate mean/median ratings for CW, EE, FE, and RL.

Results: Baseline data included 809 orders, 28 EE ratings, 21 FE ratings, and RL mean of 11.4 minutes per patient. During the intensive period, the median team-specific weekly REI for the end versus beginning of the academic year was 58% and 52.5% (P = .17), respectively. The median REI during the start and end of the block was 49% and 57% (P = .15), respectively.

Conclusions: The study assessed 4 components of efficiency (CW, EE, FE, RL) and calculated REI allowing for a preliminary tool to measure rounding efficiency. With this, targeted interventions can improve PFCR efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
查房效率指数:以病人和家庭为中心的查房中基于物理学的新结构。
背景和目的:高效开展以患者和家属为中心的查房(PFCR)具有挑战性,尤其是在没有效率衡量标准的情况下。在物理学中,效率是指工作输出与工作输入的比率。我们试图通过一个植根于物理学的新概念来评估 PFCR 的效率。我们的目标是:(1) 为临床工作(CW)、教育效果(EE)和家庭体验(FE)建立基线工作产出;(2) 为查房长度(RL)建立基线工作投入;(3) 开始初步构建查房效率指数(REI),作为全科医生培训效率的衡量标准:方法:在基线期间,对 5 个住院急症护理团队收集了查房效率的四个组成部分。CW 包括每日查房订单的百分比。EE 通过对学员的调查和家属的 FE 进行评估。RL 以每位患者的分钟数为单位进行记录。在为期 8 周的强化培训期间,利用对 CW、EE、FE 和 RL 的总平均值/中位值评分,计算出 REI(以百分比形式报告),作为工作产出/工作投入的比率:基线数据包括 809 份医嘱、28 个 EE 评级、21 个 FE 评级和每个患者 11.4 分钟的 RL 平均值。在强化期,学年结束时与学年开始时的团队每周REI中位数分别为58%和52.5%(P = .17)。学段开始和结束时的REI中位数分别为49%和57%(P = .15):这项研究评估了效率的 4 个组成部分(CW、EE、FE、RL),并计算了 REI,从而为测量舍入效率提供了初步工具。有了这一工具,有针对性的干预措施就能提高四舍五入的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
A National Analysis of General Pediatric Inpatient Unit Closures and Openings, 2011-2018. Are Children's Hospitals Doing Enough to Address the Climate Crisis? A Mandate to Mitigate Bias. Potential Bias in Social Work Consultations in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting. Are Child Access Prevention Laws Associated With Fewer Pediatric Firearm Injuries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1