Dynamic association between suicidal ambivalence and suicide risk among individuals with a history of suicide attempts.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13096
Clemens Fartacek, Reinhold Fartacek, Günter K Schiepek, Josef Sturm, Wolfgang Aichhorn, Martin Plöderl
{"title":"Dynamic association between suicidal ambivalence and suicide risk among individuals with a history of suicide attempts.","authors":"Clemens Fartacek, Reinhold Fartacek, Günter K Schiepek, Josef Sturm, Wolfgang Aichhorn, Martin Plöderl","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide risk is highly fluctuating. There is a need for predictors of short-term change in suicide risk to optimize risk assessment and treatment, especially among individuals who already attempted suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on 1776 daily assessments of 16 former psychiatric inpatients with a history of suicide attempts, we examined how suicidal ambivalence and, respectively, wish to die (WTD) and wish to live (WTL) predicted same-day and change in perceived suicide risk (i.e., next-day perceived suicide risk, controlled for same-day perceived suicide risk) in multilevel regression models. Additionally, based on the assumptions of nonlinear dynamics, we examined the associations between levels of fluctuations in the WTD/WTL and perceived suicide risk within the same time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suicidal ambivalence, WTD, and a WTL significantly correlated with same-day suicide risk. Suicidal ambivalence and WTD significantly predicted change in suicide risk. Fluctuations in WTD were significantly associated with concurrent suicide risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that suicidal ambivalence and WTD are drivers of suicide risk among individuals who already attempted suicide. The association between fluctuations in WTD and suicide risk was small and warrants further investigation on the practical utility as a warning sign.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Suicide risk is highly fluctuating. There is a need for predictors of short-term change in suicide risk to optimize risk assessment and treatment, especially among individuals who already attempted suicide.

Methods: Based on 1776 daily assessments of 16 former psychiatric inpatients with a history of suicide attempts, we examined how suicidal ambivalence and, respectively, wish to die (WTD) and wish to live (WTL) predicted same-day and change in perceived suicide risk (i.e., next-day perceived suicide risk, controlled for same-day perceived suicide risk) in multilevel regression models. Additionally, based on the assumptions of nonlinear dynamics, we examined the associations between levels of fluctuations in the WTD/WTL and perceived suicide risk within the same time period.

Results: Suicidal ambivalence, WTD, and a WTL significantly correlated with same-day suicide risk. Suicidal ambivalence and WTD significantly predicted change in suicide risk. Fluctuations in WTD were significantly associated with concurrent suicide risk.

Conclusion: The results suggest that suicidal ambivalence and WTD are drivers of suicide risk among individuals who already attempted suicide. The association between fluctuations in WTD and suicide risk was small and warrants further investigation on the practical utility as a warning sign.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有自杀未遂史者的自杀矛盾心理与自杀风险之间的动态关联。
目的:自杀风险波动很大。我们需要对自杀风险的短期变化进行预测,以优化风险评估和治疗,尤其是对已尝试过自杀的患者:根据对 16 名有自杀未遂史的前精神病住院患者进行的 1776 次每日评估,我们在多层次回归模型中研究了自杀矛盾心理以及求死愿望(WTD)和求生愿望(WTL)分别如何预测当日感知到的自杀风险和自杀风险的变化(即次日感知到的自杀风险,控制当日感知到的自杀风险)。此外,基于非线性动力学假设,我们还研究了同一时期内WTD/WTL的波动水平与感知到的自杀风险之间的关联:自杀矛盾心理、WTD 和 WTL 与当天的自杀风险显著相关。自杀矛盾心理和 WTD 对自杀风险的变化有明显的预测作用。WTD的波动与同时发生的自杀风险明显相关:结果表明,自杀矛盾心理和WTD是已尝试自杀者自杀风险的驱动因素。WTD的波动与自杀风险之间的关联较小,需要进一步研究其作为警示信号的实际效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Predictors and patterns of suicidal ideation disclosures among American adults. Suicide decision-making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide. Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress. Threat perceptions, defensive behaviors, and the perceived suicide prevention value of specific firearm storage practices. Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1