Technological advances in lower-limb tele-rehabilitation: A review of literature.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20556683241259256
Alireza Ettefagh, Atena Roshan Fekr
{"title":"Technological advances in lower-limb tele-rehabilitation: A review of literature.","authors":"Alireza Ettefagh, Atena Roshan Fekr","doi":"10.1177/20556683241259256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tele-rehabilitation is a healthcare practice that leverages technology to provide rehabilitation services remotely to individuals in their own homes or other locations. With advancements in remote monitoring and Artificial Intelligence, automatic tele-rehabilitation systems that can measure joint angles, recognize exercises, and provide feedback based on movement analysis are being developed. Such platforms can offer valuable information to clinicians for improved care planning. However, with various methods and sensors being used, understanding their pros, cons, and performance is important. This paper reviews and compares the performance of recent vision-based, wearable, and pressure-sensing technologies used in lower limb tele-rehabilitation systems over the past 10 years (from 2014 to 2023). We selected studies that were published in English and focused on joint angle estimation, activity recognition, and exercise assessment. Vision-based approaches were the most common, accounting for 42% of studies. Wearable technology followed at approximately 37%, and pressure-sensing technology appeared in 21% of studies. Identified gaps include a lack of uniformity in reported performance metrics and evaluation methods, a need for cross-subject validation, inadequate testing with patients and older adults, restricted sets of exercises evaluated, and a scarcity of comprehensive datasets on lower limb exercises, especially those involving movements while lying down.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241259256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tele-rehabilitation is a healthcare practice that leverages technology to provide rehabilitation services remotely to individuals in their own homes or other locations. With advancements in remote monitoring and Artificial Intelligence, automatic tele-rehabilitation systems that can measure joint angles, recognize exercises, and provide feedback based on movement analysis are being developed. Such platforms can offer valuable information to clinicians for improved care planning. However, with various methods and sensors being used, understanding their pros, cons, and performance is important. This paper reviews and compares the performance of recent vision-based, wearable, and pressure-sensing technologies used in lower limb tele-rehabilitation systems over the past 10 years (from 2014 to 2023). We selected studies that were published in English and focused on joint angle estimation, activity recognition, and exercise assessment. Vision-based approaches were the most common, accounting for 42% of studies. Wearable technology followed at approximately 37%, and pressure-sensing technology appeared in 21% of studies. Identified gaps include a lack of uniformity in reported performance metrics and evaluation methods, a need for cross-subject validation, inadequate testing with patients and older adults, restricted sets of exercises evaluated, and a scarcity of comprehensive datasets on lower limb exercises, especially those involving movements while lying down.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢远程康复的技术进步:文献综述。
远程康复是一种医疗保健实践,它利用技术为个人在自己家中或其他地点提供远程康复服务。随着远程监控和人工智能技术的进步,目前正在开发能够测量关节角度、识别运动并根据运动分析提供反馈的自动远程康复系统。这些平台可为临床医生提供宝贵的信息,以改进护理计划。然而,由于使用的方法和传感器多种多样,了解它们的优缺点和性能非常重要。本文回顾并比较了过去 10 年(2014 年至 2023 年)用于下肢远程康复系统的最新视觉技术、可穿戴技术和压力传感技术的性能。我们选取了以英语发表的研究,这些研究侧重于关节角度估计、活动识别和运动评估。基于视觉的方法最为常见,占研究总数的 42%。可穿戴技术约占 37%,压力感应技术占 21%。已发现的不足包括:所报告的性能指标和评估方法缺乏统一性、需要进行跨受试者验证、对患者和老年人的测试不足、评估的运动集有限,以及缺乏下肢运动的综合数据集,尤其是涉及躺下时运动的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence approach for detecting and classifying abnormal behaviour in older adults using wearable sensors. Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses. Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults. Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery. Inclusive rehabilitation and assistive technologies development: An exploration of considerations, principles, and stakeholder engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1