Toward Alleviating Clinician Documentation Burden: A Scoping Review of Burden Reduction Efforts.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787007
Elizabeth A Sloss, Shawna Abdul, Mayfair A Aboagyewah, Alicia Beebe, Kathleen Kendle, Kyle Marshall, S Trent Rosenbloom, Sarah Rossetti, Aaron Grigg, Kevin D Smith, Rebecca G Mishuris
{"title":"Toward Alleviating Clinician Documentation Burden: A Scoping Review of Burden Reduction Efforts.","authors":"Elizabeth A Sloss, Shawna Abdul, Mayfair A Aboagyewah, Alicia Beebe, Kathleen Kendle, Kyle Marshall, S Trent Rosenbloom, Sarah Rossetti, Aaron Grigg, Kevin D Smith, Rebecca G Mishuris","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Studies have shown that documentation burden experienced by clinicians may lead to less direct patient care, increased errors, and job dissatisfaction. Implementing effective strategies within health care systems to mitigate documentation burden can result in improved clinician satisfaction and more time spent with patients. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding evidence-based interventions to reduce documentation burden.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The objective of this review was to identify and comprehensively summarize the state of the science related to documentation burden reduction efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Following Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched gray literature and used Google Scholar to ensure a thorough review. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction was performed and a table of evidence was created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 34 articles were included in the review, published between 2016 and 2022, with a majority focusing on the United States. The efforts described can be categorized into medical scribes, workflow improvements, educational interventions, user-driven approaches, technology-based solutions, combination approaches, and other strategies. The outcomes of these efforts often resulted in improvements in documentation time, workflow efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of health system documentation burden reduction efforts. The positive outcomes reported in the literature emphasize the potential effectiveness of these efforts. However, more research is needed to identify universally applicable best practices, and considerations should be given to the transfer of burden among members of the health care team, quality of education, clinician involvement, and evaluation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"15 3","pages":"446-455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Studies have shown that documentation burden experienced by clinicians may lead to less direct patient care, increased errors, and job dissatisfaction. Implementing effective strategies within health care systems to mitigate documentation burden can result in improved clinician satisfaction and more time spent with patients. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding evidence-based interventions to reduce documentation burden.

Objectives:  The objective of this review was to identify and comprehensively summarize the state of the science related to documentation burden reduction efforts.

Methods:  Following Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched gray literature and used Google Scholar to ensure a thorough review. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction was performed and a table of evidence was created.

Results:  A total of 34 articles were included in the review, published between 2016 and 2022, with a majority focusing on the United States. The efforts described can be categorized into medical scribes, workflow improvements, educational interventions, user-driven approaches, technology-based solutions, combination approaches, and other strategies. The outcomes of these efforts often resulted in improvements in documentation time, workflow efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient interactions.

Conclusion:  This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of health system documentation burden reduction efforts. The positive outcomes reported in the literature emphasize the potential effectiveness of these efforts. However, more research is needed to identify universally applicable best practices, and considerations should be given to the transfer of burden among members of the health care team, quality of education, clinician involvement, and evaluation methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻临床医生的文档负担:减轻负担工作的范围审查。
背景:研究表明,临床医生所承受的文档记录负担可能会导致对患者的直接护理减少、错误增加以及对工作的不满。在医疗保健系统中实施有效的策略来减轻文档记录负担,可以提高临床医生的满意度,让他们有更多的时间与患者在一起。然而,关于减轻文档负担的循证干预措施的文献还存在空白:本综述旨在确定并全面总结与减轻文档负担工作相关的科学现状:按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的《证据综述手册》和《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述》(PRISMA-ScR)指南,我们对多个数据库进行了全面检索,包括 PubMed、Medline、Embase、CINAHL Complete、Scopus 和 Web of Science。此外,我们还搜索了灰色文献,并使用谷歌学术(Google Scholar)来确保审查的全面性。两名审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,然后进行全文审阅,由第三名审稿人解决任何不一致之处。进行数据提取并创建证据表:共有 34 篇文章被纳入审查范围,这些文章发表于 2016 年至 2022 年之间,其中大部分集中在美国。所述工作可分为医疗抄写员、工作流程改进、教育干预、用户驱动方法、基于技术的解决方案、组合方法和其他策略。这些工作的成果通常能够改善记录时间、工作流程效率、医疗服务提供者满意度以及与患者的互动:本范围综述全面总结了医疗系统在减少文档负担方面所做的努力。文献中报道的积极成果强调了这些努力的潜在有效性。然而,还需要更多的研究来确定普遍适用的最佳实践,并应考虑医疗团队成员之间的负担转移、教育质量、临床医生的参与以及评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Special_Issue_Teaching_and_Training_Future_Health_Informaticians: Managing the transition from tradition to innovation of the Heidelberg/Heilbronn Medical Informatics Master's Program. Effects of Aligning Residency Note Templates with CMS Evaluation and Management Documentation Requirements. Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening. Optimizing Resident Charge Capture with Disappearing Help Text in Note Templates. Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1