Inpatient versus Outpatient Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Nationwide Cost Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1177/10556656241256916
Idean Roohani, Dylan G Choi, Eloise W Stanton, Collean Trotter, Marvee Turk, Priyanka Naidu, Mark M Urata, William P Magee, Jeffrey A Hammoudeh
{"title":"Inpatient versus Outpatient Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Nationwide Cost Analysis.","authors":"Idean Roohani, Dylan G Choi, Eloise W Stanton, Collean Trotter, Marvee Turk, Priyanka Naidu, Mark M Urata, William P Magee, Jeffrey A Hammoudeh","doi":"10.1177/10556656241256916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare postoperative outcomes and costs between inpatient and outpatient ABG in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional/national.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>Patients who underwent ABG (n = 6649) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012-2021. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were matched using coarsened exact matching.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measure(s): </strong>Thirty-day readmission, reoperation, and complications. A modified Markov model was developed to estimate the cost difference between cohorts. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 3718 patients were included, of which 1859 patients were in each hospital-setting cohort. The inpatient cohort had significantly higher rates of reoperations (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.032) and surgical site infections (0.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.018). The total cost of outpatient ABG was estimated to be $10,824 vs. $20,955 for inpatient ABG, resulting in $10,131 cost savings per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that all 10,000 simulations resulted in consistent cost savings for the outpatient cohort that ranged from $8000 to $24,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient ABG has become increasingly more popular over the past ten years, with a majority of cases being performed in the ambulatory setting. If deemed safe for the individual patient, outpatient ABG may confer a lower risk of nosocomial complications and offer significant cost savings to the healthcare economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241256916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes and costs between inpatient and outpatient ABG in the United States.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Multi-institutional/national.

Patients and participants: Patients who underwent ABG (n = 6649) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012-2021. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were matched using coarsened exact matching.

Main outcomes measure(s): Thirty-day readmission, reoperation, and complications. A modified Markov model was developed to estimate the cost difference between cohorts. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: After matching, 3718 patients were included, of which 1859 patients were in each hospital-setting cohort. The inpatient cohort had significantly higher rates of reoperations (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.032) and surgical site infections (0.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.018). The total cost of outpatient ABG was estimated to be $10,824 vs. $20,955 for inpatient ABG, resulting in $10,131 cost savings per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that all 10,000 simulations resulted in consistent cost savings for the outpatient cohort that ranged from $8000 to $24,000.

Conclusions: Outpatient ABG has become increasingly more popular over the past ten years, with a majority of cases being performed in the ambulatory setting. If deemed safe for the individual patient, outpatient ABG may confer a lower risk of nosocomial complications and offer significant cost savings to the healthcare economy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院与门诊牙槽骨移植术:全国成本分析。
目的:比较美国住院病人和门诊病人 ABG 的术后效果和成本:比较美国住院病人和门诊病人 ABG 的术后效果和费用:设计:回顾性队列:患者和参与者:接受 ABG 的患者(n = 6649):2012-2021 年间,在国家外科质量改进计划儿科数据库中确定了接受 ABG 的患者(n = 6649)。住院病人和门诊病人队列采用粗精确匹配法进行匹配:30天再入院、再次手术和并发症。建立了一个改进的马尔可夫模型来估算组群间的成本差异。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析:结果:经过匹配后,共纳入 3718 名患者,其中 1859 名患者属于各医院设置的队列。住院患者队列的再手术率(0.6% 对 0.2%;P = 0.032)和手术部位感染率(0.8% 对 0.2%;P = 0.018)明显更高。门诊 ABG 的总成本估计为 10,824 美元,而住院 ABG 为 20,955 美元,每位患者可节省 10,131 美元的成本。概率敏感性分析表明,所有 10,000 次模拟都为门诊病人队列节省了 8000 到 24,000 美元不等的成本:在过去十年中,门诊 ABG 越来越受欢迎,大多数病例都是在门诊环境中进行的。如果认为对患者个人是安全的,门诊 ABG 可能会降低发生院内并发症的风险,并为医疗保健经济节省大量成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Standardization of Videorecorded Speech Samples for Children with Cleft Palate: Methods to Facilitate High-Quality Speech Outcomes Data Collection. Influence of Cleft Lip and Palate on Children's Recorder, Flute, and Clarinet Performance. Bridging Gaps in Health Literacy for Cleft Lip and Palate: Correspondence. Imaging Yield and Surgical Outcomes of Nasal, Medial Brow, Forehead, and Scalp Dermoid Cysts. Patient-Reported Esthetic Outcomes Following Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adult Patients with a Cleft lip and Palate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1