Risk factor evaluation of cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O to stop air leakage during mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.2187
Hong-Lei Wu, Yue-Hong Wu, Wang-Qin Shen, Jia-Hai Shi, Yan-Ping Zhu, Yang-Hui Xu, Hong-Wu Shen, Lei Ding
{"title":"Risk factor evaluation of cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to stop air leakage during mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Hong-Lei Wu, Yue-Hong Wu, Wang-Qin Shen, Jia-Hai Shi, Yan-Ping Zhu, Yang-Hui Xu, Hong-Wu Shen, Lei Ding","doi":"10.1002/nop2.2187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The commonly recommended endotracheal tube cuff pressure is 20-30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. However, some patients require a cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to prevent air leakage. The study aims to determine the risk factors that contribute to the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to prevent air leakage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-centre prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit of three hospitals between March 2020 and July 2022 were included. The endotracheal tube cuff pressure to prevent air leakage was determined using the minimal occlusive volume technique. The patient demographics and clinical information were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 patients were included. Among these patients, 55 (19.37%) patients required a cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to prevent air leakage. The multivariate logistic regression results revealed that the surgical operation (odds ratio [OR]: 8.485, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.066-67.525, p = 0.043) was inversely associated with the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, while the oral intubation route (OR: 0.127, 95% CI: 0.022-0.750, p = 0.023) and cuff inner diameter minus tracheal area (OR: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.933-0.966, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Therefore, a significant number of patients require an endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to prevent air leakage. Several factors, including the surgical operation, intubation route, and difference between the cuff inner diameter and tracheal area at the T3 vertebra, should be considered when determining the appropriate cuff pressure during mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The commonly recommended endotracheal tube cuff pressure is 20-30 cmH2O. However, some patients require a cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O to prevent air leakage. The study aims to determine the risk factors that contribute to the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O to prevent air leakage.

Design: A multi-centre prospective observational study.

Methods: Eligible patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit of three hospitals between March 2020 and July 2022 were included. The endotracheal tube cuff pressure to prevent air leakage was determined using the minimal occlusive volume technique. The patient demographics and clinical information were collected.

Results: A total of 284 patients were included. Among these patients, 55 (19.37%) patients required a cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O to prevent air leakage. The multivariate logistic regression results revealed that the surgical operation (odds ratio [OR]: 8.485, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.066-67.525, p = 0.043) was inversely associated with the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O, while the oral intubation route (OR: 0.127, 95% CI: 0.022-0.750, p = 0.023) and cuff inner diameter minus tracheal area (OR: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.933-0.966, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with the endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O. Therefore, a significant number of patients require an endotracheal tube cuff pressure of >30 cmH2O to prevent air leakage. Several factors, including the surgical operation, intubation route, and difference between the cuff inner diameter and tracheal area at the T3 vertebra, should be considered when determining the appropriate cuff pressure during mechanical ventilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对机械通气时袖带压力大于 30 cmH2O 以阻止漏气的风险因素进行评估:前瞻性观察研究。
目的:通常推荐的气管导管袖带压力为 20-30 cmH2O。然而,一些患者需要大于 30 cmH2O 的袖带压力来防止漏气。本研究旨在确定导致气管导管袖带压力大于 30 cmH2O 以防止漏气的风险因素:多中心前瞻性观察研究:纳入2020年3月至2022年7月期间在三家医院重症监护室接受机械通气的合格患者。采用最小闭塞容积技术确定气管导管袖带压力,以防止漏气。收集了患者的人口统计学和临床信息:结果:共纳入 284 名患者。结果:共纳入 284 例患者,其中 55 例(19.37%)患者需要大于 30 cmH2O 的充气罩囊压力来防止漏气。多变量逻辑回归结果显示,手术操作(几率比[OR]:8.485,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.066-67.5%)对漏气的发生率较低:1.066-67.525,p = 0.043)与气管导管袖带压力>30 cmH2O成反比,而口腔插管途径(OR:0.127,95% CI:0.022-0.750,p = 0.023)和袖带内径减去气管面积(OR:0.949,95% CI:0.933-0.966,p 30 cmH2O)与气管导管袖带压力>30 cmH2O成反比。因此,相当多的患者需要气管导管袖带压力>30 cmH2O 以防止漏气。在确定机械通气期间合适的充气罩囊压力时,应考虑多种因素,包括手术操作、插管途径以及 T3 椎体处充气罩囊内径与气管面积之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
The mediating role of psychological resilience in the effect of strength of religious faith on coping with stress in people with type 2 diabetes: A SEM analysis Nurse experiences and perspectives with missed nursing care during COVID‐19: A qualitative study A comparison of work characteristics and health status between Korean and US hospital nurses Practicing nurses' and nursing students' perceptions of climate change: A scoping review Health literacy and diabetes information preferences among Chinese immigrants: An Australian cross‐sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1