Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment
{"title":"Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A retrospective survey study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center.</p></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><p>Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600–800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800–2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><p>Minimal and conventional COS treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><p>The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test and χ<sup>2</sup> tests, with a significance level.</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73012,"journal":{"name":"F&S science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X24000296/pdfft?md5=f71ef9ef35ce3a99702aba69414b9ed3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666335X24000296-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X24000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment.
Design
A retrospective survey study.
Setting
Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center.
Patient(s)
Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600–800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800–2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023.
Intervention(s)
Minimal and conventional COS treatments.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 tests, with a significance level.
Result(s)
During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment.
Conclusion(s)
Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.
在体外受精(IVF)治疗中,最小控制卵巢刺激(COS)和体外成熟(IVM)对传统 COS 的副作用。
目的:评估体外成熟(IVM)中最小控制卵巢刺激(COS)下的卵母细胞获取经验和副作用:评估体外成熟(IVM)中最小控制卵巢刺激(COS)与传统 COS 相比的卵母细胞获取经验和副作用:设计:回顾性调查研究研究对象:西班牙临床体外受精(IVF)治疗中心:数据收集自2022年4月至2023年11月接受最小COS(n=110;600-800 IU FSH)体外受精和常规COS捐卵(n=48;1800-2600 IU FSH)的受试者:主要结果指标:卵巢刺激过程中和OPU后最常见的副作用、满意度以及推荐或重复最小或常规COS的可能性。统计分析包括曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验,显著性水平设定为 p结果:在最小 COS 过程中,大多数受试者没有出现乳房胀痛(86%)、盆腔或腹痛(76%)、恶心或呕吐(96%)和出血(96%)。取卵后,大多数受试者(75%)没有出现盆腔或腹部疼痛。最常见的副作用是腹部肿胀(52%)。与传统的 COS 周期相比,最小 COS 受试者报告的取卵后疼痛明显减少,33% 的受试者没有疼痛感(对 6%;P=0.0011),剧烈疼痛程度降低(5% 对 19%;P=0.0097),需要服用止痛药的受试者减少(25% 对 54%;P=0.0003)。此外,85%的妇女对最小刺激非常满意,并愿意推荐或重复这种治疗方法:结论:减少卵巢刺激的激素剂量对受试者有好处,这表明对于不能或不愿接受常规控制性卵巢过度刺激的妇女来说,将最小COS与IVM技术相结合是一种耐受性良好的替代方法。