Remimazolam: its clinical pharmacology and evolving role in anesthesia and sedation practice.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001384
Kenichi Masui
{"title":"Remimazolam: its clinical pharmacology and evolving role in anesthesia and sedation practice.","authors":"Kenichi Masui","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine anesthetic/sedative, designed as a rapidly metabolized carboxylic acid. Since its recent launch, the role of remimazolam in modern anesthesia and sedation practice is still evolving. This review aims to outline the clinical pharmacology and clinical utility of remimazolam to elucidate its potential advantages and limitations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Remimazolam is \"short-acting\" but not ultra-short-acting compared with propofol based on context-sensitive decrement times. But compared to propofol, the availability of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, is considered an advantage, particularly in certain emergency situations such as in patients with difficult airways. However, because flumazenil is shorter acting than remimazolam when remimazolam accumulates or is present in a high concentration, the reappearance of remimazolam sedation may occur after the initial reversal of anesthesia/sedation from flumazenil administration. Although it is beneficial that remimazolam causes less respiratory depression and hypotension than propofol, serious respiratory depression and hypotension can still occur. Remimazolam administration causes minimal or no pain on injection. Remimazolam is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting than inhaled anesthetics, but propofol is clearly superior in this regard. The anesthetic/sedative effects may be prolonged by severe hepatic impairment; remimazolam tolerance can occur in long-term benzodiazepine users.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Remimazolam may be beneficial to use in procedural sedation and general anesthesia for patients with difficult airways or hemodynamic instability. Further clinical studies with remimazolam are warranted to identify the potential benefits in other settings and patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine anesthetic/sedative, designed as a rapidly metabolized carboxylic acid. Since its recent launch, the role of remimazolam in modern anesthesia and sedation practice is still evolving. This review aims to outline the clinical pharmacology and clinical utility of remimazolam to elucidate its potential advantages and limitations.

Recent findings: Remimazolam is "short-acting" but not ultra-short-acting compared with propofol based on context-sensitive decrement times. But compared to propofol, the availability of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, is considered an advantage, particularly in certain emergency situations such as in patients with difficult airways. However, because flumazenil is shorter acting than remimazolam when remimazolam accumulates or is present in a high concentration, the reappearance of remimazolam sedation may occur after the initial reversal of anesthesia/sedation from flumazenil administration. Although it is beneficial that remimazolam causes less respiratory depression and hypotension than propofol, serious respiratory depression and hypotension can still occur. Remimazolam administration causes minimal or no pain on injection. Remimazolam is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting than inhaled anesthetics, but propofol is clearly superior in this regard. The anesthetic/sedative effects may be prolonged by severe hepatic impairment; remimazolam tolerance can occur in long-term benzodiazepine users.

Summary: Remimazolam may be beneficial to use in procedural sedation and general anesthesia for patients with difficult airways or hemodynamic instability. Further clinical studies with remimazolam are warranted to identify the potential benefits in other settings and patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雷马唑仑:其临床药理学及其在麻醉和镇静实践中不断发展的作用。
审查目的:雷马唑仑是一种新型苯二氮卓麻醉/镇静剂,设计为快速代谢的羧酸。自最近上市以来,雷马唑仑在现代麻醉和镇静实践中的作用仍在不断发展。本综述旨在概述雷马唑仑的临床药理学和临床实用性,以阐明其潜在的优势和局限性:最新研究结果:与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑是 "短效 "的,但不是超短效的。但与异丙酚相比,可使用苯二氮卓拮抗剂氟马唑尼被认为是一种优势,尤其是在某些紧急情况下,如呼吸道困难的患者。然而,由于氟马西尼的作用时间比瑞马唑仑短,当瑞马唑仑蓄积或浓度较高时,在最初使用氟马西尼逆转麻醉/镇静后,可能会再次出现瑞马唑仑镇静。虽然与异丙酚相比,瑞马唑仑引起的呼吸抑制和低血压较少,这一点是有益的,但仍可能发生严重的呼吸抑制和低血压。注射 Remimazolam 时疼痛极轻或没有疼痛。与吸入麻醉剂相比,雷马唑仑的术后恶心和呕吐症状较轻,但丙泊酚在这方面明显更胜一筹。严重肝功能损害可能会延长麻醉/镇静效果;长期使用苯二氮卓类药物的患者可能会对瑞马唑仑产生耐受性:小结:对于呼吸困难或血流动力学不稳定的患者,使用雷马唑仑进行手术镇静和全身麻醉可能是有益的。有必要对瑞马唑仑进行进一步的临床研究,以确定其在其他环境和患者群体中的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning: implications and applications for ambulatory anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients. Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm. More than pacemakers and defibrillators: perioperative management of implantable devices for patient safety. Safety amid the scalpels: creating psychological safety in the operating room.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1