Anesthesiologist-directed care for elective gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.

IF 1.9 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Minerva gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5985.24.03656-8
Mauro Manno, Giuliano F Bonura, Paola Soriani, Roberta Pileggi, Giovanni Aragona, Vincenzo Cennamo, Antonio Colecchia, Rita Conigliaro, Marco DI Marco, Carlo Fabbri, Lorenzo Fuccio, Rosa F LA Fortezza, Alberto Merighi, Alessandro Mussetto, Giorgio Nervi, Paolo Orsi, Romano Sassatelli, Rocco M Zagari, Paolo Biancheri
{"title":"Anesthesiologist-directed care for elective gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.","authors":"Mauro Manno, Giuliano F Bonura, Paola Soriani, Roberta Pileggi, Giovanni Aragona, Vincenzo Cennamo, Antonio Colecchia, Rita Conigliaro, Marco DI Marco, Carlo Fabbri, Lorenzo Fuccio, Rosa F LA Fortezza, Alberto Merighi, Alessandro Mussetto, Giorgio Nervi, Paolo Orsi, Romano Sassatelli, Rocco M Zagari, Paolo Biancheri","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.24.03656-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedation, ranging from minimal, moderate and deep sedation to general anesthesia, improves patient comfort and procedure quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE). There are currently no comprehensive recommendations on sedation practice in diagnostic and therapeutic GIE. We aimed to investigate real-life sedation practice in elective GIE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicentric observational study across 14 Endoscopy Units in Italy. We recorded consecutive data on all diagnostic procedures performed with Anesthesiologist-directed care (ADC) and all therapeutic procedures performed with ADC or non-Anesthesiologist sedation (NAS) over a three-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dedicated ADC is available five days/week in 28.6% (4/14), four days/week in 21.5% (3/14), three days/week in 35.7% (5/14), two days/week in 7.1% (1/14) and one day/week in 7.1% (1/14) of participating Centers. ADC use for elective diagnostic GIE varied from 18.2% to 75.1% of the total number of procedures performed with ADC among different Centers. ADC use for elective therapeutic GIE varied from 10.8% to 98.9% of the total number of elective therapeutic procedures performed among different Centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the lack of standardization and consequent great variability in sedation practice for elective GIE, with ADC being potentially overused for diagnostic procedures and underused for complex therapeutic procedures. A collaborative effort involving Endoscopists, Anesthesiologist and Institutions is needed to optimize sedation practice in GIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94142,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.24.03656-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sedation, ranging from minimal, moderate and deep sedation to general anesthesia, improves patient comfort and procedure quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE). There are currently no comprehensive recommendations on sedation practice in diagnostic and therapeutic GIE. We aimed to investigate real-life sedation practice in elective GIE.

Methods: We performed a multicentric observational study across 14 Endoscopy Units in Italy. We recorded consecutive data on all diagnostic procedures performed with Anesthesiologist-directed care (ADC) and all therapeutic procedures performed with ADC or non-Anesthesiologist sedation (NAS) over a three-month period.

Results: Dedicated ADC is available five days/week in 28.6% (4/14), four days/week in 21.5% (3/14), three days/week in 35.7% (5/14), two days/week in 7.1% (1/14) and one day/week in 7.1% (1/14) of participating Centers. ADC use for elective diagnostic GIE varied from 18.2% to 75.1% of the total number of procedures performed with ADC among different Centers. ADC use for elective therapeutic GIE varied from 10.8% to 98.9% of the total number of elective therapeutic procedures performed among different Centers.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the lack of standardization and consequent great variability in sedation practice for elective GIE, with ADC being potentially overused for diagnostic procedures and underused for complex therapeutic procedures. A collaborative effort involving Endoscopists, Anesthesiologist and Institutions is needed to optimize sedation practice in GIE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉师指导下的择期胃肠道内窥镜检查:意大利多中心前瞻性观察研究的结果。
背景:从最小镇静、中度镇静、深度镇静到全身麻醉,镇静可提高胃肠镜检查(GIE)中患者的舒适度和手术质量。目前还没有关于诊断性和治疗性 GIE 中镇静做法的全面建议。我们旨在调查择期 GIE 的实际镇静做法:我们在意大利的 14 个内镜室开展了一项多中心观察研究。我们记录了三个月内所有使用麻醉师指导护理(ADC)进行的诊断程序和所有使用ADC或非麻醉师镇静(NAS)进行的治疗程序的连续数据:在参与研究的中心中,28.6%(4/14)的中心每周提供五天的专职 ADC,21.5%(3/14)的中心每周提供四天的专职 ADC,35.7%(5/14)的中心每周提供三天的专职 ADC,7.1%(1/14)的中心每周提供两天的专职 ADC,7.1%(1/14)的中心每周提供一天的专职 ADC。在不同的中心,ADC用于择期诊断性GIE的比例从18.2%到75.1%不等。在不同中心进行的选择性治疗 GIE 手术总数中,ADC 的使用率从 10.8% 到 98.9% 不等:我们的研究凸显了择期GIE镇静实践缺乏标准化,因而存在巨大差异,ADC可能被过度用于诊断程序,而未被充分用于复杂的治疗程序。需要内镜医师、麻醉师和医疗机构通力合作,优化 GIE 的镇静方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of artificial intelligence combined with MDT teaching model in colorectal cancer training teaching. Pancreatic necrosis: a scoping review. Evaluation of the effect of moxibustion therapy combined with press needle stimulation of bilateral Zusanli (ST36) and Neiguan (PC6) points on gastric motility recovery in patients with gastroparesis after pancreatoduodenectomy. Switching rate from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in managing inflammatory bowel diseases is lower than expected. The role and mechanisms of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR in regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in gastric cancer cells and its impact on tumor invasion and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1