Understanding the use of CATI and web-based data collection methods during the pandemic among digitally challenged groups at FQHCs: data from the All of Us Research Program

Soumya Kini, Kimberly Marie Cawi, Dave Duluk, Katrina Yamazaki, Matthew B. McQueen
{"title":"Understanding the use of CATI and web-based data collection methods during the pandemic among digitally challenged groups at FQHCs: data from the All of Us Research Program","authors":"Soumya Kini, Kimberly Marie Cawi, Dave Duluk, Katrina Yamazaki, Matthew B. McQueen","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1379290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The All of Us Research Program (Program) is an ongoing epidemiologic cohort study focused on collecting lifestyle, health, socioeconomic, environmental, and biological data from 1 million US-based participants. The Program has a focus on enrolling populations that are underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a key recruitment stream of UBR participants. The Program is digital by design where participants complete surveys via web-based platform. As many FQHC participants are not digitally ready, recruitment and retention is a challenge, requiring high-touch methods. However, high-touch methods ceased as an option in March 2020 when the Program paused in-person activities because of the pandemic. In January 2021, the Program introduced Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) to help participants complete surveys remotely. This paper aims to understand the association between digital readiness and mode of survey completion (CATI vs. web-based platform) by participants at FQHCs.This study included 2,089 participants who completed one or more surveys via CATI and/or web-based platform between January 28, 2021 (when CATI was introduced) and January 27, 2022 (1 year since CATI introduction).Results show that among the 700 not-digitally ready participants, 51% used CATI; and of the 1,053 digitally ready participants, 30% used CATI for completing retention surveys. The remaining 336 participants had “Unknown/Missing” digital readiness of which, 34% used CATI. CATI allowed survey completion over the phone with a trained staff member who entered responses on the participant's behalf. Regardless of participants' digital readiness, median time to complete retention surveys was longer with CATI compared to web. CATI resulted in fewer skipped responses than the web-based platform highlighting better data completeness. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using CATI for improving response rates in online surveys, especially among populations that are digitally challenged. Analyses provide insights for NIH, healthcare providers, and researchers on the adoption of virtual tools for data collection, telehealth, telemedicine, or patient portals by digitally challenged groups even when in-person assistance continues to remain as an option. It also provides insights on the investment of staff time and support required for virtual administration of tools for health data collection.","PeriodicalId":504480,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Digital Health","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1379290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The All of Us Research Program (Program) is an ongoing epidemiologic cohort study focused on collecting lifestyle, health, socioeconomic, environmental, and biological data from 1 million US-based participants. The Program has a focus on enrolling populations that are underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a key recruitment stream of UBR participants. The Program is digital by design where participants complete surveys via web-based platform. As many FQHC participants are not digitally ready, recruitment and retention is a challenge, requiring high-touch methods. However, high-touch methods ceased as an option in March 2020 when the Program paused in-person activities because of the pandemic. In January 2021, the Program introduced Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) to help participants complete surveys remotely. This paper aims to understand the association between digital readiness and mode of survey completion (CATI vs. web-based platform) by participants at FQHCs.This study included 2,089 participants who completed one or more surveys via CATI and/or web-based platform between January 28, 2021 (when CATI was introduced) and January 27, 2022 (1 year since CATI introduction).Results show that among the 700 not-digitally ready participants, 51% used CATI; and of the 1,053 digitally ready participants, 30% used CATI for completing retention surveys. The remaining 336 participants had “Unknown/Missing” digital readiness of which, 34% used CATI. CATI allowed survey completion over the phone with a trained staff member who entered responses on the participant's behalf. Regardless of participants' digital readiness, median time to complete retention surveys was longer with CATI compared to web. CATI resulted in fewer skipped responses than the web-based platform highlighting better data completeness. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using CATI for improving response rates in online surveys, especially among populations that are digitally challenged. Analyses provide insights for NIH, healthcare providers, and researchers on the adoption of virtual tools for data collection, telehealth, telemedicine, or patient portals by digitally challenged groups even when in-person assistance continues to remain as an option. It also provides insights on the investment of staff time and support required for virtual administration of tools for health data collection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解在大流行期间,在 FQHC 的数字挑战群体中使用 CATI 和基于网络的数据收集方法的情况:来自 "我们所有人 "研究计划的数据
我们所有人研究计划(以下简称 "计划")是一项正在进行的流行病学队列研究,重点是收集 100 万美国参与者的生活方式、健康、社会经济、环境和生物数据。该计划的重点是招募在生物医学研究中代表性不足的人群(UBR)。联邦合格保健中心(FQHC)是招募 UBR 参与者的主要渠道。该计划采用数字化设计,参与者通过网络平台完成调查。由于许多联邦合格保健中心的参与者尚未做好数字化准备,因此招募和留住参与者是一项挑战,需要采用高接触式方法。然而,2020 年 3 月,由于大流行病的影响,该计划暂停了面对面的活动,因此高接触式方法不再作为一种选择。2021 年 1 月,该计划引入了计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI),帮助参与者远程完成调查。本研究包括 2021 年 1 月 28 日(引入 CATI)至 2022 年 1 月 27 日(引入 CATI 1 年)期间通过 CATI 和/或网络平台完成一项或多项调查的 2,089 名参与者。结果显示,在 700 名未做好数字化准备的参与者中,51% 使用了 CATI;在 1,053 名做好数字化准备的参与者中,30% 使用 CATI 完成保留率调查。其余 336 名参与者的数字就绪程度为 "未知/缺失",其中 34% 使用了 CATI。CATI 允许通过电话完成调查,由经过培训的工作人员代表参与者输入答案。无论参与者的数字化准备程度如何,使用 CATI 完成保留率调查所需的中位时间都长于使用网络完成的时间。与基于网络的平台相比,CATI 的跳过回答更少,突出了数据的完整性。这些研究结果表明,使用 CATI 可以有效提高在线调查的回复率,尤其是在有数字挑战的人群中。分析为美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)、医疗保健提供商和研究人员提供了有关数字挑战群体采用虚拟工具进行数据收集、远程保健、远程医疗或患者门户网站的见解,即使亲自协助仍是一种选择。该报告还就虚拟管理健康数据收集工具所需的人员时间和支持投资提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the design and development of a handheld electrocardiogram device in a clinical setting Analyzing the barriers and enablers to internet hospital implementation: a qualitative study of a tertiary hospital using TDF and COM-B framework Smartwatch step counting: impact on daily step-count estimation accuracy A review on over-sampling techniques in classification of multi-class imbalanced datasets: insights for medical problems The need for a refined classification system and national incident reporting system for health information technology-related incidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1