A case series of fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block for chronic pancreatitis pain

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_86_24
B. Jyothi, M. Mitragotri, D. Ladhad, Madhuri S. Kurdi, Mahesh D. Kurugodiyavar, Sanjivani Jadhav
{"title":"A case series of fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block for chronic pancreatitis pain","authors":"B. Jyothi, M. Mitragotri, D. Ladhad, Madhuri S. Kurdi, Mahesh D. Kurugodiyavar, Sanjivani Jadhav","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_86_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Splanchnic nerve block (SPN) with local anesthetic and steroid is used to relieve the pain of chronic pancreatitis. However, it does not provide long-lasting relief. We hypothesize that the use of 70% alcohol will give adequate analgesia for more than months.\n \n \n \n The primary objective was to find out the analgesic efficacy of the use of 70% alcohol with SPN. Secondary objectives included the incidence of side effects, analgesic consumption postintervention, quality of life (QOL) assessed via a self-reported quality of life scale, and repeat block during the 1-year follow-up period.\n \n \n \n Retrospective analysis of all patients with chronic pancreatitis who received bilateral SPN over the last 4 years.\n \n \n \n SPN was performed using the posterior retrocrural approach with the patient in the prone position as described in the literature using a 23 G × 90 mm spinal needle bilaterally at the level of T12 using C-arm/fluoroscopy guidance. Data were collected from the procedure book of the pain clinic and medical records.\n \n \n \n Quantitative data for change in pre- to post-block VAS score was collected using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test.\n \n \n \n The baseline VAS, post-procedure VAS, and VAS at 3 months follow-up was 7.69 ± 1.3,2.44 ± 0.96 and 1.56 ± 1.15. A pairwise comparison of VAS performed between baseline and immediate post-procedure, baseline, and VAS at 3 months was found to be highly significant.\n \n \n \n Fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic SPN with 70% alcohol gives significant pain relief for more than 3 months. It also leads to improvement in 3 months QOL.\n","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_86_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Splanchnic nerve block (SPN) with local anesthetic and steroid is used to relieve the pain of chronic pancreatitis. However, it does not provide long-lasting relief. We hypothesize that the use of 70% alcohol will give adequate analgesia for more than months. The primary objective was to find out the analgesic efficacy of the use of 70% alcohol with SPN. Secondary objectives included the incidence of side effects, analgesic consumption postintervention, quality of life (QOL) assessed via a self-reported quality of life scale, and repeat block during the 1-year follow-up period. Retrospective analysis of all patients with chronic pancreatitis who received bilateral SPN over the last 4 years. SPN was performed using the posterior retrocrural approach with the patient in the prone position as described in the literature using a 23 G × 90 mm spinal needle bilaterally at the level of T12 using C-arm/fluoroscopy guidance. Data were collected from the procedure book of the pain clinic and medical records. Quantitative data for change in pre- to post-block VAS score was collected using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The baseline VAS, post-procedure VAS, and VAS at 3 months follow-up was 7.69 ± 1.3,2.44 ± 0.96 and 1.56 ± 1.15. A pairwise comparison of VAS performed between baseline and immediate post-procedure, baseline, and VAS at 3 months was found to be highly significant. Fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic SPN with 70% alcohol gives significant pain relief for more than 3 months. It also leads to improvement in 3 months QOL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透视引导下神经溶解性脾神经阻滞治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的病例系列
使用局部麻醉剂和类固醇的胰腺神经阻滞术(SPN)可缓解慢性胰腺炎的疼痛。然而,它并不能提供持久的缓解。我们假设使用 70% 的酒精可提供数月以上的充分镇痛。 首要目标是了解使用 70% 酒精和 SPN 的镇痛效果。次要目标包括副作用的发生率、干预后的镇痛剂消耗量、通过自我报告生活质量量表评估的生活质量(QOL)以及 1 年随访期间的重复阻滞情况。 对过去 4 年中接受过双侧 SPN 的所有慢性胰腺炎患者进行回顾性分析。 按照文献中的描述,在C型臂/荧光透视引导下,使用23 G × 90 mm脊柱针在双侧T12水平进行SPN手术。数据来自疼痛诊所的手术记录本和病历。 采用非参数 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验收集阻滞前与阻滞后 VAS 评分变化的定量数据。 基线 VAS、术后 VAS 和 3 个月随访时的 VAS 分别为 7.69 ± 1.3、2.44 ± 0.96 和 1.56 ± 1.15。基线与术后即刻、基线与 3 个月时的 VAS 进行配对比较后发现,结果非常显著。 在透视引导下使用 70% 酒精进行神经溶解 SPN 可明显缓解疼痛,持续时间超过 3 个月。它还能改善 3 个月的 QOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The trapezius plane block: Extended use in perioperative pain management in nerve transfer surgeries. Intermittent apnoea and manual jet ventilation: A successful anesthetic management for infant with acquired Myer-Cotton class III subglottic stenosis undergoing endoscopic balloon dilatation Challenges in the anesthetic management of a pediatric patient with glottic web – A lesson Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke–Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1