Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review

N. Merriman, M. Walsh, Niamh O'Regan, Marie Carrigan, Pamela Hickey, Louise Brent, Catherine Blake
{"title":"Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review","authors":"N. Merriman, M. Walsh, Niamh O'Regan, Marie Carrigan, Pamela Hickey, Louise Brent, Catherine Blake","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13894.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia are prevalent in up to 39% of older adults in acute care, particularly older trauma patients. Undiagnosed NCDs result in poor outcomes, such as increased incidence of depressive symptoms, longer length of stay, and mortality. Objective This study aims to identify the diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of NCDs in older trauma patients in acute settings. Design Systematic review protocol. Literature search Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) will be searched for journal articles. Search terms related to NCDs, delirium and cognitive screening tools, and diagnostic accuracy will be included. Study selection criteria Cross-sectional, prospective, or retrospective cohort studies of adults aged ≥60 post-trauma, in an acute setting, will be included where the study aimed to validate a screening tool for detection of 1) delirium or 2) cognitive impairment, or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical decision, based on standardised diagnostic criteria or a validated tool. Data synthesis Two review authors will conduct study selection, data extraction, and appraisal. Data will be extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) checklist. Studies will be assessed for methodological quality by two independent review authors using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Narrative summaries will be generated describing risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability. Quantitative synthesis of study findings will be conducted. Conclusion This systematic review will aim to identify screening tools with the best diagnostic accuracy for detection of 1) delirium and 2) cognitive impairment or dementia in adults aged ≥60 post-trauma in acute care settings. Results will inform clinical practice to enhance the probability of patients with NCDs receiving appropriate care and management. Registration PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024518730 (11/03/2024).","PeriodicalId":508744,"journal":{"name":"HRB Open Research","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13894.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia are prevalent in up to 39% of older adults in acute care, particularly older trauma patients. Undiagnosed NCDs result in poor outcomes, such as increased incidence of depressive symptoms, longer length of stay, and mortality. Objective This study aims to identify the diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of NCDs in older trauma patients in acute settings. Design Systematic review protocol. Literature search Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) will be searched for journal articles. Search terms related to NCDs, delirium and cognitive screening tools, and diagnostic accuracy will be included. Study selection criteria Cross-sectional, prospective, or retrospective cohort studies of adults aged ≥60 post-trauma, in an acute setting, will be included where the study aimed to validate a screening tool for detection of 1) delirium or 2) cognitive impairment, or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical decision, based on standardised diagnostic criteria or a validated tool. Data synthesis Two review authors will conduct study selection, data extraction, and appraisal. Data will be extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) checklist. Studies will be assessed for methodological quality by two independent review authors using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Narrative summaries will be generated describing risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability. Quantitative synthesis of study findings will be conducted. Conclusion This systematic review will aim to identify screening tools with the best diagnostic accuracy for detection of 1) delirium and 2) cognitive impairment or dementia in adults aged ≥60 post-trauma in acute care settings. Results will inform clinical practice to enhance the probability of patients with NCDs receiving appropriate care and management. Registration PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024518730 (11/03/2024).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测创伤后老年人神经认知障碍的筛查工具的诊断测试准确性:系统性审查方案
背景 神经认知障碍 (NCD),包括谵妄、认知障碍或痴呆,在接受急症护理的老年人,尤其是老年创伤患者中的发病率高达 39%。未确诊的 NCD 会导致不良后果,如增加抑郁症状的发生率、延长住院时间和死亡率。目的 本研究旨在确定筛查工具的诊断测试准确性,以检测急诊环境中老年创伤患者的 NCDs。设计 系统综述方案。文献检索 将在电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Cochrane Library)中检索期刊论文。与非传染性疾病、谵妄和认知筛查工具以及诊断准确性相关的搜索词将被纳入其中。研究选择标准 对急性环境中创伤后年龄≥60 岁的成年人进行的横断面、前瞻性或回顾性队列研究将被纳入,这些研究的目的是根据标准化诊断标准或经验证的工具,对照临床决策的参考标准,验证用于检测 1) 谵妄或 2) 认知障碍或痴呆的筛查工具。数据综合 两位综述作者将进行研究选择、数据提取和评估。将根据诊断测试准确性研究系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA)清单提取数据。两位独立的综述作者将使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具对研究进行方法学质量评估。将生成叙述性摘要,说明偏倚风险和适用性方面的问题。将对研究结果进行定量综合。结论 本系统性综述旨在确定具有最佳诊断准确性的筛查工具,以便在急症护理环境中检测创伤后年龄≥60 岁成人的 1) 谵妄和 2) 认知障碍或痴呆。研究结果将为临床实践提供参考,从而提高非传染性疾病患者接受适当护理和管理的概率。注册 PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024518730(11/03/2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of social deprivation on development and progression of diabetic kidney disease Factors influencing implementation of digital cardiac rehabilitation: A qualitative analysis of health workers perspectives Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Financial Incentive Interventions for Health Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review Protocol Delivery of Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) in the UK and Ireland 2019-2022 Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a national research strategy for paramedicine in Ireland: Findings from a focus group study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1