Selection of the Best Students’ Leader in UPNM using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

Muhamad Danial Haikal Muhd Zamzuri, Fazilatulaili Ali, Ruzanna Mat Jusoh, Mohd Fahmi Mohamad Amran, Dilum Dissanayake
{"title":"Selection of the Best Students’ Leader in UPNM using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method","authors":"Muhamad Danial Haikal Muhd Zamzuri, Fazilatulaili Ali, Ruzanna Mat Jusoh, Mohd Fahmi Mohamad Amran, Dilum Dissanayake","doi":"10.37934/araset.46.1.2838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As university students, it is crucial for them to understand the process of selecting the most suitable student leader based on the current criteria. This research aims to gather input from the high committee of the student club, providing a set of guidelines for students to identify the appropriate criteria for selecting a fitting leader within the university. Additionally, this study serves to motivate aspiring candidates who wish to take up leadership roles, inspiring them to refine the criteria identified through the study. At Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM), there exist several clubs that function as representatives of student leadership. Each club has shown their own trend leadership criteria in accordance with students’ obsecration. Employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, this research aimed to establish a ranking of the top student clubs at UPNM. The outcomes can serve as a point of reference for managing the selection by Student Council Representatives (SRC) and simplifying student decision-making. The study encompasses crucial criteria distilled from the questionnaire, with communication, creativity, commitment, and teamwork emerging as the four paramount factors. The method commonly uses a multiple-choice question (MCQ) to select which criteria are most relevant then rank the criteria by using the AHP method. This study involves the high committee of the 5 clubs in UPNM as an expert to compare 3 of the selected clubs as an alternative with 60% of the respondents were male, and 40% were females. The result shows that communication (0.52) is the highest criteria followed by teamwork, commitment and creative with 0.26, 0.14 and 0.08 weightage respectively. Hence, this also affects the alternatives with the highest is Debate Club followed by Peers Leader and MPP UPNM respectively.","PeriodicalId":506443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.46.1.2838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As university students, it is crucial for them to understand the process of selecting the most suitable student leader based on the current criteria. This research aims to gather input from the high committee of the student club, providing a set of guidelines for students to identify the appropriate criteria for selecting a fitting leader within the university. Additionally, this study serves to motivate aspiring candidates who wish to take up leadership roles, inspiring them to refine the criteria identified through the study. At Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM), there exist several clubs that function as representatives of student leadership. Each club has shown their own trend leadership criteria in accordance with students’ obsecration. Employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, this research aimed to establish a ranking of the top student clubs at UPNM. The outcomes can serve as a point of reference for managing the selection by Student Council Representatives (SRC) and simplifying student decision-making. The study encompasses crucial criteria distilled from the questionnaire, with communication, creativity, commitment, and teamwork emerging as the four paramount factors. The method commonly uses a multiple-choice question (MCQ) to select which criteria are most relevant then rank the criteria by using the AHP method. This study involves the high committee of the 5 clubs in UPNM as an expert to compare 3 of the selected clubs as an alternative with 60% of the respondents were male, and 40% were females. The result shows that communication (0.52) is the highest criteria followed by teamwork, commitment and creative with 0.26, 0.14 and 0.08 weightage respectively. Hence, this also affects the alternatives with the highest is Debate Club followed by Peers Leader and MPP UPNM respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用层次分析法评选 UPNM 的最佳学生干部
作为大学生,了解根据现行标准挑选最合适的学生干部的过程至关重要。本研究旨在收集学生社团高级委员会的意见,为学生提供一套指导方针,帮助他们确定合适的标准,在大学内挑选合适的领导者。此外,本研究还可激励有志于担任领导职务的候选人,激励他们完善研究中确定的标准。在马来西亚国立师范大学(UPNM),有几个社团是学生领导力的代表。每个社团都根据学生的意愿制定了自己的领导力标准。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP),旨在对马来西亚国民大学的顶级学生社团进行排名。其结果可作为学生会代表(SRC)管理选择和简化学生决策的参考点。研究涵盖了从调查问卷中提炼出的关键标准,其中沟通、创造力、承诺和团队合作是最重要的四个因素。该方法通常使用多选题(MCQ)来选择最相关的标准,然后使用 AHP 方法对标准进行排序。本研究以 UPNM 5 个俱乐部的高级委员会作为专家,比较 3 个被选中的俱乐部作为备选,其中 60% 的受访者为男性,40% 为女性。结果显示,沟通(0.52)是最高标准,其次是团队精神、承诺和创造力,权重分别为 0.26、0.14 和 0.08。因此,这也影响了备选方案,其中最高的是辩论俱乐部,其次分别是朋辈领袖和 MPP UPNM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimising Layout of a Left-Turn Bypass Intersection under Mixed Traffic Flow using Simulation: A Case Study in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Design and Fabrication of Compact MIMO Array Antenna with Tapered Feed Line for 5G Applications Analysing Flipped Classroom Themes Trends in Computer Science Education (2007–2023) Using CiteSpace The Comparison of Fuzzy Regression Approaches with and without Clustering Method in Predicting Manufacturing Income Unveiling Effective CSCL Constructs for STEM Education in Malaysia and Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1