Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1177/00220221241255673
Cristina E. Salvador, Cindel J. M. White, Ting Ai
{"title":"Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others","authors":"Cristina E. Salvador, Cindel J. M. White, Ting Ai","doi":"10.1177/00220221241255673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People are motivated to punish others who commit immoral actions when they believe the person willingly committed such an act. Compared with European American individuals, East Asian individuals are more punitive of wrongdoings, yet are less likely to attribute actions to the person. Here, we drew on research in cultural psychology to test the prediction that Chinese individuals are more punitive in part because they are more self-critical than European American individuals. This prediction would imply that cultural differences in punishment are most pronounced in judgments of oneself (vs. others) and largely driven by a difference in self-enhancement motives. To test this prediction, we conducted two studies, where 1,563 participants imagined immoral (vs. moral) actions performed by themselves or others. We then measured self-enhancement (how much participants perceived the immoral act impacts self-esteem) and attributions (how much participants perceived the immoral act is due to the person). As predicted, Chinese individuals punished immoral behavior more than European American individuals, which was explained by Chinese individuals being less self-enhancing, as indicated by a greater perception that immoral actions will negatively impact their self-esteem. Dispositional attributions predicted punishment regardless of culture. This work highlights how cultural differences in self-enhancement are key to understanding moral judgments and their cultural variation.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"24 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241255673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People are motivated to punish others who commit immoral actions when they believe the person willingly committed such an act. Compared with European American individuals, East Asian individuals are more punitive of wrongdoings, yet are less likely to attribute actions to the person. Here, we drew on research in cultural psychology to test the prediction that Chinese individuals are more punitive in part because they are more self-critical than European American individuals. This prediction would imply that cultural differences in punishment are most pronounced in judgments of oneself (vs. others) and largely driven by a difference in self-enhancement motives. To test this prediction, we conducted two studies, where 1,563 participants imagined immoral (vs. moral) actions performed by themselves or others. We then measured self-enhancement (how much participants perceived the immoral act impacts self-esteem) and attributions (how much participants perceived the immoral act is due to the person). As predicted, Chinese individuals punished immoral behavior more than European American individuals, which was explained by Chinese individuals being less self-enhancing, as indicated by a greater perception that immoral actions will negatively impact their self-esteem. Dispositional attributions predicted punishment regardless of culture. This work highlights how cultural differences in self-enhancement are key to understanding moral judgments and their cultural variation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁是你最大的批评者?自我和他人道德判断的文化差异
当人们认为他人是自愿做出不道德的行为时,他们就会有惩罚他人的动机。与欧美人相比,东亚人对不法行为的惩罚性更强,但却不太可能将行为归咎于个人。在此,我们借鉴了文化心理学的研究成果,来验证这样一个预测:中国人更具有惩罚性,部分原因是他们比欧美人更具有自我批评精神。这一预测意味着,惩罚方面的文化差异在对自己(与他人)的判断中最为明显,而且主要是由自我提升动机的差异所驱动的。为了验证这一预测,我们进行了两项研究,让 1563 名参与者想象自己或他人的不道德(与道德)行为。然后,我们测量了自我提升(参与者认为不道德行为对自尊的影响程度)和归因(参与者认为不道德行为对个人的影响程度)。正如预测的那样,中国人比欧美人更惩罚不道德行为,这是因为中国人的自我提升程度较低,他们认为不道德行为会对他们的自尊产生负面影响。无论文化如何,倾向性归因都能预测惩罚。这项研究强调了自我提升方面的文化差异是理解道德判断及其文化差异的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Plug-and-(Dis)Play Epitope Engineering on Ring-like Particles: Rational Design of Multivalent Immunoreagents for Diagnostics. PEGylated Hemicyanine-Based Dual-Mode Phototherapy Platform with Robust Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity against High Priority Pathogens. Correction to "Magnesium Ion/Gallic Acid MOF-Laden Multifunctional Acellular Matrix Hydrogels for Diabetic Wound Healing". Recent Developments in Antimicrobial Hydrogel for Wound Healing. In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Darolutamide Encapsulated Lipid-Extruded PEGylated Liposomal Formulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1