Enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students in a Canadian rehabilitation centre

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1336559
Jordan Eggiman-Ketter, Benjamin Derrough, Dalton Wolfe, Janelle Unger
{"title":"Enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students in a Canadian rehabilitation centre","authors":"Jordan Eggiman-Ketter, Benjamin Derrough, Dalton Wolfe, Janelle Unger","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1336559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study aims to identify a comprehensive set of enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students at a Canadian rehabilitation centre.A researcher conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with individuals from four key stakeholder groups (i.e., rehabilitation centre leadership, clinicians, university clinical coordinators, and health and rehabilitation students). Interviews and data analysis followed the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is designed to identify possible cognitive, affective, social, and environmental influences on program implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and two researchers coded data independently to identify the major themes of enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning approach to rehabilitation care.From a total of 12 interviews, domains of the TDF were identified to represent overarching themes, which were (1) enablers (i.e., reinforcement, beliefs and consequences, optimism, professional identity, knowledge, and skills), (2) barriers (i.e., environment/resources and beliefs and capabilities), and (3) program development (i.e., goals and evaluation that was not previously a TDF domain). A list of recommendations for implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program was created that represented qualitative data from each stakeholder group.This study provides insight into the potential enablers and barriers to developing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students within rehabilitation centres. This type of program could enhance educational curriculums, student and clinical experiences, and patient outcomes. In this study, the findings inform recommendations for developing an interdisciplinary program in teaching hospitals and explore their potential impact. Future research and pilot studies must be conducted to fully understand the effects of implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning approach within rehabilitation centres.","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1336559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to identify a comprehensive set of enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students at a Canadian rehabilitation centre.A researcher conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with individuals from four key stakeholder groups (i.e., rehabilitation centre leadership, clinicians, university clinical coordinators, and health and rehabilitation students). Interviews and data analysis followed the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is designed to identify possible cognitive, affective, social, and environmental influences on program implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and two researchers coded data independently to identify the major themes of enablers and barriers to implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning approach to rehabilitation care.From a total of 12 interviews, domains of the TDF were identified to represent overarching themes, which were (1) enablers (i.e., reinforcement, beliefs and consequences, optimism, professional identity, knowledge, and skills), (2) barriers (i.e., environment/resources and beliefs and capabilities), and (3) program development (i.e., goals and evaluation that was not previously a TDF domain). A list of recommendations for implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program was created that represented qualitative data from each stakeholder group.This study provides insight into the potential enablers and barriers to developing an interdisciplinary experiential learning program for university students within rehabilitation centres. This type of program could enhance educational curriculums, student and clinical experiences, and patient outcomes. In this study, the findings inform recommendations for developing an interdisciplinary program in teaching hospitals and explore their potential impact. Future research and pilot studies must be conducted to fully understand the effects of implementing an interdisciplinary experiential learning approach within rehabilitation centres.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大康复中心实施大学生跨学科体验式学习计划的有利因素和障碍
这项定性研究旨在确定在加拿大康复中心为大学生实施跨学科体验式学习计划的一整套促进因素和障碍。研究人员对四个主要利益相关群体(即康复中心领导层、临床医生、大学临床协调员以及健康与康复专业学生)的个人进行了一对一的半结构化访谈。访谈和数据分析遵循了理论领域框架(TDF),该框架旨在确定对计划实施可能产生的认知、情感、社会和环境影响。访谈内容被逐字记录,两名研究人员对数据进行独立编码,以确定在康复护理中实施跨学科体验式学习方法的主要促进因素和障碍主题、从总共 12 个访谈中,确定了代表总体主题的领域,它们是:(1)促进因素(即,强化、信念和后果、乐观主义、专业认同、知识和技能);(2)障碍(即,环境/资源、信念和能力);以及(3)项目开发(即,目标和评估,以前不属于 TDF 领域)。本研究深入探讨了在康复中心内为大学生开发跨学科体验式学习项目的潜在促进因素和障碍。该研究深入探讨了在康复中心内为大学生制定跨学科体验式学习计划的潜在促进因素和障碍,这种计划可以提高教育课程、学生和临床经验以及患者的治疗效果。在这项研究中,研究结果为在教学医院开发跨学科项目提供了建议,并探讨了其潜在影响。必须开展未来研究和试点研究,以充分了解在康复中心实施跨学科体验式学习方法的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study. Counting the costs: understanding the extra costs of living with disability in Indonesia to advance inclusive policies within the SDG framework. Exploring knowledge, perception, and use of surface electromyography in physiotherapy post graduate trainees in Italy: a single center preliminary survey. Distinguishing pain profiles among individuals with long COVID. Qualitative evaluation of factors influencing adherence to virtual exercise programs for people with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1