Distribution of Foot Arch Type and Associated Symptoms in Medical Students at Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v76i6.267251
Siranya Paecharoen, Thanutchaporn Kritsanapraneet
{"title":"Distribution of Foot Arch Type and Associated Symptoms in Medical Students at Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University","authors":"Siranya Paecharoen, Thanutchaporn Kritsanapraneet","doi":"10.33192/smj.v76i6.267251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the distribution of foot arch type, associated symptoms, and factors associated with moderate to severe pain\nMaterials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was collected data from 5th year medical students, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University in academic year 2020. The distribution of foot arch type used the footprint and classified by Harris imprint index (HII), Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI), Staheli index (SI). The associated symptoms were collected into pain and tightness. Pain score was rated by the volunteer using numeric rating scale (NRS) at each foot/leg separately.\nResults: A total of ninety-eight medical students (196 feet) were recruited and analyzed. The distribution of foot arch type by HII, CSI and SI were 1) bilateral normal arched feet: 42.9%, 67.3%, 54.1% 2) bilateral pes planus: 8.2%, 12.2%, 21.4% 3) bilateral pes cavus: 25.5%, 6.1%, 5.1% 4) unilateral pes planus: 2%, 9.2%,15.3% 5) unilateral pes cavus: 21.4%, 5.1%, 4.1%, respectively. The most commonly associated symptom of pes planus was midfoot pain (17%) while pes cavus and normal arched foot were hindfoot pain (22.4% and 17.3%). The factor associated with moderate to severe pain was BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 (OR = 3.23, 95%CI 1.63 - 6.41, p-value = 0.001).\nConclusion: Bilateral normal arched feet were mostly found. Midfoot pain in pes planus and hindfoot pain in pes cavus and normal arched foot were the greatest symptoms. BMI was a risk factor.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i6.267251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the distribution of foot arch type, associated symptoms, and factors associated with moderate to severe pain Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was collected data from 5th year medical students, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University in academic year 2020. The distribution of foot arch type used the footprint and classified by Harris imprint index (HII), Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI), Staheli index (SI). The associated symptoms were collected into pain and tightness. Pain score was rated by the volunteer using numeric rating scale (NRS) at each foot/leg separately. Results: A total of ninety-eight medical students (196 feet) were recruited and analyzed. The distribution of foot arch type by HII, CSI and SI were 1) bilateral normal arched feet: 42.9%, 67.3%, 54.1% 2) bilateral pes planus: 8.2%, 12.2%, 21.4% 3) bilateral pes cavus: 25.5%, 6.1%, 5.1% 4) unilateral pes planus: 2%, 9.2%,15.3% 5) unilateral pes cavus: 21.4%, 5.1%, 4.1%, respectively. The most commonly associated symptom of pes planus was midfoot pain (17%) while pes cavus and normal arched foot were hindfoot pain (22.4% and 17.3%). The factor associated with moderate to severe pain was BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 (OR = 3.23, 95%CI 1.63 - 6.41, p-value = 0.001). Conclusion: Bilateral normal arched feet were mostly found. Midfoot pain in pes planus and hindfoot pain in pes cavus and normal arched foot were the greatest symptoms. BMI was a risk factor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国 Thammasat 大学医学院医学生足弓类型分布及相关症状
目的: 确定足弓类型的分布、相关症状以及与中度和重度疼痛相关的因素:确定足弓类型的分布、相关症状以及与中度至重度疼痛相关的因素:该横断面研究收集了 2020 学年泰国 Thammasat 大学医学院五年级医学生的数据。足弓类型的分布采用足印,并按哈里斯足印指数(HII)、Chippaux-Smirak指数(CSI)和Staheli指数(SI)进行分类。相关症状分为疼痛和紧绷。志愿者使用数字评分量表(NRS)分别对每只脚/每条腿进行疼痛评分:结果:共招募并分析了 98 名医学生(196 只脚)。按 HII、CSI 和 SI 划分的足弓类型分布如下:1)双侧正常足弓:2)双侧扁平足:8.2%、12.2%、21.4% 3)双侧穴状足:25.5%、6.1%、5.1% 4)单侧扁平足:2%、9.2%、15.3% 5)单侧穴状足:21.4%、5.1%、4.1%。与扁平足相关的最常见症状是中足疼痛(17%),而与穴状足和正常足弓相关的症状是后足疼痛(22.4%和17.3%)。与中度至重度疼痛相关的因素是体重指数≥23 kg/m2(OR=3.23,95%CI 1.63 - 6.41,P值=0.001):结论:双侧足弓正常者居多。结论:双侧正常足弓的患者居多,扁平足的中足疼痛、穴状足和正常足弓的后足疼痛是最大的症状。体重指数是一个风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1