High rates of return to sport after suprascapular nerve decompression: an updated systematic review

{"title":"High rates of return to sport after suprascapular nerve decompression: an updated systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Suprascapular nerve decompression (SSND) remains a controversial procedure. In 2018, Momaya et al published the first systematic review of SSND noting satisfactory outcomes with low rates of complications; however, numerous studies published since have noted no benefit in routinely adding SSND to other arthroscopic surgeries, contributing to existing contention regarding the procedure. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated assessment of outcomes after SSND.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To conduct this updated systematic review, a search of PubMed (MEDLINE) for relevant studies published prior to January 21, 2023 was conducted. Outcomes including patient-reported clinical outcomes, return to sport, preoperative and postoperative electrodiagnostic testing, and adverse events were collected and pooled for assessment. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they met Momaya et al’s inclusion criteria and/or reported outcomes following SSND at either the suprascapular notch or spinoglenoid notch.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 730 patients from 33 studies were eligible for inclusion. All patient-reported outcome measure scores including American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon Standardized Shoulder Assessment; Constant-Murley score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Subjective Shoulder Value; University of California–Los Angeles shoulder; and visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly postoperatively, with improvements ranging from 53.5% to 102.6% of preoperative values. Ultimately, 98% (n = 90/92) of patients returned to sport or military duty and 96% of these patients returned at their previous level of activity (n = 48/50) without heterogeneity among rates between studies (<em>P</em> = .176, <em>P</em> = .238, respectively). Preoperative electrodiagnostic testing was conducted in 93% of patients, and 90% had associated abnormal findings. Continued symptoms were noted among 12% of patients (n = 39/322) with significantly different rates observed between studies. Complications from operative management not limited to SSND occurred in 11% of patients (n = 64/576) and reoperations occurred in 3.3% of patients (n = 15/455).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Suprascapular neuropathy treated with SSND significantly improves patient-reported outcomes and is noninferior to similar procedures without SSND. Appropriate clinical diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is required as opposed to a routine adjunct procedure with other arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Ultimately, SSND is associated with high rates of return to sport and relatively low rates of adverse events; however, the risk of continued symptoms and electrodiagnostic test-related complications is an important point on preoperative counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 654-661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Suprascapular nerve decompression (SSND) remains a controversial procedure. In 2018, Momaya et al published the first systematic review of SSND noting satisfactory outcomes with low rates of complications; however, numerous studies published since have noted no benefit in routinely adding SSND to other arthroscopic surgeries, contributing to existing contention regarding the procedure. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated assessment of outcomes after SSND.

Methods

To conduct this updated systematic review, a search of PubMed (MEDLINE) for relevant studies published prior to January 21, 2023 was conducted. Outcomes including patient-reported clinical outcomes, return to sport, preoperative and postoperative electrodiagnostic testing, and adverse events were collected and pooled for assessment. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they met Momaya et al’s inclusion criteria and/or reported outcomes following SSND at either the suprascapular notch or spinoglenoid notch.

Results

In total, 730 patients from 33 studies were eligible for inclusion. All patient-reported outcome measure scores including American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon Standardized Shoulder Assessment; Constant-Murley score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Subjective Shoulder Value; University of California–Los Angeles shoulder; and visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly postoperatively, with improvements ranging from 53.5% to 102.6% of preoperative values. Ultimately, 98% (n = 90/92) of patients returned to sport or military duty and 96% of these patients returned at their previous level of activity (n = 48/50) without heterogeneity among rates between studies (P = .176, P = .238, respectively). Preoperative electrodiagnostic testing was conducted in 93% of patients, and 90% had associated abnormal findings. Continued symptoms were noted among 12% of patients (n = 39/322) with significantly different rates observed between studies. Complications from operative management not limited to SSND occurred in 11% of patients (n = 64/576) and reoperations occurred in 3.3% of patients (n = 15/455).

Conclusion

Suprascapular neuropathy treated with SSND significantly improves patient-reported outcomes and is noninferior to similar procedures without SSND. Appropriate clinical diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is required as opposed to a routine adjunct procedure with other arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Ultimately, SSND is associated with high rates of return to sport and relatively low rates of adverse events; however, the risk of continued symptoms and electrodiagnostic test-related complications is an important point on preoperative counseling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩胛上神经减压术后恢复运动的比率很高:最新系统回顾
背景肩胛上神经减压术(SSND)仍然是一种有争议的手术。2018年,Momaya等人发表了第一篇关于SSND的系统性综述,指出其结果令人满意,并发症发生率较低;然而,此后发表的大量研究指出,在其他关节镜手术中常规添加SSND并无益处,这加剧了目前关于该手术的争议。本研究的目的是对SSND术后的结果进行最新评估。方法为了进行这项最新的系统性综述,我们在PubMed (MEDLINE)上搜索了2023年1月21日之前发表的相关研究。收集的结果包括患者报告的临床结果、运动恢复情况、术前和术后电诊断测试以及不良事件,并进行汇总评估。如果研究符合 Momaya 等人的纳入标准和/或报告了肩胛上切迹或椎骨切迹 SSND 后的结果,则符合纳入条件。所有患者报告的结果评分,包括美国肩肘外科医生标准化肩关节评估;Constant-Murley评分;手臂、肩部和手部残疾;主观肩关节价值;加州大学洛杉矶分校肩关节;以及视觉模拟量表疼痛评分在术后均有显著改善,改善幅度为术前值的53.5%至102.6%。最终,98%(n = 90/92)的患者恢复了运动或服兵役,其中 96% 的患者恢复到了之前的活动水平(n = 48/50),不同研究之间的恢复率没有异质性(分别为 P = .176 和 P = .238)。93%的患者进行了术前电子诊断测试,90%的患者有相关的异常发现。12%的患者(n = 39/322)出现持续症状,不同研究中出现持续症状的比例存在显著差异。11% 的患者(n = 64/576)出现了不局限于 SSND 的手术治疗并发症,3.3% 的患者(n = 15/455)出现了再次手术。需要对肩胛上神经病进行适当的临床诊断,而不是将其作为其他肩关节镜手术的常规辅助手术。最终,SSND 的运动恢复率较高,不良事件发生率相对较低;但是,持续症状和电诊断测试相关并发症的风险是术前咨询的一个要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute compartment syndrome following biceps tendon rupture: a case report. A spontaneously resolved varix in the spinoglenoid notch: a case report. Medialization of shaft of humerus to provide medial buttress and prevent varus collapse in 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: review of the surgical technique. Median nerve entrapment neuropathy: a review on the pronator syndrome. Coracoid osteotomy approach for open free bone grafting of anterior glenoid defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1