Differential Cardiac Responses after Passive Leg Raising.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01180-z
Ricardo Castro, Eduardo Kattan, Glenn Hernández, Jan Bakker
{"title":"Differential Cardiac Responses after Passive Leg Raising.","authors":"Ricardo Castro, Eduardo Kattan, Glenn Hernández, Jan Bakker","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01180-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study retrospectively examined the hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising (PLR) in mechanically ventilated patients during fluid removal before spontaneous breathing trials. In previous studies, we noticed varying cardiac responses after PLR completion, particularly in positive tests. Using a bioreactance monitor, we recorded and analyzed hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume and cardiac index (CI), before and after PLR in post-acute ICU patients. We included 27 patients who underwent 60 PLR procedures. In preload-unresponsive patients, no significant CI changes were observed (CI_t-6 = 3.7 [2.6; 4.7] mL/min/m<sup>2</sup> vs. CI_t9 = 3.3 [2.5; 3.4] mL/min/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.306), while in preload-responsive patients, two distinct CI response types to PLR were identified: a transient peak with immediate return to baseline (CI_t-6 = 2.7 [2.5; 3.1] mL/min/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 3.3 [2.6; 3.8] L/min/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.119) and a sustained CI elevation lasting beyond the PLR maneuver (CI_t-6 = 2.8 [2.3; 2.9] L/min/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 3.3 [2.8; 3.9] ml/min/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.034). The latter was particularly noted when ΔCI during PLR exceeded 25%. Our findings suggest that in certain preload-responsive patients, PLR can induce a more sustained increase in CI, indicating a possible persistent hemodynamic effect. This effect could be due to a combination of autotransfusion and sympathetic activation affecting venous return and vascular tone. Further research in larger cohorts and more comprehensive hemodynamic assessments are warranted to validate these observations and elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms.The Fluid unLoading On Weaning (FLOW) study was prospectively registered under the ID NCT04496583 on 2020-07-29 at ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01180-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study retrospectively examined the hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising (PLR) in mechanically ventilated patients during fluid removal before spontaneous breathing trials. In previous studies, we noticed varying cardiac responses after PLR completion, particularly in positive tests. Using a bioreactance monitor, we recorded and analyzed hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume and cardiac index (CI), before and after PLR in post-acute ICU patients. We included 27 patients who underwent 60 PLR procedures. In preload-unresponsive patients, no significant CI changes were observed (CI_t-6 = 3.7 [2.6; 4.7] mL/min/m2 vs. CI_t9 = 3.3 [2.5; 3.4] mL/min/m2; p = 0.306), while in preload-responsive patients, two distinct CI response types to PLR were identified: a transient peak with immediate return to baseline (CI_t-6 = 2.7 [2.5; 3.1] mL/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.6; 3.8] L/min/m2; p = 0.119) and a sustained CI elevation lasting beyond the PLR maneuver (CI_t-6 = 2.8 [2.3; 2.9] L/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.8; 3.9] ml/min/m2; p = 0.034). The latter was particularly noted when ΔCI during PLR exceeded 25%. Our findings suggest that in certain preload-responsive patients, PLR can induce a more sustained increase in CI, indicating a possible persistent hemodynamic effect. This effect could be due to a combination of autotransfusion and sympathetic activation affecting venous return and vascular tone. Further research in larger cohorts and more comprehensive hemodynamic assessments are warranted to validate these observations and elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms.The Fluid unLoading On Weaning (FLOW) study was prospectively registered under the ID NCT04496583 on 2020-07-29 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被动抬腿后的不同心脏反应
本研究回顾性地检查了机械通气患者在自主呼吸试验前移除液体时被动抬腿(PLR)对血液动力学的影响。在之前的研究中,我们注意到在 PLR 完成后,尤其是在阳性试验中,患者的心脏反应各不相同。我们使用生物反应监测仪记录并分析了急性重症监护病房患者在 PLR 前后的血液动力学参数,包括每搏量和心脏指数(CI)。我们共对 27 名患者进行了 60 次 PLR 治疗。在前负荷无反应的患者中,未观察到明显的 CI 变化(CI_t-6 = 3.7 [2.6; 4.7] mL/min/m2 vs. CI_t9 = 3.3 [2.5; 3.4] mL/min/m2;p = 0.306),而在前负荷有反应的患者中,发现了两种不同的 PLR CI 反应类型:瞬时峰值,并立即恢复到基线(CI_t-6 = 2.7 [2.5; 3.1] mL/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.6; 3.8] L/min/m2; p = 0.119)和持续的 CI 升高,持续时间超过 PLR 操作(CI_t-6 = 2.8 [2.3; 2.9] L/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.8; 3.9] ml/min/m2;p = 0.034)。当 PLR 期间的 ΔCI 超过 25% 时,后者尤为明显。我们的研究结果表明,在某些前负荷反应性患者中,PLR 可引起 CI 更持续的增加,这表明可能存在持续的血流动力学效应。这种效应可能是由于自体输血和交感神经激活共同影响了静脉回流和血管张力。为了验证这些观察结果并阐明可能的潜在机制,有必要在更大的队列和更全面的血流动力学评估中开展进一步研究。断奶后液体卸载(FLOW)研究于 2020-07-29 在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为 NCT04496583。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies. Early prediction of ventricular peritoneal shunt dependency in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients by recurrent neural network-based machine learning using routine intensive care unit data. Relationship between preinduction electroencephalogram patterns and propofol sensitivity in adult patients. The Optimal pressure reactivity index range is disease-specific: A comparison between aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury. Bayesian networks for Risk Assessment and postoperative deficit prediction in intraoperative neurophysiology for brain surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1