Developing attributes and Attribute-Levels for subacromial pain syndrome: A systematic review and qualitative study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae046
Tróndur Frídi Tróndarson, Filip Sandberg Storgaard, Mikkel Bjerre Larsen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Mikkel Bek Clausen, Kristian Damgaard Lyng
{"title":"Developing attributes and Attribute-Levels for subacromial pain syndrome: A systematic review and qualitative study.","authors":"Tróndur Frídi Tróndarson, Filip Sandberg Storgaard, Mikkel Bjerre Larsen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Mikkel Bek Clausen, Kristian Damgaard Lyng","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), the most common cause of shoulder pain, can be treated through different treatments with similar effects. Therefore, in terms of deciding on the right treatment fit, patient preferences need to be understood. We aimed to identify treatment characteristics that delineate interventions (attributes) and corresponding sets of specific categorical range (attribute-levels) for SAPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multiple method study systematically reviewed both qualitative and quantitative studies on patient preferences for treatment of SAPS, which informed semi-structured interviews with nine clinicians and 14 patients. The qualitative data from the interviews was analyzed using the framework analysis formulated by Ritchie and Spencer. Attributes and attribute levels of the systematic review and interviews were summarized and categorized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in 2.607 studies, 16 of which met the eligibility criteria. The review identified 120 potential attributes, which were synthesized into 25 potential attributes. Fourteen new potential attributes were identified through the interviews, equaling a total of 39 attributes across 11 categories. Levels for 37 attributes were identified through systematic review and interviews, we were unable to identify levels for two attributes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified attributes and attribute levels for the treatment of SAPS. There was a discrepancy in the frequency of the represented attributes between the literature and interviews. This study may improve the understanding of patient preferences for the treatment of SAPS and help individualize care. Our study informs a future discrete choice experiment and supports shared decision-making in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), the most common cause of shoulder pain, can be treated through different treatments with similar effects. Therefore, in terms of deciding on the right treatment fit, patient preferences need to be understood. We aimed to identify treatment characteristics that delineate interventions (attributes) and corresponding sets of specific categorical range (attribute-levels) for SAPS.

Methods: This multiple method study systematically reviewed both qualitative and quantitative studies on patient preferences for treatment of SAPS, which informed semi-structured interviews with nine clinicians and 14 patients. The qualitative data from the interviews was analyzed using the framework analysis formulated by Ritchie and Spencer. Attributes and attribute levels of the systematic review and interviews were summarized and categorized.

Results: The search resulted in 2.607 studies, 16 of which met the eligibility criteria. The review identified 120 potential attributes, which were synthesized into 25 potential attributes. Fourteen new potential attributes were identified through the interviews, equaling a total of 39 attributes across 11 categories. Levels for 37 attributes were identified through systematic review and interviews, we were unable to identify levels for two attributes.

Conclusions: This study identified attributes and attribute levels for the treatment of SAPS. There was a discrepancy in the frequency of the represented attributes between the literature and interviews. This study may improve the understanding of patient preferences for the treatment of SAPS and help individualize care. Our study informs a future discrete choice experiment and supports shared decision-making in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发肩峰下疼痛综合征的属性和属性等级:系统回顾与定性研究。
背景:肩峰下疼痛综合征(SAPS)是肩部疼痛最常见的原因,可通过效果相似的不同治疗方法进行治疗。因此,在决定合适的治疗方法时,需要了解患者的偏好。我们的目标是确定治疗特征,这些特征划分了 SAPS 的干预措施(属性)和相应的特定分类范围(属性级别):本研究采用多种方法,系统回顾了有关 SAPS 患者治疗偏好的定性和定量研究,并对 9 名临床医生和 14 名患者进行了半结构式访谈。采用里奇和斯宾塞制定的框架分析法对访谈中的定性数据进行了分析。对系统综述和访谈的属性和属性等级进行了总结和分类:搜索结果显示有 2607 项研究,其中 16 项符合资格标准。审查确定了 120 个潜在属性,并将其归纳为 25 个潜在属性。通过访谈确定了 14 个新的潜在属性,即 11 个类别共 39 个属性。通过系统审查和访谈,确定了 37 个属性的等级,但我们无法确定两个属性的等级:本研究确定了治疗 SAPS 的属性和属性等级。结论:本研究确定了治疗 SAPS 的属性和属性等级,但文献和访谈中代表的属性频率存在差异。本研究可加深对 SAPS 患者治疗偏好的了解,有助于实现个性化护理。我们的研究为未来的离散选择实验提供了信息,并支持临床实践中的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Case-Based Peer Teaching for Pain Medicine Fellows: A Curriculum for Diverse Residency Backgrounds Exploring new educational approaches in neuropathic pain: Assessing accuracy and consistency of AI responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Assessment of chronic pain and its association with functional capacity in patients with HTLV-1. Examination of a repaired medial meniscus: ultrasound's forte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1