Neighborhood Racialized Economic Polarization, Home Visiting Coverage, and Adverse Birth Outcomes in a Medicaid-eligible Population

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.05.001
{"title":"Neighborhood Racialized Economic Polarization, Home Visiting Coverage, and Adverse Birth Outcomes in a Medicaid-eligible Population","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Residential polarization shaped by racial segregation and concentrations of wealth (hereafter neighborhood racialized economic polarization) results in both highly deprived and highly privileged neighborhoods. Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between neighborhood racialized economic polarization and birth outcomes. We investigated whether community-informed home visiting programs achieve high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods and can attenuate the deleterious effect of neighborhood polarization on birth outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 2016–2019 data from Michigan's statewide database that links birth records, Medicaid claims, and program participation (<em>N</em><span><span> = 211,412). We evaluated whether 1) home visiting programs achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods, 2) participation in home visiting may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and 3) the reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight were larger among Black </span>birthing individuals. Data were examined using multilevel generalized linear models and mediation analysis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The statewide home visiting program achieved higher rates of coverage in the most deprived neighborhoods (21.0% statewide, 28.3% in the most deprived vs. 10.4% in the most privileged neighborhoods). For all, home visiting participation was associated with a decrease in the relationship between neighborhood polarization and preterm birth by 6.8% (mean indirect effect, −0.008; 95% confidence interval, −0.011 to −0.005), and by 5.2% (mean indirect effect, −0.013; 95% confidence interval, −0.017 to −0.009) for low birthweight, adjusting for individual-level risk factors. The decrease was larger among Black individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A statewide Medicaid-sponsored home visiting program achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods. Program participation may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and more so among Black individuals. Continued support for home visiting services is required to better engage birthing individuals in neighborhoods with concentrated deprivation and to decrease disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Residential polarization shaped by racial segregation and concentrations of wealth (hereafter neighborhood racialized economic polarization) results in both highly deprived and highly privileged neighborhoods. Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between neighborhood racialized economic polarization and birth outcomes. We investigated whether community-informed home visiting programs achieve high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods and can attenuate the deleterious effect of neighborhood polarization on birth outcomes.

Methods

We used 2016–2019 data from Michigan's statewide database that links birth records, Medicaid claims, and program participation (N = 211,412). We evaluated whether 1) home visiting programs achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods, 2) participation in home visiting may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and 3) the reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight were larger among Black birthing individuals. Data were examined using multilevel generalized linear models and mediation analysis.

Results

The statewide home visiting program achieved higher rates of coverage in the most deprived neighborhoods (21.0% statewide, 28.3% in the most deprived vs. 10.4% in the most privileged neighborhoods). For all, home visiting participation was associated with a decrease in the relationship between neighborhood polarization and preterm birth by 6.8% (mean indirect effect, −0.008; 95% confidence interval, −0.011 to −0.005), and by 5.2% (mean indirect effect, −0.013; 95% confidence interval, −0.017 to −0.009) for low birthweight, adjusting for individual-level risk factors. The decrease was larger among Black individuals.

Conclusions

A statewide Medicaid-sponsored home visiting program achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods. Program participation may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and more so among Black individuals. Continued support for home visiting services is required to better engage birthing individuals in neighborhoods with concentrated deprivation and to decrease disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
符合医疗补助资格人群中的邻里种族经济两极分化、家访覆盖率和不良生育结果》(Nighborhood Racialized Economic Polarization, Home Visiting Coverage, and Adverse Birth Outcomes in a Medicaid-eligible Population)。
背景:种族隔离和财富集中所形成的居住两极化(以下简称 "邻里种族化经济两极化")导致了高度贫困的邻里和高度优越的邻里。大量研究发现,邻里种族经济两极化与出生结果之间存在负相关。我们调查了社区知情家访项目是否能在高度贫困社区实现高服务覆盖率,是否能减轻社区两极分化对出生结果的有害影响:我们使用了密歇根州全州数据库中 2016-2019 年的数据,该数据库将出生记录、医疗补助申请和项目参与(N = 211,412 人)联系在一起。我们评估了:1)家访项目是否在高度贫困的社区实现了高服务覆盖率;2)参与家访是否有助于缓解社区两极分化与出生结果之间的负面关系;3)早产和低出生体重在黑人产妇中的降低幅度是否更大。我们使用多层次广义线性模型和中介分析对数据进行了研究:结果:全州家访计划在最贫困社区的覆盖率更高(全州为 21.0%,最贫困社区为 28.3%,最富裕社区为 10.4%)。就所有人而言,参与家访与邻里两极化和早产之间的关系降低了 6.8%(平均间接效应,-0.008;95% 置信区间,-0.011 至 -0.005),与低出生体重之间的关系降低了 5.2%(平均间接效应,-0.013;95% 置信区间,-0.017 至 -0.009),调整了个人层面的风险因素。黑人的降幅更大:一项由全州医疗补助计划资助的家访项目在高度贫困社区的服务覆盖率很高。该计划的参与可能有助于缓解邻里两极分化与出生结果之间的负面关系,对黑人的影响更大。需要继续支持家访服务,以更好地让贫困集中社区的分娩者参与进来,并减少差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Experience of Pain and Pain Management for Pregnant and Postpartum Veterans With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Hair and Health Among African American Women: Historical and Sociocultural Considerations for Physical Activity and Mental Health. Contents Editorial Board Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1