Best Practice Recommendations for Integrating Health Equity into Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Dementia Care.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ethnicity & Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-10 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18865/ed.33.2-3.084
Susan Mitchell, Ellen McCarthy, Ladson Hinton, Manka Nkimbeng, Katherine D Peak, Ana R Quiñones
{"title":"Best Practice Recommendations for Integrating Health Equity into Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Dementia Care.","authors":"Susan Mitchell, Ellen McCarthy, Ladson Hinton, Manka Nkimbeng, Katherine D Peak, Ana R Quiñones","doi":"10.18865/ed.33.2-3.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Minoritized populations experience higher rates of dementia and worse health outcomes than non-Hispanic white people, but they are vastly underrepresented in pragmatic clinical trials embedded in health care systems (ePCTs). Little guidance is available to consider health equity-relevant issues in ePCTs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes the development, structure, and content of a guidance document developed by the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic AD/ADRD Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory to help investigators systematically assess the integration of health equity into all aspects of ePCT design.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Led by a task force of IMPACT investigators, a literature review of existing frameworks for health equity considerations in clinical trials was conducted. Next, priority health equity-relevant recommendations in the domains of ePCT design were solicited from Collaboratory experts. The 50 submitted recommendations were reduced to 36 nonoverlapping best practices and categorized into 6 domains, as follows: Getting Started, Community Stakeholder Engagement, Design and Analysis, Intervention Design and Implementation, Health Care System and Participant Selection, and Selecting Outcomes. Each domain had 6 best practice recommendations consisting of a succinctly worded main sentence, with 1 to 2 explanatory sentences. The content was finalized through an iterative process of editing and revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although specifically focused on ePCTs involving dementia care, the best practices are applicable to any ePCT and can be useful to advance health equity in traditional clinical trials. This guidance document provides a first step toward promoting holistic, structured integration of health equity into the design and conduct of ePCTs as a matter of good science.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.33.2-3.084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Minoritized populations experience higher rates of dementia and worse health outcomes than non-Hispanic white people, but they are vastly underrepresented in pragmatic clinical trials embedded in health care systems (ePCTs). Little guidance is available to consider health equity-relevant issues in ePCTs.

Objective: This report describes the development, structure, and content of a guidance document developed by the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic AD/ADRD Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory to help investigators systematically assess the integration of health equity into all aspects of ePCT design.

Design: Led by a task force of IMPACT investigators, a literature review of existing frameworks for health equity considerations in clinical trials was conducted. Next, priority health equity-relevant recommendations in the domains of ePCT design were solicited from Collaboratory experts. The 50 submitted recommendations were reduced to 36 nonoverlapping best practices and categorized into 6 domains, as follows: Getting Started, Community Stakeholder Engagement, Design and Analysis, Intervention Design and Implementation, Health Care System and Participant Selection, and Selecting Outcomes. Each domain had 6 best practice recommendations consisting of a succinctly worded main sentence, with 1 to 2 explanatory sentences. The content was finalized through an iterative process of editing and revision.

Conclusions: Although specifically focused on ePCTs involving dementia care, the best practices are applicable to any ePCT and can be useful to advance health equity in traditional clinical trials. This guidance document provides a first step toward promoting holistic, structured integration of health equity into the design and conduct of ePCTs as a matter of good science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将健康公平纳入痴呆症护理务实临床试验的最佳实践建议》。
背景:与非西班牙裔白人相比,少数族裔人群的痴呆症发病率更高,健康状况更差,但他们在嵌入医疗保健系统的实用临床试验(ePCTs)中的代表性却远远不够。在ePCT中考虑健康公平相关问题的指南很少:本报告介绍了美国国立老龄化研究所(National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic AD/ADRD Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory)制定的指导文件的开发、结构和内容,以帮助研究者系统地评估将健康公平纳入 ePCT 设计的各个方面:设计:在 IMPACT 研究人员工作组的领导下,对临床试验中健康公平考虑因素的现有框架进行了文献综述。随后,向合作专家征集了 ePCT 设计领域中与健康公平相关的优先建议。提交的 50 项建议被缩减为 36 项不重叠的最佳实践,并分为以下 6 个领域:入门、社区利益相关者参与、设计与分析、干预设计与实施、医疗保健系统与参与者选择以及结果选择。每个领域都有 6 项最佳实践建议,包括一个措辞简洁的主句和 1 至 2 个解释性句子。通过反复编辑和修改,最终确定了内容:尽管这些最佳实践特别关注涉及痴呆症护理的电子临床试验,但它们适用于任何电子临床试验,并有助于在传统临床试验中促进健康公平。本指导文件为促进将健康公平全面、有序地纳入 ePCT 的设计和实施提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
期刊最新文献
Multilevel Determinants of Long COVID and Potential for Telehealth Intervention. Physical Activity Engagement among Black Immigrants and African American Adults in the 2010 to 2018 NHIS Study. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emotional Reactions to the Flint Water Crisis among Michigan Women in Communities Outside of Flint. Social Vulnerability May Underlie Racial Disparities in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Outcomes. Youth Perspectives on the Flint Water Crisis and Its Health Effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1