Approach bias in individuals with Internet gaming disorder: Evidence from an event-related potential-based approach-avoid task

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES International Journal of Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112376
Cuijing Li , Ting Pan , Jinbo He , Yang Zheng , Liyan Fan , Yayun Meng
{"title":"Approach bias in individuals with Internet gaming disorder: Evidence from an event-related potential-based approach-avoid task","authors":"Cuijing Li ,&nbsp;Ting Pan ,&nbsp;Jinbo He ,&nbsp;Yang Zheng ,&nbsp;Liyan Fan ,&nbsp;Yayun Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) often exhibit an approach bias towards gaming cues compared to non-gaming cues. Although previous studies suggested a positive correlation between approach bias and the severity of game use, the neuropsychological mechanisms that underpin the automatic action tendencies remain largely unexplored. The present study measured event-related potentials (ERPs) in 22 IGD and 23 healthy control (HC) participants who met the inclusion criteria, both groups conducted the Stimulus-Response Compatibility task (SRC), with their ERPs recorded during the task. Results revealed that the IGD group showed a significantly larger approach bias towards gaming cues (avoidance versus approach reaction time) compared to the HC group. The amplitude of P300 significantly increased, whereas N100 significantly decreased for game-approach compared to game-avoid for IGD compared to HC participants. The findings suggested that the enhanced integrated motivational value under compatible conditions as well as increased stimulus-response conflicts under incompatible conditions may contribute to the approach bias in IGD individuals. Further investigation on the intervention is prompted through longitudinal studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 112376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) often exhibit an approach bias towards gaming cues compared to non-gaming cues. Although previous studies suggested a positive correlation between approach bias and the severity of game use, the neuropsychological mechanisms that underpin the automatic action tendencies remain largely unexplored. The present study measured event-related potentials (ERPs) in 22 IGD and 23 healthy control (HC) participants who met the inclusion criteria, both groups conducted the Stimulus-Response Compatibility task (SRC), with their ERPs recorded during the task. Results revealed that the IGD group showed a significantly larger approach bias towards gaming cues (avoidance versus approach reaction time) compared to the HC group. The amplitude of P300 significantly increased, whereas N100 significantly decreased for game-approach compared to game-avoid for IGD compared to HC participants. The findings suggested that the enhanced integrated motivational value under compatible conditions as well as increased stimulus-response conflicts under incompatible conditions may contribute to the approach bias in IGD individuals. Further investigation on the intervention is prompted through longitudinal studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络游戏障碍患者的接近偏差:基于事件相关电位的接近-回避任务提供的证据。
与非游戏线索相比,网络游戏障碍(IGD)患者经常表现出对游戏线索的接近偏差。尽管之前的研究表明,接近偏向与游戏使用的严重程度呈正相关,但支撑这种自动行动倾向的神经心理学机制在很大程度上仍未得到探讨。本研究测量了符合纳入标准的 22 名 IGD 参与者和 23 名健康对照组(HC)参与者的事件相关电位(ERPs),两组参与者都进行了刺激-反应相容性任务(SRC),并在任务过程中记录了他们的 ERPs。结果显示,与健康对照组相比,IGD 组对游戏线索表现出明显的接近偏差(回避与接近反应时间)。与 HC 组相比,IGD 组的 P300 波幅明显增加,而 N100 波幅在游戏接近与游戏回避时明显减少。研究结果表明,相容条件下综合动机价值的增强以及不相容条件下刺激-反应冲突的增加可能会导致 IGD 患者的接近偏差。需要通过纵向研究对干预措施进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness mediates the association between trait social anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress. The relationship between behavioral inhibition and resting electroencephalography: A neuroelectrophysiological study. The impact of reducing cognitive load in RT and P300 concealed information tests with importance related fillers. Perceptual fluency affects recognition memory under deep encoding conditions promoting recollection: Evidence from an ERP study using letter-segregated method. Blunted neural response to real-life social reward anticipation in internet gaming disorder: An event-related potential study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1