[Effectiveness of the CNIC polypill in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the subgroup of patients of the NEPTUNO study using atorvastatin doses of 20 mg].

José R González-Juanatey, Alberto Cordero, Luis Masana, Regina Dalmau
{"title":"[Effectiveness of the CNIC polypill in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the subgroup of patients of the NEPTUNO study using atorvastatin doses of 20 mg].","authors":"José R González-Juanatey, Alberto Cordero, Luis Masana, Regina Dalmau","doi":"10.24875/ACM.23000230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the incidence and risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), level of risk factor control, treatment persistence and cost of the CNIC polypill version containing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg (A20), and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg in secondary cardiovascular prevention patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subanalysis of the observational, retrospective, multicentre, NEPTUNO study in patients treated for two years with the CNIC polypill A20, the same monocomponents as single drugs, equipotent drugs, and other therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>922 patients were included in each group. The risk of recurrent MACE was lower among CNIC A20 polypill users than all others (21%, 23% and 26% increased risk among the monocomponents, equipotent or other therapy cohorts, respectively; p < 0.05). The magnitude of the mean change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure, as well as the increase in the proportion of patients achieving target goals, was also greater among patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill than in any of the other cohorts (all p < 0.001). Treatment persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill (p < 0.001) and was a less costly strategy than any other therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients in secondary cardiovascular prevention, the CNIC A20 polypill (ASA 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg) constitutes a valid therapeutic option with similar benefits and outcomes to the version of the polypill with atorvastatin 40 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":" ","pages":"429-443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.23000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the incidence and risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), level of risk factor control, treatment persistence and cost of the CNIC polypill version containing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg (A20), and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg in secondary cardiovascular prevention patients.

Method: Subanalysis of the observational, retrospective, multicentre, NEPTUNO study in patients treated for two years with the CNIC polypill A20, the same monocomponents as single drugs, equipotent drugs, and other therapies.

Results: 922 patients were included in each group. The risk of recurrent MACE was lower among CNIC A20 polypill users than all others (21%, 23% and 26% increased risk among the monocomponents, equipotent or other therapy cohorts, respectively; p < 0.05). The magnitude of the mean change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure, as well as the increase in the proportion of patients achieving target goals, was also greater among patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill than in any of the other cohorts (all p < 0.001). Treatment persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill (p < 0.001) and was a less costly strategy than any other therapeutic option.

Conclusions: In patients in secondary cardiovascular prevention, the CNIC A20 polypill (ASA 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg) constitutes a valid therapeutic option with similar benefits and outcomes to the version of the polypill with atorvastatin 40 mg.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在使用阿托伐他汀剂量为 20 毫克的 NEPTUNO 研究亚组患者中,CNIC 多效丸对心血管二级预防的有效性]。
目的分析心血管二级预防患者服用含乙酰水杨酸(ASA)100 毫克、阿托伐他汀 20 毫克(A20)和雷米普利 2.5、5.0 或 10 毫克的 CNIC 多效丸的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)复发率和风险、风险因素控制水平、治疗持续性和成本:方法:对观察性、回顾性、多中心的 NEPTUNO 研究进行子分析,研究对象为接受 CNIC 多效丸 A20、相同的单一成分药物、等效药物和其他疗法治疗两年的患者:每组共纳入 922 名患者。CNIC A20多丸剂使用者的复发性MACE风险低于其他所有使用者(单药、等效药或其他疗法组的风险分别增加21%、23%和26%;P < 0.05)。使用 CNIC A20 多效丸治疗的患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和血压的平均变化幅度以及达到目标的患者比例的增加幅度也高于任何其他组别(均 p <0.001)。接受CNIC A20多导丸治疗的患者的治疗持续率明显更高(P<0.001),与其他治疗方案相比,这种策略的成本更低:结论:在心血管二级预防患者中,CNIC A20 多联疗法(ASA 100 毫克、阿托伐他汀 20 毫克和雷米普利 2.5、5.0 或 10 毫克)是一种有效的治疗方案,其疗效和结果与阿托伐他汀 40 毫克多联疗法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in general wards and intensive care units: Insights from the RIMAC cardiopulmonary imaging registry across Latin American centers. Comment on the firsts insights of the arterial hypertension study in México (RIHTA): are we doing things right? Instituto y no hospital. La distintiva organización que Ignacio Chávez concibió para combatir integralmente a las enfermedades del corazón en México. En el octogésimo aniversario del Instituto Nacional de Cardiología. [Right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. About three patients without coronary ostium atresia. Is a transient percutaneous decompression maneuver necessary?] [Clinical characterization of patients with complete fetal atrioventricular block].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1