Applying a Conceptual Framework to Maximize the Participation of Diverse Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Advances in cancer research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-10-05 DOI:10.1016/bs.acr.2016.08.004
A Napoles, E Cook, T Ginossar, K D Knight, M E Ford
{"title":"Applying a Conceptual Framework to Maximize the Participation of Diverse Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials.","authors":"A Napoles, E Cook, T Ginossar, K D Knight, M E Ford","doi":"10.1016/bs.acr.2016.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The underrepresentation of ethnically diverse populations in cancer clinical trials results in the inequitable distribution of the risks and benefits of this research. Using a case study approach, we apply a conceptual framework of factors associated with the participation of diverse population groups in cancer clinical trials developed by Dr. Jean Ford and colleagues to increase understanding of the specific strategies, and barriers and promoters addressed by these strategies, that resulted in marked success in accrual of racially and ethnically diverse populations in cancer clinical research. Results indicate that the studies presented were able to successfully engage minority participants due to the creation and implementation of multilevel, multifaceted strategies that included: culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach, education, and research studies that were accessible in local communities; infrastructure to support engagement of key stakeholders, clinicians, and organizations serving minority communities; testimonials by ethnically diverse cancer survivors; availability of medical interpretation services; and providing infrastructure that facilitated the engagement in clinical research of clinicians who care for minority patient populations. These strategic efforts were effective in addressing limited awareness of trials, lack of opportunities to participate, and acceptance of engagement in cancer clinical trials. Careful attention to the context and population characteristics in which cancer clinical trials are conducted will be necessary to address disparities in research participation and cancer outcomes. These studies illustrate that progress on minority accrual into clinical research requires intentional efforts to overcome barriers at all three stages of the accrual process: awareness, opportunity, and acceptance of participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94294,"journal":{"name":"Advances in cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acr.2016.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The underrepresentation of ethnically diverse populations in cancer clinical trials results in the inequitable distribution of the risks and benefits of this research. Using a case study approach, we apply a conceptual framework of factors associated with the participation of diverse population groups in cancer clinical trials developed by Dr. Jean Ford and colleagues to increase understanding of the specific strategies, and barriers and promoters addressed by these strategies, that resulted in marked success in accrual of racially and ethnically diverse populations in cancer clinical research. Results indicate that the studies presented were able to successfully engage minority participants due to the creation and implementation of multilevel, multifaceted strategies that included: culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach, education, and research studies that were accessible in local communities; infrastructure to support engagement of key stakeholders, clinicians, and organizations serving minority communities; testimonials by ethnically diverse cancer survivors; availability of medical interpretation services; and providing infrastructure that facilitated the engagement in clinical research of clinicians who care for minority patient populations. These strategic efforts were effective in addressing limited awareness of trials, lack of opportunities to participate, and acceptance of engagement in cancer clinical trials. Careful attention to the context and population characteristics in which cancer clinical trials are conducted will be necessary to address disparities in research participation and cancer outcomes. These studies illustrate that progress on minority accrual into clinical research requires intentional efforts to overcome barriers at all three stages of the accrual process: awareness, opportunity, and acceptance of participation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用概念框架最大限度地提高不同人群参与癌症临床试验的比例。
不同种族人群在癌症临床试验中的代表性不足,导致这项研究的风险和收益分配不公平。我们采用案例研究的方法,运用让-福特博士及其同事开发的癌症临床试验中不同人群参与相关因素的概念框架,进一步了解具体的策略以及这些策略所解决的障碍和促进因素,从而使癌症临床研究中不同种族和族裔人群的参与取得显著成功。研究结果表明,所介绍的研究之所以能够成功地吸引少数族裔参与者,是因为制定并实施了多层次、多方面的策略,其中包括:在文化和语言上适当的宣传、教育和研究,这些都是当地社区可以接触到的;支持主要利益相关者、临床医生和服务于少数族裔社区的组织参与的基础设施;不同种族癌症幸存者的见证;医疗翻译服务的提供;以及提供基础设施,为照顾少数族裔患者群体的临床医生参与临床研究提供便利。这些战略努力有效地解决了对试验的认识有限、缺乏参与机会以及对参与癌症临床试验的接受程度等问题。要解决研究参与和癌症结果的差异问题,就必须认真关注开展癌症临床试验的背景和人群特征。这些研究表明,要想在少数群体参与临床研究方面取得进展,就必须有意识地努力克服参与过程中所有三个阶段的障碍:认识、机会和接受参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancements in computer vision and pathology: Unraveling the potential of artificial intelligence for precision diagnosis and beyond. Deciphering the genetic and epigenetic architecture of prostate cancer. Epigenetic regulation of androgen dependent and independent prostate cancer. Molecular landscape of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Multiplexed quantitative proteomics in prostate cancer biomarker development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1