Thinking disposition education improves cognitive reflection: Experimental results from an intervention study

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101569
Gabe Avakian Orona, Ulrich Trautwein
{"title":"Thinking disposition education improves cognitive reflection: Experimental results from an intervention study","authors":"Gabe Avakian Orona,&nbsp;Ulrich Trautwein","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive reflection is a construct measuring one's ability to disengage automatic or type I processing and instead activate effortful deliberation, described as type II processing in dual process theories. Successfully overriding intuitive responses is posited to rely on, in part, trait-like attributes known as thinking dispositions, though a causal link has not been established. The present research is the first randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a novel thinking disposition intervention (TDI)—a 7-week educational curriculum—on cognitive reflection performance. In the present study, participants (<em>N</em> = 338) were randomized to either the TDI or a control condition. A Bayesian modeling approach suggests positive and moderate effects. Moreover, those in the treatment were over twice as likely to make CRT gains than those in the control group. Additional mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to test whether the TDI impacts CRT via thinking dispositions such as need for cognition and intellectual humility, and/or whether such attributes meaningfully interact with the intervention. Thinking dispositions do not appear to mediate this relationship, neither do they moderate the effect of the intervention. Implications for dual process theory are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400107X/pdfft?md5=b1439c5fe688d61096310deef82a2300&pid=1-s2.0-S187118712400107X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400107X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive reflection is a construct measuring one's ability to disengage automatic or type I processing and instead activate effortful deliberation, described as type II processing in dual process theories. Successfully overriding intuitive responses is posited to rely on, in part, trait-like attributes known as thinking dispositions, though a causal link has not been established. The present research is the first randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a novel thinking disposition intervention (TDI)—a 7-week educational curriculum—on cognitive reflection performance. In the present study, participants (N = 338) were randomized to either the TDI or a control condition. A Bayesian modeling approach suggests positive and moderate effects. Moreover, those in the treatment were over twice as likely to make CRT gains than those in the control group. Additional mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to test whether the TDI impacts CRT via thinking dispositions such as need for cognition and intellectual humility, and/or whether such attributes meaningfully interact with the intervention. Thinking dispositions do not appear to mediate this relationship, neither do they moderate the effect of the intervention. Implications for dual process theory are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思维处置教育能提高认知反思能力:干预研究的实验结果
认知反思是一种衡量一个人脱离自动或第一类处理过程,转而激活努力斟酌(在双重过程理论中被描述为第二类处理过程)的能力的建构。成功克服直觉反应被认为部分依赖于被称为思维处置的特质属性,但其因果关系尚未确立。本研究是首个随机对照试验,调查了新颖的思维处置干预(TDI)--为期 7 周的教育课程--对认知反思表现的影响。在本研究中,参与者(N = 338)被随机分配到 TDI 或对照组。贝叶斯建模方法显示了积极和适度的效果。此外,与对照组相比,治疗组获得 CRT 提高的可能性是对照组的两倍多。我们还进行了额外的中介和调节分析,以检验 TDI 是否通过思维倾向(如认知需求和智力谦逊)对 CRT 产生影响,以及/或这些属性是否与干预措施产生了有意义的相互作用。结果表明,思维倾向似乎并没有调解这种关系,也没有调节干预的效果。本文讨论了双重过程理论的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
From problem-crumbling to innovation: The design of a comprehensive professional development training programme to enhance creative competence among TEFL educators Educational experiences integrating the arts into teaching practice in primary education in Ecuador Examining the cognitive and affective changes in students through the implementation process of the physics curriculum based on an interdisciplinary context-based learning approach Fostering meta-moral cognitive skills among pre-service teachers using creative problem-solving processes Application of clinical case-guided, task-driven escape room teaching in nursing education: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1