The Janus-Faced Role of Renewable Energy Development in Global Carbon Reduction Under Renewable Energy Policies

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004535
Yang Chen, Jingke Hong, Quan Wen, Wen Yi, Saina Zheng
{"title":"The Janus-Faced Role of Renewable Energy Development in Global Carbon Reduction Under Renewable Energy Policies","authors":"Yang Chen,&nbsp;Jingke Hong,&nbsp;Quan Wen,&nbsp;Wen Yi,&nbsp;Saina Zheng","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global-scale empirical analysis of how renewable energy policies (REPs) affect carbon emissions and the mediating role of renewable energy development (RED) in this mechanism remains underexplored. To fill this research gap, we extracted and organized REPs data from IEA's databases for 135 countries until 2018 and conducted empirical analyses of these issues. We find that: (a) REPs significantly reduce global carbon emissions, especially through regulatory, economic, and R&amp;D policies. (b) REPs' effectiveness in mitigating carbon emissions is enhanced by robust energy infrastructure, strong control of corruption, and adherence to the rule of law. Besides, the balance of REPs types does not influence their efficiency, but REPs prioritizing certain renewable energy (RE) types aligns better with carbon reduction goals. (c) RED displays a Janus-faced influence on REPs' carbon reduction effect—renewable energy consumption (REC) positively mediates it, whereas renewable energy share (RES) exerts a negative mediation. Specifically, REC consistently reduces carbon emissions, while RES initially increases and then decreases carbon emissions, exhibiting an inverted U-shape. (d) The initial rise in carbon emissions with RES is due to the low substitution of RE for fossil energy and the country-specific heterogeneity in organizational, geographic, industrial, economic, demographic, and temporal factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004535","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global-scale empirical analysis of how renewable energy policies (REPs) affect carbon emissions and the mediating role of renewable energy development (RED) in this mechanism remains underexplored. To fill this research gap, we extracted and organized REPs data from IEA's databases for 135 countries until 2018 and conducted empirical analyses of these issues. We find that: (a) REPs significantly reduce global carbon emissions, especially through regulatory, economic, and R&D policies. (b) REPs' effectiveness in mitigating carbon emissions is enhanced by robust energy infrastructure, strong control of corruption, and adherence to the rule of law. Besides, the balance of REPs types does not influence their efficiency, but REPs prioritizing certain renewable energy (RE) types aligns better with carbon reduction goals. (c) RED displays a Janus-faced influence on REPs' carbon reduction effect—renewable energy consumption (REC) positively mediates it, whereas renewable energy share (RES) exerts a negative mediation. Specifically, REC consistently reduces carbon emissions, while RES initially increases and then decreases carbon emissions, exhibiting an inverted U-shape. (d) The initial rise in carbon emissions with RES is due to the low substitution of RE for fossil energy and the country-specific heterogeneity in organizational, geographic, industrial, economic, demographic, and temporal factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源政策下可再生能源发展在全球碳减排中的 "双面夹击 "作用
关于可再生能源政策(REPs)如何影响碳排放以及可再生能源发展(RED)在这一机制中的中介作用的全球范围实证分析仍未得到充分探索。为了填补这一研究空白,我们从国际能源署的数据库中提取并整理了截至 2018 年 135 个国家的可再生能源政策数据,并对这些问题进行了实证分析。我们发现(a) REPs 大幅减少了全球碳排放,尤其是通过监管、经济和研发政策。(b) 健全的能源基础设施、对腐败的有力控制以及对法治的遵守,都会增强 REPs 在减少碳排放方面的有效性。此外,REPs 类型的平衡并不影响其效率,但优先考虑某些可再生能源类型的 REPs 更符合碳减排目标。(c) RED 对 REPs 碳减排效果的影响呈 "金字塔 "形--可再生能源消费(REC)对其起正向调节作用,而可再生能源份额(RES)则起负向调节作用。具体而言,可再生能源消费持续减少碳排放,而可再生能源份额则先增加后减少碳排放,呈现倒 U 型。(d) 可再生能源的碳排放量最初增加是由于可再生能源对化石能源的替代率低,以及各国在组织、地理、工业、经济、人口和时间因素方面的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Projected Increasing Negative Impact of Extreme Events on Gross Primary Productivity During the 21st Century in CMIP6 Models Quantifying Global Wetland Methane Emissions With In Situ Methane Flux Data and Machine Learning Approaches Integrating Values to Improve the Relevance of Climate-Risk Research Blue Carbon Assessment in the Salt Marshes of the Venice Lagoon: Dimensions, Variability and Influence of Storm-Surge Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1