'It was like coming back from the clouds': a qualitative analysis of the lived experience of overdose consequent to drug use among a cohort of people who use drugs in Scotland.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Harm Reduction Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01033-7
Christopher J Byrne, Fabio Sani, Teresa Flynn, Amy Malaguti
{"title":"'It was like coming back from the clouds': a qualitative analysis of the lived experience of overdose consequent to drug use among a cohort of people who use drugs in Scotland.","authors":"Christopher J Byrne, Fabio Sani, Teresa Flynn, Amy Malaguti","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01033-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, non-fatal overdose (NFOD) rates consequent to drug use, typically opioids, continue increasing at a startling rate. Existing quantitative research has revealed myriad factors and characteristics linked to experiencing NFOD, but it is critically important to explore the lived context underlying these associations. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand the experiences of NFOD among people who use drugs in a Scottish region in order to: enhance public policy responses; inform potential intervention development to mitigate risk; and contribute to the literature documenting the lived experience of NFOD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June to July 2021, two peer researchers conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs who had experienced recent NFOD attending harm reduction services in Tayside, Scotland. These were transcribed verbatim and evaluated using thematic analysis with an inductive approach which had an experiential and essentialist orientation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty people were interviewed across two sites. Of those, 15 (75%) were male and mean age was 38.2 (7.7) years. All had experienced at least one NFOD in the prior six months, and all reported polydrug use. Five themes were identified, within which 12 subthemes were situated. The themes were: social context; personal risk-taking triggers; planned and impulsive consumption; risk perception; and overdose reversal. The results spoke to the environmental, behavioural, cognitive, economic, and marketplace, factors which influence the context of NFOD in the region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A complex interplay of behavioural, psychological, and situational factors were found to impact the likelihood of experiencing NFOD. Structural inequities which policy professionals and civic leaders should seek to remedy were identified, while service providers may seek to reconfigure healthcare provision for people who use drugs to account for the interpersonal, psychological, and social factors identified, which appear to precipitate NFOD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01033-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, non-fatal overdose (NFOD) rates consequent to drug use, typically opioids, continue increasing at a startling rate. Existing quantitative research has revealed myriad factors and characteristics linked to experiencing NFOD, but it is critically important to explore the lived context underlying these associations. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand the experiences of NFOD among people who use drugs in a Scottish region in order to: enhance public policy responses; inform potential intervention development to mitigate risk; and contribute to the literature documenting the lived experience of NFOD.

Methods: From June to July 2021, two peer researchers conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs who had experienced recent NFOD attending harm reduction services in Tayside, Scotland. These were transcribed verbatim and evaluated using thematic analysis with an inductive approach which had an experiential and essentialist orientation.

Results: Twenty people were interviewed across two sites. Of those, 15 (75%) were male and mean age was 38.2 (7.7) years. All had experienced at least one NFOD in the prior six months, and all reported polydrug use. Five themes were identified, within which 12 subthemes were situated. The themes were: social context; personal risk-taking triggers; planned and impulsive consumption; risk perception; and overdose reversal. The results spoke to the environmental, behavioural, cognitive, economic, and marketplace, factors which influence the context of NFOD in the region.

Conclusions: A complex interplay of behavioural, psychological, and situational factors were found to impact the likelihood of experiencing NFOD. Structural inequities which policy professionals and civic leaders should seek to remedy were identified, while service providers may seek to reconfigure healthcare provision for people who use drugs to account for the interpersonal, psychological, and social factors identified, which appear to precipitate NFOD.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就像从云端归来":对苏格兰一批吸毒者因吸毒过量而产生的生活经历的定性分析。
背景:在全球范围内,因使用毒品(通常是阿片类药物)而导致的非致命性用药过量(NFOD)率继续以惊人的速度增长。现有的定量研究揭示了与非致命性吸毒过量相关的众多因素和特征,但探索这些关联背后的生活背景至关重要。在这项定性研究中,我们试图了解苏格兰地区吸毒者的 NFOD 经历,以便:加强公共政策应对;为潜在干预措施的开发提供信息以降低风险;为记录 NFOD 生活经历的文献做出贡献:2021 年 6 月至 7 月期间,两名同行研究人员对苏格兰泰赛德地区最近在减低伤害服务机构经历过 NFOD 的吸毒者进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。这些访谈被逐字记录下来,并采用归纳式主题分析法进行评估,归纳式主题分析法以经验和本质论为导向:在两个地点对 20 人进行了访谈。其中 15 人(75%)为男性,平均年龄为 38.2(7.7)岁。所有受访者在之前的六个月中至少经历过一次 NFOD,并且所有受访者都报告了使用多种药物的情况。研究确定了五个主题,其中有 12 个次主题。这些主题是:社会环境;个人冒险诱因;计划性和冲动性消费;风险认知;以及用药过量逆转。研究结果表明,环境、行为、认知、经济和市场等因素影响着该地区的 NFOD:结论:研究发现,行为、心理和情境因素之间的复杂相互作用影响着经历 NFOD 的可能性。结论:研究发现,行为、心理和情境因素之间复杂的相互作用影响着出现 NFOD 的可能性。研究还发现了政策专业人员和民间领袖应努力纠正的结构性不公平现象,而服务提供者则可努力重新配置为吸毒者提供的医疗保健服务,以考虑到已发现的人际、心理和社会因素,这些因素似乎是 NFOD 的诱发因素:试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of different populations accessing online overdose response training and harm reduction supplies (ADORES). How far are we? Assessing progress in hepatitis C response towards the WHO 2030 elimination goals by the civil society monitoring in 25 European countries, period 2020 to 2023. How we understand fully the supply, demand, and harm reduction in drugs policy in Vietnam? Experiences of the changing illicit drug supply among racial and ethnic minoritized people in three US states: a qualitative study. Improving hospital care for people who use drugs: deliberative process development of a clinical guideline for opioid withdrawal management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1