Evaluation of a Regional Tobacco Control Program (Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History) on Quitting and Smoking in England 2014-2022: A Time-Series Analysis.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae145
Sarah E Jackson, Emma Beard, Jamie Brown
{"title":"Evaluation of a Regional Tobacco Control Program (Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History) on Quitting and Smoking in England 2014-2022: A Time-Series Analysis.","authors":"Sarah E Jackson, Emma Beard, Jamie Brown","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History program-a region-wide smoking cessation programs launched in January 2018-on key smoking and quitting outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from a nationally representative monthly survey, 2014-2022 (n = 171 281). We used interrupted time-series analyses (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average [ARIMA] and generalized additive models [GAM]) to examine regional differences between Greater Manchester and the rest of England, before and during the program's first five years. Outcomes were rates of quit attempts and overall quits among smokers, quit success rates among smokers who tried to quit (preregistered outcomes), and current smoking prevalence among adults (unregistered outcome).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed mixed effects of the program on quitting. Primary ARIMA models showed comparative reductions in quit success rates (change in quarterly difference between regions = -11.03%; 95% CI -18.96; -3.11) and overall quit rates in Greater Manchester compared with the rest of England (-2.56%; 95% CI -4.95; -0.18), and no significant change in the difference in the quit attempt rate (+2.95%; 95% CI -11.64; 17.54). These results were not consistently observed across sensitivity analyses or GAM analyses. Exploratory ARIMA models consistently showed smoking prevalence in Greater Manchester declined more quickly than in the rest of England following the initiation of the program (-2.14%; 95% CI -4.02; -0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The first five years of Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History program did not appear to be associated with substantial increases in quitting activity. However, exploratory analyses showed a significant reduction in the regional smoking rate, over and above changes in the rest of England over the same period.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Taken together, these results show a relative decline in smoking prevalence in Greater Manchester but equivocal data on quitting, introducing some uncertainty. It is possible the program has reduced smoking prevalence in the absence of any substantial change in quitting activity by changing norms around smoking and reducing uptake, or by reducing the rate of late relapse. It is also possible that an undetected effect on quitting outcomes has still contributed to the program's impact on reducing prevalence to some degree. It will be important to evaluate the overall impact of the program over a longer timeframe.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1728-1736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the impact of Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History program-a region-wide smoking cessation programs launched in January 2018-on key smoking and quitting outcomes.

Methods: Data were from a nationally representative monthly survey, 2014-2022 (n = 171 281). We used interrupted time-series analyses (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average [ARIMA] and generalized additive models [GAM]) to examine regional differences between Greater Manchester and the rest of England, before and during the program's first five years. Outcomes were rates of quit attempts and overall quits among smokers, quit success rates among smokers who tried to quit (preregistered outcomes), and current smoking prevalence among adults (unregistered outcome).

Results: Results showed mixed effects of the program on quitting. Primary ARIMA models showed comparative reductions in quit success rates (change in quarterly difference between regions = -11.03%; 95% CI -18.96; -3.11) and overall quit rates in Greater Manchester compared with the rest of England (-2.56%; 95% CI -4.95; -0.18), and no significant change in the difference in the quit attempt rate (+2.95%; 95% CI -11.64; 17.54). These results were not consistently observed across sensitivity analyses or GAM analyses. Exploratory ARIMA models consistently showed smoking prevalence in Greater Manchester declined more quickly than in the rest of England following the initiation of the program (-2.14%; 95% CI -4.02; -0.27).

Conclusions: The first five years of Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History program did not appear to be associated with substantial increases in quitting activity. However, exploratory analyses showed a significant reduction in the regional smoking rate, over and above changes in the rest of England over the same period.

Implications: Taken together, these results show a relative decline in smoking prevalence in Greater Manchester but equivocal data on quitting, introducing some uncertainty. It is possible the program has reduced smoking prevalence in the absence of any substantial change in quitting activity by changing norms around smoking and reducing uptake, or by reducing the rate of late relapse. It is also possible that an undetected effect on quitting outcomes has still contributed to the program's impact on reducing prevalence to some degree. It will be important to evaluate the overall impact of the program over a longer timeframe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区烟草控制计划(大曼彻斯特 "让吸烟成为历史")对英格兰 2014 年至 2022 年戒烟和吸烟情况的评估:时间序列分析。
简介:本研究旨在评估大曼彻斯特 "让吸烟成为历史 "计划(2018 年 1 月启动的全地区戒烟计划)对主要吸烟和戒烟结果的影响:本研究旨在评估大曼彻斯特 "让吸烟成为历史 "计划(一项于2018年1月启动的全地区戒烟计划)对主要吸烟和戒烟结果的影响:数据来自2014-2022年具有全国代表性的月度调查(n=171,281)。我们使用间断时间序列分析(自回归综合移动平均法 [ARIMA] 和广义加法模型 [GAM])来研究大曼彻斯特地区和英格兰其他地区在该计划实施前五年和实施期间的地区差异。研究结果包括吸烟者的尝试戒烟率和总体戒烟率、尝试戒烟者的成功戒烟率(登记前结果)以及当前成年人的吸烟率(未登记结果):结果显示,该计划对戒烟的效果好坏参半。主要的ARIMA模型显示,与英格兰其他地区相比,大曼彻斯特地区的戒烟成功率(地区间季度差异的变化=-11.03%;95%CI -18.96;-3.11)和总体戒烟率(-2.56%;95%CI -4.95;-0.18)有比较大的下降,而尝试戒烟率的差异没有显著变化(+2.95%;95%CI -11.64;17.54)。这些结果在敏感性分析或 GAM 分析中均未观察到。探索性ARIMA模型一致显示,在该计划启动后,大曼彻斯特地区吸烟率的下降速度比英格兰其他地区更快(-2.14%;95%CI -4.02;-0.27):结论:大曼彻斯特地区 "让吸烟成为历史 "项目的前五年似乎与戒烟活动的大幅增加无关。然而,探索性分析显示,该地区的吸烟率显著下降,超过了同期英格兰其他地区的变化:综合来看,这些结果表明大曼彻斯特地区的吸烟率相对下降,但戒烟数据不明确,带来了一些不确定性。在戒烟活动没有发生实质性变化的情况下,该计划有可能通过改变吸烟规范、减少吸烟率或降低后期复吸率而降低了吸烟率。也有可能是未被发现的对戒烟结果的影响在一定程度上促进了该计划对降低吸烟率的影响。在更长的时间范围内评估该计划的总体影响将是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Diversity and Impacting Factors of Smoke-Free Legislation and Implementation in Mainland China: A Case Qualitative Research. Structural stigma and inequities in tobacco use among sexual and gender minoritized people: Accounting for context and intersectionality. Tobacco industry-backed third parties sow confusion and doubt amongst the public health community. AI for Tobacco Control: Identifying Tobacco-promoting Social Media Content Using Large Language Models. Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1