Using 42 CFR part 2 revisions to integrate substance use disorder treatment information into electronic health records at a safety net health system.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00477-3
Alexandra R Tillman, Emily Bacon, Brooke Bender, Dean McEwen, Joshua Blum, Matthew Hoag, Kenneth A Scott, Rachel Everhart, Rebecca Hanratty, Laura J Podewils, Carolina Close, John Mills, Arthur J Davidson
{"title":"Using 42 CFR part 2 revisions to integrate substance use disorder treatment information into electronic health records at a safety net health system.","authors":"Alexandra R Tillman, Emily Bacon, Brooke Bender, Dean McEwen, Joshua Blum, Matthew Hoag, Kenneth A Scott, Rachel Everhart, Rebecca Hanratty, Laura J Podewils, Carolina Close, John Mills, Arthur J Davidson","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00477-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regulations put in place to protect the privacy of individuals receiving substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have resulted in an unintended consequence of siloed SUD treatment and referral information outside of the integrated electronic health record (EHR). Recent revisions to these regulations have opened the door to data integration, which creates opportunities for enhanced patient care and more efficient workflows. We report on the experience of one safety-net hospital system integrating SUD treatment data into the EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SUD treatment and referral information was integrated from siloed systems into the EHR through the implementation of a referral order, treatment episode definition, and referral and episode-related tools for addiction therapists and other clinicians. Integration was evaluated by monitoring SUD treatment episode characteristics, patient characteristics, referral linkage, and treatment episode retention before and after integration. Satisfaction of end-users with the new tools was evaluated through a survey of addiction therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After integration, three more SUD treatment programs were represented in the EHR. This increased the number of patients that could be tracked as initiating SUD treatment by 250%, from 562 before to 1,411 after integration. After integration, overall referral linkage declined (74% vs. 48%) and treatment episode retention at 90-days was higher (45% vs. 74%). Addiction therapists appreciated the efficiency of having all SUD treatment information in the EHR but did not find that the tools provided a large time savings shortly after integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration of SUD treatment program data into the EHR facilitated both care coordination in patient treatment and quality improvement initiatives for treatment programs. Referral linkage and retention rates were likely modified by a broader capture of patients and changed outcome definition criteria. Greater preparatory workflow analysis may decrease initial end-user burden. Integration of siloed data, made possible given revised regulations, is essential to an efficient hub-and-spoke model of care, which must standardize and coordinate patient care across multiple clinics and departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00477-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regulations put in place to protect the privacy of individuals receiving substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have resulted in an unintended consequence of siloed SUD treatment and referral information outside of the integrated electronic health record (EHR). Recent revisions to these regulations have opened the door to data integration, which creates opportunities for enhanced patient care and more efficient workflows. We report on the experience of one safety-net hospital system integrating SUD treatment data into the EHR.

Methods: SUD treatment and referral information was integrated from siloed systems into the EHR through the implementation of a referral order, treatment episode definition, and referral and episode-related tools for addiction therapists and other clinicians. Integration was evaluated by monitoring SUD treatment episode characteristics, patient characteristics, referral linkage, and treatment episode retention before and after integration. Satisfaction of end-users with the new tools was evaluated through a survey of addiction therapists.

Results: After integration, three more SUD treatment programs were represented in the EHR. This increased the number of patients that could be tracked as initiating SUD treatment by 250%, from 562 before to 1,411 after integration. After integration, overall referral linkage declined (74% vs. 48%) and treatment episode retention at 90-days was higher (45% vs. 74%). Addiction therapists appreciated the efficiency of having all SUD treatment information in the EHR but did not find that the tools provided a large time savings shortly after integration.

Conclusions: Integration of SUD treatment program data into the EHR facilitated both care coordination in patient treatment and quality improvement initiatives for treatment programs. Referral linkage and retention rates were likely modified by a broader capture of patients and changed outcome definition criteria. Greater preparatory workflow analysis may decrease initial end-user burden. Integration of siloed data, made possible given revised regulations, is essential to an efficient hub-and-spoke model of care, which must standardize and coordinate patient care across multiple clinics and departments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 42 CFR 第 2 部分的修订,将药物使用障碍治疗信息整合到安全网医疗系统的电子病历中。
背景:为保护接受药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗的个人隐私而制定的法规造成了一个意想不到的后果,即在集成电子健康记录(EHR)之外,SUD 治疗和转诊信息被孤立起来。最近对这些法规的修订为数据整合打开了大门,这为加强患者护理和提高工作流程效率创造了机会。我们报告了一家安全网医院系统将 SUD 治疗数据整合到电子病历中的经验:方法:通过为成瘾治疗师和其他临床医生实施转诊单、治疗情节定义、转诊和情节相关工具,将药物滥用治疗和转诊信息从孤立的系统整合到电子病历中。通过监测整合前后的 SUD 治疗事件特征、患者特征、转诊链接和治疗事件保留情况,对整合情况进行了评估。通过对成瘾治疗师进行调查,评估最终用户对新工具的满意度:结果:整合后,电子病历中增加了三个药物滥用治疗项目。整合后,电子病历中增加了三个药物滥用治疗项目,可追踪到的开始药物滥用治疗的患者人数增加了 250%,从整合前的 562 人增加到整合后的 1 411 人。整合后,总体转诊联系率下降(74% 对 48%),90 天的治疗保留率提高(45% 对 74%)。成瘾治疗师对电子病历中所有 SUD 治疗信息的效率表示赞赏,但在整合后不久,他们并没有发现这些工具节省了大量时间:结论:将药物滥用治疗计划数据整合到电子病历中既有利于患者治疗中的护理协调,也有利于治疗计划的质量改进措施。转诊联系率和保留率可能会因为更广泛的患者范围和结果定义标准的改变而有所改变。更多的准备工作流程分析可能会减轻最终用户的初始负担。修订后的法规使整合孤立的数据成为可能,这对高效的中心辐射式医疗模式至关重要,因为这种模式必须在多个诊所和部门之间实现标准化并协调患者治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Patient centered medication treatment for opioid use disorder in rural Vermont: a qualitative study. Substance use recovery needs among college students seeking recovery services: a thematic qualitative analysis. Buprenorphine and postpartum contraception utilization among people with opioid use disorder: a multi-state analysis. Perceptions of family physicians in Istanbul about e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids: a qualitative study. Associations of the Korean patient placement criteria matching among individuals with alcohol-related problems with treatment completion and abstinence: an observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1