How context links to best practice use in long-term care homes: a mixed methods study.

Yinfei Duan, Jing Wang, Holly J Lanham, Whitney Berta, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Matthias Hoben, Katharina Choroschun, Alba Iaconi, Yuting Song, Janelle Santos Perez, Shovana Shrestha, Anna Beeber, Ruth A Anderson, Leslie Hayduk, Greta G Cummings, Peter G Norton, Carole A Estabrooks
{"title":"How context links to best practice use in long-term care homes: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Yinfei Duan, Jing Wang, Holly J Lanham, Whitney Berta, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Matthias Hoben, Katharina Choroschun, Alba Iaconi, Yuting Song, Janelle Santos Perez, Shovana Shrestha, Anna Beeber, Ruth A Anderson, Leslie Hayduk, Greta G Cummings, Peter G Norton, Carole A Estabrooks","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00600-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Context (work environment) plays a crucial role in implementing evidence-based best practices within health care settings. Context is multi-faceted and its complex relationship with best practice use by care aides in long-term care (LTC) homes are understudied. This study used an innovative approach to investigate how context elements interrelate and influence best practice use by LTC care aides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis study, we combined coincidence analysis (a configurational comparative method) and qualitative analysis to examine data collected through the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program. Coincidence analysis of clinical microsystem (care unit)-level data aggregated from a survey of 1,506 care aides across 36 Canadian LTC homes identified configurations (paths) of context elements linked consistently to care aides' best practices use, measured with a scale of conceptual research use (CRU). Qualitative analysis of ethnographic case study data from 3 LTC homes (co-occurring with the survey) further informed interpretation of the configurations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three paths led to very high CRU at the care unit level: very high leadership; frequent use of educational materials; or a combination of very high social capital (teamwork) and frequent communication between care aides and clinical educators or specialists. Conversely, 2 paths led to very low CRU, consisting of 3 context elements related to unfavorable conditions in relationships, resources, and formal learning opportunities. Our qualitative analysis provided insights into how specific context elements served as facilitators or barriers for best practices. This qualitative exploration was especially helpful in understanding 2 of the paths, illustrating the pivotal role of leadership and the function of teamwork in mitigating the negative impact of time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study deepens understanding of the complex interrelationships between context elements and their impact on the implementation of best practices in LTC homes. The findings underscore that there is no singular, universal bundle of context-related elements that enhance or hinder best practice use in LTC homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00600-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Context (work environment) plays a crucial role in implementing evidence-based best practices within health care settings. Context is multi-faceted and its complex relationship with best practice use by care aides in long-term care (LTC) homes are understudied. This study used an innovative approach to investigate how context elements interrelate and influence best practice use by LTC care aides.

Methods: In this secondary analysis study, we combined coincidence analysis (a configurational comparative method) and qualitative analysis to examine data collected through the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program. Coincidence analysis of clinical microsystem (care unit)-level data aggregated from a survey of 1,506 care aides across 36 Canadian LTC homes identified configurations (paths) of context elements linked consistently to care aides' best practices use, measured with a scale of conceptual research use (CRU). Qualitative analysis of ethnographic case study data from 3 LTC homes (co-occurring with the survey) further informed interpretation of the configurations.

Results: Three paths led to very high CRU at the care unit level: very high leadership; frequent use of educational materials; or a combination of very high social capital (teamwork) and frequent communication between care aides and clinical educators or specialists. Conversely, 2 paths led to very low CRU, consisting of 3 context elements related to unfavorable conditions in relationships, resources, and formal learning opportunities. Our qualitative analysis provided insights into how specific context elements served as facilitators or barriers for best practices. This qualitative exploration was especially helpful in understanding 2 of the paths, illustrating the pivotal role of leadership and the function of teamwork in mitigating the negative impact of time constraints.

Conclusions: Our study deepens understanding of the complex interrelationships between context elements and their impact on the implementation of best practices in LTC homes. The findings underscore that there is no singular, universal bundle of context-related elements that enhance or hinder best practice use in LTC homes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境如何与长期护理院使用最佳实践联系起来:一项混合方法研究。
背景:情境(工作环境)在医疗机构实施循证最佳实践中起着至关重要的作用。情境是多方面的,它与长期护理(LTC)机构中护理助理使用最佳实践的复杂关系尚未得到充分研究。本研究采用了一种创新方法来调查环境因素是如何相互关联并影响长期护理院护理助手使用最佳实践的:在这项二次分析研究中,我们结合了巧合分析(一种配置比较方法)和定性分析,对通过老年护理转化研究(TREC)项目收集到的数据进行了研究。通过对加拿大 36 家 LTC 养老院的 1,506 名护理人员进行调查,对临床微观系统(护理单元)层面的数据进行了巧合分析,确定了与护理人员使用最佳实践相关的环境要素配置(路径),并用概念研究使用(CRU)量表进行了测量。对来自 3 家 LTC 养老院的人种学案例研究数据(与调查同时进行)进行的定性分析,为解释这些配置提供了进一步的信息:在护理单元层面,有三条路径导致了极高的 CRU:极高的领导力;频繁使用教育材料;或结合极高的社会资本(团队合作)以及护理助手与临床教育者或专家之间的频繁沟通。与此相反,有 2 种途径导致 CRU 非常低,其中包括与人际关系、资源和正规学习机会等不利条件相关的 3 个环境要素。通过定性分析,我们深入了解了特定环境因素是如何成为最佳实践的促进因素或障碍的。这种定性探索尤其有助于理解其中的两条路径,说明了领导力的关键作用和团队合作在减轻时间限制的负面影响方面的作用:我们的研究加深了人们对环境因素之间复杂的相互关系及其对在长者照护中心实施最佳实践的影响的理解。研究结果强调,并不存在单一的、普遍的、能促进或阻碍最佳实践在长者照护中心应用的环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities. Development of an implementation intervention to promote adoption of the COMFORT clinical practice guideline for peripartum pain management: a qualitative study. The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States. Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to increase HPV vaccination among underserved youth across Texas: a protocol paper. Impact of learning health systems on cross-system collaboration between youth legal and community mental health systems: a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1