To Preserve or Extract? A Scoping Review and a Prognostic Decision Tool using Multispecialty Indicators.

Reem Al Shaltoni, Batool Alsulaimani, Sunporn Namano, Reem Alsaleh, Luis Del Castillo, Hiroshi Hirayama, Konstantinos Michalakis
{"title":"To Preserve or Extract? A Scoping Review and a Prognostic Decision Tool using Multispecialty Indicators.","authors":"Reem Al Shaltoni, Batool Alsulaimani, Sunporn Namano, Reem Alsaleh, Luis Del Castillo, Hiroshi Hirayama, Konstantinos Michalakis","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As implant-supported restorations have become very popular, there is a tendency to extract teeth and replace them with implants. However, the first goal of dentistry should always be the preservation of natural teeth, given the prerequisite that these can be maintained with the application of appropriate treatment modalities. Therefore, individual tooth risk assessment and prognosis are very important in the treatment plan process. Four important factors influencing the dentist's decision on whether to save or extract a compromised tooth have been identified, and an extensive search of the related English language literature has been performed. Additionally, hand-search in related journals was implemented, and classical textbooks were consulted. Identified articles on patient-related, periodontal, endodontic, and restorative factors were thoroughly analyzed, focusing on diagnosis and tooth prognosis. Fifty-two selected references have been carefully selected and reviewed. Available information was used to develop a color-coded prognostic decision chart with four different factors and up to fourteen crucial parameters. All factors and parameters were analyzed in an effort to help the restorative dentist make a prognostic decision. The proposed color-coded prognostic decision chart can be helpful when a treatment plan is made, and predictable restorative care is planned. This comprehensive prognostic decision chart can aid dentists in providing clinical care of high quality and establishing a consensus on available restorative options. It can additionally establish appropriate communication with patients and third-party individuals in the restorative care process, effectively manage risk factors, and provide a framework for quality assessment in restorative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As implant-supported restorations have become very popular, there is a tendency to extract teeth and replace them with implants. However, the first goal of dentistry should always be the preservation of natural teeth, given the prerequisite that these can be maintained with the application of appropriate treatment modalities. Therefore, individual tooth risk assessment and prognosis are very important in the treatment plan process. Four important factors influencing the dentist's decision on whether to save or extract a compromised tooth have been identified, and an extensive search of the related English language literature has been performed. Additionally, hand-search in related journals was implemented, and classical textbooks were consulted. Identified articles on patient-related, periodontal, endodontic, and restorative factors were thoroughly analyzed, focusing on diagnosis and tooth prognosis. Fifty-two selected references have been carefully selected and reviewed. Available information was used to develop a color-coded prognostic decision chart with four different factors and up to fourteen crucial parameters. All factors and parameters were analyzed in an effort to help the restorative dentist make a prognostic decision. The proposed color-coded prognostic decision chart can be helpful when a treatment plan is made, and predictable restorative care is planned. This comprehensive prognostic decision chart can aid dentists in providing clinical care of high quality and establishing a consensus on available restorative options. It can additionally establish appropriate communication with patients and third-party individuals in the restorative care process, effectively manage risk factors, and provide a framework for quality assessment in restorative treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保存还是提取?使用多专科指标的范围综述和预后决策工具。
随着种植体支持修复技术的普及,人们倾向于拔掉牙齿并用种植体替代。然而,牙科的首要目标始终应该是保留天然牙齿,前提是采用适当的治疗方法可以保持天然牙齿。因此,个人牙齿风险评估和预后在治疗计划过程中非常重要。我们确定了影响牙医决定保存还是拔除受损牙齿的四个重要因素,并对相关英文文献进行了广泛搜索。此外,还对相关期刊进行了手工检索,并查阅了经典教科书。对找到的有关患者、牙周、牙髓和修复因素的文章进行了深入分析,重点关注诊断和牙齿预后。我们仔细挑选并审阅了 52 篇精选参考文献。利用现有的信息制定了一个彩色编码的预后决策图,其中包含四个不同的因素和多达十四个关键参数。对所有因素和参数进行了分析,以帮助修复牙医做出预后决定。在制定治疗计划和可预测的修复治疗计划时,建议的彩色编码预后决策图会有所帮助。这种全面的预后决策图可以帮助牙医提供高质量的临床治疗,并就可用的修复方案达成共识。此外,它还可以在修复治疗过程中与患者和第三方人员建立适当的沟通,有效管理风险因素,并为修复治疗的质量评估提供一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Severely Discolored Teeth Due to Red Staining from Endodontic Material. Influence of Different Cements on Bonding Efficiency Between Implant Abutment and Standard Restoration. Thirty-Year Clinical Performance of Double-Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures - A Practice-Based Retrospective Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths Between Dental Ceramics and Co-Cr Frameworks Made with Digital and Conventional Techniques. 3D-Printed Permanent Resin Crowns on Pre-Molar and Molar Teeth; Two-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1