Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1002/lio2.1263
Alex Fleet BA, Yasmin Nikookam BSc, Anshul Radotra MBChB, BSc, Shravan Gowrishankar MA, MB BChir, Christopher Metcalfe MBChB, MRCS (ENT), Jameel Muzaffar MSc, FRCS (ORL-HNS), Matthew E. Smith PhD, FRCS (ORL-HNS), Peter Monksfield MSc, FRCS (ORL-HNS), Manohar Bance MSc, FRCS, FRCSC
{"title":"Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review","authors":"Alex Fleet BA,&nbsp;Yasmin Nikookam BSc,&nbsp;Anshul Radotra MBChB, BSc,&nbsp;Shravan Gowrishankar MA, MB BChir,&nbsp;Christopher Metcalfe MBChB, MRCS (ENT),&nbsp;Jameel Muzaffar MSc, FRCS (ORL-HNS),&nbsp;Matthew E. Smith PhD, FRCS (ORL-HNS),&nbsp;Peter Monksfield MSc, FRCS (ORL-HNS),&nbsp;Manohar Bance MSc, FRCS, FRCSC","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drug-eluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Searches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin-3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non-eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post-implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post-implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Eluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in-human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug-eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.1263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes.

Methods

Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drug-eluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.

Results

Searches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin-3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non-eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post-implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post-implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies.

Conclusions

Eluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in-human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug-eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用洗脱电极植入人工耳蜗后的效果:系统回顾
目的 确定使用洗脱电极对人类和动物进行人工耳蜗植入后的听力和其他结果。 方法 系统综述和叙述性综述。检索数据库(2023 年 4 月):MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Web of Science。纳入了报告使用药物洗脱电极植入人工耳蜗后人类或动物结果的研究。语言或发表年份不限。所有纳入的研究均采用布拉泽利或实验动物实验系统综述中心 (SYRCLE) 的评估工具进行偏倚风险评估。综述按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)2020 声明进行。 结果 通过检索发现了 146 篇摘要和 108 篇全文。其中,18 项研究符合纳入标准,报告了 523 只动物(17 项研究)和 24 名人类(1 项研究)的结果。洗脱电极包括地塞米松(16 项研究)、阿糖胞苷(1 项研究)、烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(1 项研究)、生长因子胰岛素样生长因子 1 (IGF1) 和肝细胞生长因子 (HGF) (1 项研究)以及神经营养素-3(1 项研究)。所有纳入的研究都比较了植入洗脱电极与对照非洗脱电极后的结果。在大多数研究中,植入洗脱电极后的听力结果(如听性脑干反应阈值)优于标准电极。大多数调查植入后阻抗的研究报告称,植入洗脱电极后阻抗较低。洗脱电极对其他报告结果的影响(包括植入后耳蜗纤维化以及毛细胞和螺旋神经节神经元的存活率)在纳入的研究中差异较大。 结论 在动物实验中,洗脱电极在保留人工耳蜗植入后的残余听力和降低阻抗方面显示出良好的前景,但仍缺乏人体实验数据。要确定药物洗脱人工耳蜗作为未来感音神经性听力损失治疗方法的临床实用性,还需要进一步的人体研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A MAUDE database analysis on the new generation of active bone conduction hearing implants Histological characterization of rat vocal fold across different postnatal periods Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing Outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise: A 10-year single institution experience As a phenomenon: Ramadan fasting improves olfactory performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1