Systematic Review on Role of Drug Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Cardiology Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s11886-024-02077-8
Motisola Mutema, Vishnu Shenoy, Partha Sardar, Sahil Parikh, Saurav Chatterjee
{"title":"Systematic Review on Role of Drug Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Motisola Mutema, Vishnu Shenoy, Partha Sardar, Sahil Parikh, Saurav Chatterjee","doi":"10.1007/s11886-024-02077-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explain the current advancements in the treatment modalities for small vessel coronary artery disease (SVCAD) and de novo lesions post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on drug-coated stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB). Its goal is to address the lack of standards in the management of these lesions and to assess the potential of DCB as a preferential treatment strategy over DES in the long term. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements have improved drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) which offer a more promising avenue for managing SVCAD. According to new data, DCBs, initially recognized for their efficacy in preventing restenosis within three to five years of stent placement, may offer superior outcomes compared to DES in certain clinical scenarios. This review shows that DCBs have a favorable therapeutic profile in the treatment of SVCAD, and they could be considered as an alternative to DES. Although the initial data is compelling, definitive conclusions cannot be met without further large-scale, long-term clinical trials. The implication of these findings suggests a shift in the future of SVCAD management and requires additional research to substantiate the long-term benefits of DCB use in SVCAD. Should ongoing and future studies corroborate the current evidence, DCB could emerge as the standard of care for SVCAD, significantly influencing clinical practices and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10829,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02077-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explain the current advancements in the treatment modalities for small vessel coronary artery disease (SVCAD) and de novo lesions post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on drug-coated stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB). Its goal is to address the lack of standards in the management of these lesions and to assess the potential of DCB as a preferential treatment strategy over DES in the long term. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements have improved drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) which offer a more promising avenue for managing SVCAD. According to new data, DCBs, initially recognized for their efficacy in preventing restenosis within three to five years of stent placement, may offer superior outcomes compared to DES in certain clinical scenarios. This review shows that DCBs have a favorable therapeutic profile in the treatment of SVCAD, and they could be considered as an alternative to DES. Although the initial data is compelling, definitive conclusions cannot be met without further large-scale, long-term clinical trials. The implication of these findings suggests a shift in the future of SVCAD management and requires additional research to substantiate the long-term benefits of DCB use in SVCAD. Should ongoing and future studies corroborate the current evidence, DCB could emerge as the standard of care for SVCAD, significantly influencing clinical practices and future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物洗脱支架 (DES) 与药物涂层球囊 (DCB) 在小血管冠状动脉疾病中的作用的系统性综述。
综述目的:本综述旨在解释经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后小血管冠状动脉疾病(SVCAD)和新病变治疗方法的最新进展,重点关注药物涂层支架(DES)和药物涂层球囊(DCB)。其目的是解决这些病变管理缺乏标准的问题,并评估 DCB 作为一种优于 DES 的长期治疗策略的潜力。最新发现:技术进步改进了药物洗脱支架(DES)和药物涂层球囊(DCB),为治疗 SVCAD 提供了更有前景的途径。新数据显示,DCB最初因其在支架置入后三到五年内防止再狭窄的功效而得到认可,在某些临床情况下,DCB可能比药物洗脱支架具有更好的疗效。这篇综述显示,DCB 在治疗 SVCAD 方面具有良好的治疗效果,可以考虑将其作为 DES 的替代疗法。虽然初步数据令人信服,但如果没有进一步的大规模、长期临床试验,还不能得出明确的结论。这些发现的意义表明,SVCAD 治疗的未来将发生转变,需要更多的研究来证实 DCB 用于 SVCAD 的长期益处。如果当前和未来的研究能够证实当前的证据,DCB 将成为 SVCAD 的标准治疗方法,并对临床实践和未来研究产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reports
Current Cardiology Reports CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to provide timely perspectives from experts on current advances in cardiovascular medicine. We also seek to provide reviews that highlight the most important recently published papers selected from the wealth of available cardiovascular literature. We accomplish this aim by appointing key authorities in major subject areas across the discipline. Section editors select topics to be reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published over the past year. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular Outcomes of Uric Acid Lowering Medications: A Meta-Analysis. The Role of Subcutaneous Furosemide in Heart Failure Management: A Systematic Review. In Vivo and In Vitro Approaches to Modeling Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Echocardiography for Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy. The Price We Pay for Progression in Shock Care: Economic Burden, Accessibility, and Adoption of Shock-Teams and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1