A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235
Ying LI , Demei Zhu , Shenghua Sun , Xiaoyue Chang , Zhaolong Cao , Yanping Yang , Xiuhua Fu , Xiangyang Li , Jinfu Xu , Yingqun Zhu , Fuxin Hui , Xingxiang Xu , Zhang Chen , Liping Peng , Zhuang Ma , Biwen Mo , Chen Li , Yuan Lv , Li Zhao , Guangfa Zhu , Yingyuan Zhang
{"title":"A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients","authors":"Ying LI ,&nbsp;Demei Zhu ,&nbsp;Shenghua Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Chang ,&nbsp;Zhaolong Cao ,&nbsp;Yanping Yang ,&nbsp;Xiuhua Fu ,&nbsp;Xiangyang Li ,&nbsp;Jinfu Xu ,&nbsp;Yingqun Zhu ,&nbsp;Fuxin Hui ,&nbsp;Xingxiang Xu ,&nbsp;Zhang Chen ,&nbsp;Liping Peng ,&nbsp;Zhuang Ma ,&nbsp;Biwen Mo ,&nbsp;Chen Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Lv ,&nbsp;Li Zhao ,&nbsp;Guangfa Zhu ,&nbsp;Yingyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (<em>n</em> = 349) or levofloxacin (<em>n</em> = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7–14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535/pdfft?md5=99249c47d6b793136ea7139c268c8f82&pid=1-s2.0-S0924857924001535-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001535","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.

Methods

Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin.

Results

Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n = 349) or levofloxacin (n = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.

Conclusions

Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7–14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多中心、随机、双盲、双哑药、平行对照的 3 期临床试验,评估静脉注射苹果酸奈莫沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗成年患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。
背景:苹果酸奈莫沙星是一种新型非氟化喹诺酮类药物,可口服和静脉注射。这项三期多中心、随机、双盲、双假、平行对照临床试验(NCT02205112)评估了静脉注射奈莫沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的疗效和安全性:符合条件的患者被随机分配接受500毫克奈莫沙星或左氧氟沙星静脉输注,每天一次,连续7-14天。主要终点是改良意向治疗(mITT)人群在治愈测试(TOC)时的临床治愈率。在次要疗效和安全性终点方面,还比较了奈莫沙星和左氧氟沙星的疗效和安全性:总共有 525 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中包括奈莫沙星(349 人)或左氧氟沙星(176 人)。在mITT人群中,奈莫沙星的临床治愈率为91.8%(279/304),左氧氟沙星的临床治愈率为85.7%(138/161)(P> 0.05)。在治疗CAP方面,奈莫沙星的临床疗效不劣于左氧氟沙星。在细菌学mITT人群中,奈莫沙星的微生物学成功率为88.8%(95/107),而左氧氟沙星的TOC访视成功率为87.8%(43/49)(P>0.05)。奈莫沙星组和左氧氟沙星组的药物相关不良事件(AEs)发生率分别为37.1%和22.2%,主要是输液部位的局部反应、恶心、ALT/AST升高和QT间期延长。奈莫沙星相关的不良反应大多较轻,停用奈莫沙星后即可缓解:奈莫沙星 500 毫克,静脉滴注,每日一次,疗程 7-14 天,在治疗成年患者的 CAP 方面既有效又安全,其疗效不亚于左氧氟沙星。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
期刊最新文献
International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC) News and Information Page Advances in Virus-Specific T Cell Therapy for Polyomavirus Infections: A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Mainland China: A Focus on Geographic Differences through Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Epidemiology of subsequent Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection among rectal carriers: a meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors and their association with geographic region and age. In-host intra- and inter-species transfer of blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-1 in Serratia marcescens and its local and global epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1